切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19117阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview ,uz ]V1  
    mfny4R1_  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability .bD_R7Bi6  
    OOBhbpg!D  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools )U:2z-X&e  
    K~RoUE<3[  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses ?R Fg$Z'^  
     6qo^2  
    User Interface 2WvN2" f3  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only ]J2:194  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous HjWq[[Nz  
    EA<}[4#jS  
    Modeling IB9%QW"0  
    Most elements cannot be edited Z< b"`ty.  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) }iBC@`mg(  
    No unboolean capability Cup@TET35  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time $t rAC@3O@  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses #6S75{rnW"  
    }b["Jk\2  
    Ray Trace b1^n KB  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace Y\/gU8w/  
    No point sources; no volume sources T9y;OG  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) oholt/gb+0  
    q$ghLGz  
    Analysis QYE7p\  
    No illumination error estimate j;P+_Hfe/E  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” j,%EW+j$  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres NSLVD[yT  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro dXu{p  
    \ a-CN>  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro U :9=3A2$x  
    Interactive ray trace 4B O %{  
    Editable geometry 7$T8&Mh  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) \MYU<6{u  
    %|Hp Bs#'  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented -]"T^w ib  
    3D textures I ,FqN}  
    Source definition \gKdD S  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist NtZ6$o<Y  
    B%b_/F]e  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition # 3.)H9  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface E3\ZJjG  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) LcUlc)YH5  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities u(vw|nj`  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) kV^?p  
    W8/(;K`/  
    TracePro features not in LT lCFU1 GHH  
    Ray trace through GRIN material APHPN:v  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP r@$B'CsLj  
    .Vh*Z<9S4  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT KM5 JZZP  
    |!b9b(_j9  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT 9v?V  
    f'_ S1\  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) 8eww7k^R  
    ,P{ HE8.  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT I@PJl  
    qc-C>Ra  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) u9}!Gq  
    + U5U.f%  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP 3/tJDb5  
    ;Uk!jQh  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons lVT&+r~r  
    |KaR n;BM  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP KL~AzLI  
    J" wKRy  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software  V.fp/jhj  
    {9{J^@@  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools cl2ze  
    b\M b*o  
    .]zw*t*  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 M)tv;!eQ  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented EFv4=OWB  
    AA_@\: w^  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 +<B|qcT!  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 :4]J2U\@  
        F%y{% C7l  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!