切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20350阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview jm~qD T,  
    9d\B*OU  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability ,KfBG<3   
    l"C)Ia&/  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools VGHy|5K$  
    A6D@#(D  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses ]0 g$3  
    UC u4S >  
    User Interface 5S;|U&f|  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only iG.qMf.  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous 5D~>Ed;  
    n#NE.ap$&,  
    Modeling r8k.I4  
    Most elements cannot be edited Sh]g]xR  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) XDot3)2`  
    No unboolean capability Tej&1'G  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time Q9[$ 8  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses +1R qo  
    T VuDK  
    Ray Trace -t5DcEAb$  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace $PNS`@B  
    No point sources; no volume sources ?)60JWOJ1  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) A18&9gY  
    #Fl5]> |  
    Analysis VkD8h+)  
    No illumination error estimate X-Q;4M-CJ  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” =s\RK   
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres ]h`<E~  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro //ZYN2lT4  
    */kX|Sur  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro Z Rjqjx  
    Interactive ray trace R>3a?.X  
    Editable geometry 5GwXZ;(G  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) 8:iu 8c$  
    !aVwmd'9  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented HLP nbI-+  
    3D textures `2j \(N,  
    Source definition X5M{No>z  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist uAWmg8  
    |&>!"27;w  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition @rTAbEk{U  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface ]{[8$|Mg  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 0>E0}AvkT  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities Ww }qK|D  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) +h*.%P}o  
    P@u&~RN9f+  
    TracePro features not in LT >-~2:d\M3  
    Ray trace through GRIN material pO~VI$7  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP Qoj}]jve  
    Lnk!zj  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT .45XS>=z#  
    f[@M  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT K{ s=k/h  
    t*fG;YOg  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) `VT0wAe2;  
    ~)S Q{eK?&  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT _t:l:x.;T  
    XZcT-w 7  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) ?|i6]y=D  
    n&. bs7N2  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP =,aWO7Pz  
    [n`SXBi+n  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons X^tVq..0  
    [;c'o5M&  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP XFeeNcqF  
    ${$XJs4  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software W#<&(s4  
    WC!bB  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools )Oq N\  
    nL}bCX{  
    \C3ir&  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 {IeW~S' &  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented )x.}B4z  
    w;.'>ORC  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 &bx;GG\<4  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 ]fXMp*LvY  
        G"jKYW  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!