切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19960阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview 1Z9qjV%^  
    ub|V\M{  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability ';<0/U  
    aoXb22]{  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools ^k9kJ+x^S2  
    }K&7%N4LZ  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses _ ]Z s,Hy  
    #W|'1 OX4  
    User Interface +t?3T-@Ks  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only ~P@Q7T*  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous Z /9>  
    Nd;K u6  
    Modeling % ClHCoyA  
    Most elements cannot be edited #Y4=J 6  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) IyPwP*A  
    No unboolean capability k3uit+ge }  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time `|/<\  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses )/wk ( O+  
    9_ d pR.  
    Ray Trace k<" oiCE  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace [Lzw#XE  
    No point sources; no volume sources *#C+iAF|)'  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) ~FN9 [aJF+  
    {o>j6RS\  
    Analysis Zd')57{  
    No illumination error estimate 0`[wpZ  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” zlEX+=3  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres /%;mqrdk  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro Y4v|ko`l%  
    JW3B'_0  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro rv|)n>m  
    Interactive ray trace 50o~ P!Lz|  
    Editable geometry c1E'$- K@  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) :R~MO&  
    ~x ]jB  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented bp~g;h*E2  
    3D textures 'LE =6{#  
    Source definition `pGa~!vl  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist rV T{90,  
    !Ikt '5/  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition x3o ]U)^  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface ' <@3i[M  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) /(.mp<s0  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities /assq+H  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) CD~z=vlK-  
    n}!PO[m~  
    TracePro features not in LT AMyIAZnYq)  
    Ray trace through GRIN material 3_MS.iM  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP z <##g  
    -T[lx\}  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT B(n{e53 9f  
    CTZh0 x  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT  y"H*%]  
    +h r@#n4A  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) /XzH?n/{R  
    Ljx(\Cm  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT )C(? bR  
    B#.L  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) +i@y@<l:+  
    T<55a6NoK  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP 98uV6b~g  
    \kU &^Hi  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons ZI3Nq  
    A8oo@z68n>  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP + EGD.S{  
    k=4N.*#`y  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software Q2F+?w;,  
    S'_-G;g.  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools a6WI170^1  
    /$'AjIg4:&  
    V9dF1Hj  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 }DK7'K  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented -1U D0(  
    .[3Z1v,  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 o8-^cP1  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 QUQu^p  
        @++.FEf  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!