切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 21133阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview |phWK^   
    j3[OY  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability >KClH'R2  
    CMG`'gT  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools 'Rh>w=wB'  
    pTX'5   
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses W7[ S7kd  
    ,/b/O4`;y  
    User Interface 3F'dT[;  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only @[b:([  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous MqBATW.pmJ  
    muX4Y1M_  
    Modeling o>A%}YU  
    Most elements cannot be edited yoY)6cn@  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) }NBJ T4R  
    No unboolean capability !6/IKh`J  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time iM/0Yp-v'>  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses +95dz?~  
    x7 1!r  
    Ray Trace bfI -!,  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace 8oH54bFp  
    No point sources; no volume sources )Q j9kJq  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) h_G7T1;L  
    #Ii.tTk  
    Analysis V dOd:w  
    No illumination error estimate h>%JG'DV  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 5a_!&  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres ; <@O^_+  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro j2qfEvU  
    vm^# aoDB  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro h GXD u;{  
    Interactive ray trace #=#$b_6*  
    Editable geometry E d/O\v@  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) y" -{6{3  
    WA\f`SRF  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented g uWqHVSs  
    3D textures jeFl+K'1  
    Source definition !jq6cND  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist BD#;3?|  
    6lAo`S\)eX  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition A3pQ?d[  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface 1H 6Wrik  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) s9bP6N!,  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities G.e\#_RR?  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) deY<+!  
    becQ5w/~  
    TracePro features not in LT ClZyQ=UAD  
    Ray trace through GRIN material ahv=HWX k  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP rep"xV&|>o  
    AR3=G>hO,  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT |c/rHEZ  
    ?EAqv]  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT *60)Vo.=  
    Ec 7M'~1  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) '=* 5C{  
    y<(.,Nb8  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT ?%ntO]  
    O8o18m8UH  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) cA2]VL.r>C  
    ix`xdVj`  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP o]U ==  
    ev >9P  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons jqedHn x  
    E}2[P b)e  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP 92Iv'(1ba  
    PX)qA =4q  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software b@hoH)<9E  
    kGP?Jx\PkH  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    199
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools lUd,-  
    ^5}3FvW  
    -X \v B  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 H#E0S>Jw|  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented etVE8N'  
    zu%pr95U  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 * =l9gv&  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 s2WB4U k  
        6}$cDk`dz  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!