切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20153阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview V^`?8P8d  
    l\=-+'Y  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability Oa}V>a  
    zOiY0`=  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools yK&* ,J |  
    r}y[r}vk  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses !O F?xW  
    9b"9m*gC  
    User Interface 4#@W;'  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only )H;pGM:  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous XJ:>UNf5;  
    Y3P.|  
    Modeling t":W.q<  
    Most elements cannot be edited T}n}.JwU  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) zmB31' _  
    No unboolean capability 7>'uj7r]=  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time o9m  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses <$ i"zb  
    "K|)<6J  
    Ray Trace #cj\~T.,,  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace 4pmTicA~  
    No point sources; no volume sources hncS_ZA  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) Qy=HrL]x  
    OuOk=  
    Analysis W NwJM  
    No illumination error estimate ;dqk@@O"(  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 5q|+p?C  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres )\T@W  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro kAZC"qM%i  
    Q7,EY /  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro "sF Xl  
    Interactive ray trace hq/J6 M  
    Editable geometry c%|vUAq*  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) Dh2:2Rz=#7  
    gw_|C|!P  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented g3|BE2?  
    3D textures az0cS*@  
    Source definition 1<xcMn0et  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist G1}~.%J  
    JXpoCCe  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition n!GWqle  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface CN$I:o04C  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) \r)%R5_CQ  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities y^2#9\}K  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) 7^ 4jcfJH  
    Y4QLs^IdB  
    TracePro features not in LT B;VH`*+X  
    Ray trace through GRIN material ; ;<J x.  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP _-n Y2)  
    Vl<`|C>  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT hQXxG/yFm  
    9oEpPL5  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT >A3LA3( c  
    4<u;a46Z#M  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) |VK:2p^ u  
    }d_<\  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT PNf&@  
    PC|'yAN:  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) XM$GQn]B  
    pjACFVMFX  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP sH%&+4!3  
    s3seK6x'  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons ^uhxURF  
    zO%w_7 w  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP 6J\q`q(W(  
    >5.zk1&H  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software GMBJjP&R]  
    PB+\jj  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools .U 39nd  
    Pg Syt  
    >b>gr OX  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 KSc~GP _  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented ^sV|ck  
    80}4/8  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 eQ<xp A  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 @V$I?iXV  
        Zi/-~')E  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!