切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19671阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview %1jApCJ  
    CiSl 0  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability ~ GW8|tw  
    8x9$6HO  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools auS.q5 %  
    ,dO$R.h  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses ] 336FgT  
    U.B=%S  
    User Interface [Ifhh2  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only 4/B n9F  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous {UR&Y  
    +e6c4Tw/  
    Modeling /-W-MP=Wd  
    Most elements cannot be edited >.-$?2  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 0u"/7OU  
    No unboolean capability r 7mg>3  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time 2iM8V  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses P;dp>jL  
    @-ma_0cZQ  
    Ray Trace `=0J:  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace Z{w{bf1&A  
    No point sources; no volume sources h!*++Y?&0  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) -*K!JC-  
    ?"aj&,q+  
    Analysis r12{XW?~  
    No illumination error estimate |;-,(509  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 7Pc0|Z/  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres ClHaR  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro lbES9o5  
    Te8BFcJG  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro :8_`T$8i4  
    Interactive ray trace w jmZ`UMz  
    Editable geometry k:4?3zJI  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) $l&&y?()  
    T2wn!N?r  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented ."Yub];H  
    3D textures gKZ{O  
    Source definition >EMgP1  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist qD\%8l.]Z  
    <LW|m7  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition \i-jME(sN  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface (Df<QC`0v  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) bE>3D#V<  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities L\og`L)5\  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) 4C /8hsn  
    dITnPb)i  
    TracePro features not in LT i&,U);T  
    Ray trace through GRIN material l@*/1O)v  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP :,q3?l6  
    M{kPEl&Z  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT w#mnGD  
    _ga!TQ:  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT GIVs)~/Eq  
    ,P"R.A  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) r-YQsu&  
    24N,Bo 3  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT 0HD1Ob^@  
    )Q xv9:X  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) Y)u} +Yg  
    ^RWt  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP \>=YxB q  
    4_.k Q"'DH  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons ') 1sw%[2  
    hTG d Uw]  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP ^Js9E  
    3sZK[Y|ax  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software uBE,z>/,;  
    H4:TYh  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools  ^,KR0  
    b/K&8C,c  
    ,xh9,EpBk  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 /3TorB~Y  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented m~U{ V9;*  
    Fp]8f&l8  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 D1Sl+NOV  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 ^n2w6U0  
        ppnj.tLz;r  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!