切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19497阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview tgyW:<iv  
    *"nN To  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability .} O@<t  
    dzQs7D}  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools 8TBv~Q u  
    57wHo[CJ  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses AQ&vq$  
    EQWRfx?d  
    User Interface S zNZY&8 f  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Z9G4in8  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous {'Y()p3kl  
    ' 7Mz]@  
    Modeling GbC@ |  
    Most elements cannot be edited h`dHk]O  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) c,^W/:CQAB  
    No unboolean capability s~QIs  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time NCdDG  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses .]H/u "d  
    |}2/:f#Iz*  
    Ray Trace Y<IuwS  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace g:O/~L0Xb  
    No point sources; no volume sources {Q>4zepN!  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) o|u4C{j  
    &zd@cr1  
    Analysis ^W(ue]j}o  
    No illumination error estimate LF `]=.Q  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” <ne?;P1L  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres p$G3<Z&7  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro 5VpqDL~d  
    _xH<R  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro Yn$: |$  
    Interactive ray trace E=8GSl/Jx  
    Editable geometry r;)31Tg  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) |Eh2#K0x4G  
    AOkG.u-k  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented ~3-"1E>Rgy  
    3D textures mZXtHFMu  
    Source definition $0x+b!_l@  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist i#^YQCy  
    wd32q7lGo1  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition 4DDBf j  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface =L@CZ"  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 6`iYIXnz  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities `#w#!@s#@  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) T{^P  
    VwRZgL  
    TracePro features not in LT r~JGs?GH  
    Ray trace through GRIN material D5oYcGc  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP }:YL'$:5!  
    }apno|W&  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT (3$DUvx7  
    [&4+ <Nl'  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT < qab\M0W  
    +c!HXX  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) MRXw)NAw  
    K?[Vz[-Fc  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT E3Y0@r  
    U}DE9e{/!  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) k!z<=WA  
    ]LZ#[xnM7  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP Wu<;QY($5  
    J=78p#XUg  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons &L5 )v\z  
    i ]8bj5j{  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP nyqX\m-  
    $#+D:W)az  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software W|Sab$h  
    RCYv2=m>Q  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools w' J`$=  
    z8'zH>  
    4G' E< ab  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 =H23eOS_#  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented _eq$C=3Ta  
    w0Nm.=I-   
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 B0gD4MX/  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 _V1:'T8  
        >itabG-&  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!