切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20675阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview /5~j"| U'  
    :M.]-+(  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability 'JJ :  
    VP^{-mDph  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools a[J_H$6H!  
    4 ;^  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses nX<yB9bXDg  
    FLQ^J3A,I  
    User Interface ?}No'E1!I  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only  @4>?Y=#  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous _ 3{8Zg  
    wvH*<,8V q  
    Modeling fwSI"cfM  
    Most elements cannot be edited 9Yji34eDZ  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) q5.5%W  
    No unboolean capability &&Otj-n5  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time @e+qe9A|  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses c  
    UM. Se(kS  
    Ray Trace o 'Z W  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace D\  P-|}  
    No point sources; no volume sources Xliw(B'\a4  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) fAD {sg  
    6}:(m#+  
    Analysis ) Hqn  
    No illumination error estimate _ Uv3g lK  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” IDp2#qg_  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres VKy3tW/_&  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro / 16 r_l  
    /[|A(,N}{  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro Rc~63![O.  
    Interactive ray trace V/J-zH&  
    Editable geometry e_llW(*l8^  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) 5- "aK~@+  
    HCaEETk5  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented vH{JLN2  
    3D textures 8b $e)  
    Source definition $wqi^q*)  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist Uy$?B"Z  
    z?(QM:  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition um$L;-2:  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface fUB+9G(Bx  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) {Pe+d3Eoo  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities 7niI65  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) h\*I*I8C  
    $!:xjb  
    TracePro features not in LT 9w$+Qc  
    Ray trace through GRIN material 4z,n:>oH  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP o*s3"Ib  
    =kn-F T  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT H)i%\7F5  
    CI@qT}Y_  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT N"2P]Z r  
    ,%,.c^-  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) Yx<wYzD  
    2-gI@8NPI  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT 8\CmM\R  
    6q~*\KRk  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) f=nVK4DuZ  
    oCuKmK8  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP mf)E%qo  
    K?acRi  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons K"9V8x3Wg  
    2f.4P]s`T  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP I07_o"3>qr  
    Ixv/xI  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software gqan]b_  
    f 7j9'k  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools \x+"1  
    ^_pJEX  
    \9s x_T  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 ~3s\Q%   
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented Com`4>0>I  
    J9yB'yE8  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 ouR(l;  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 9U~sRj=D  
        Z|qUVD5Ic  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!