切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20075阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview _ -C{:rV  
    ya0D5 0m  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability h}c R >  
    ]Geg;[ t  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools iF'qaqHWY4  
    3zuYN-;  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses IIIP<nyc  
    EHqcQx`K_  
    User Interface 9L9+zs3 k  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Cqc5jx0)  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous '\I!RAZ  
    k@/s-^ry3  
    Modeling q}0xQjpo  
    Most elements cannot be edited j$jgEtPK9=  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) y=spD^tM8  
    No unboolean capability )=@ SA`J  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time 3}9c0%}F  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses -K*&I!  
    1<TB{}b Z  
    Ray Trace 0;  BX  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace UG:S!w'  
    No point sources; no volume sources \1R<GBC4  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) ~rICPR  
    +(l(|lQy$  
    Analysis AIX?840V  
    No illumination error estimate GB\1'  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 052e zh_  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres a15kFun  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro I("lGY  
    X8Y)5,`s  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro *j"u~ N F  
    Interactive ray trace |];f?1  
    Editable geometry iz @LS  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) $G}!eV 6  
    qnCJrY6]  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented LCouDk(=`  
    3D textures "-afHXED  
    Source definition E@%9u#  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist ILyI%DA&  
    SL ) ope  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition aRE%(-5  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface h5^qo ^;g7  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) yh:Wg$qx  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities  J*FUJT  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) N6UPD11}6  
    >pRC$'Usx  
    TracePro features not in LT vtu!* 7m  
    Ray trace through GRIN material L=#nnj-  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP @/f'i9?oM`  
    U6x$R O!  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT _-c1" Kl  
    MR3\7D+9y  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT tB)nQw7  
    ,d`6 {ll  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) Ahf71YP  
    Or3GrZ!H  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT ;6AanwR6  
    =;A >1g$  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) Bj*\)lG<  
    `)WC|=w2  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP  U!O"f  
    l?<DY$H 0  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons B]#^&89wG)  
    ;6}> Shs  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP ^d@ME<mb  
    }Yargj_Gn  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software FxdWJ|rN9D  
    9 .18E(-  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools 3Pgld*i7  
    C Ef*:kr  
    eZ8DW6l*  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 au#/Q  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented /*e6('9s  
    PS$g *x  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 utU ;M*  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 &fe67#0r)  
        4L/nEZ!Nsu  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!