切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19465阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview &{&lCBN  
    `(;d+fof  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability z1!ya#,$  
    : ` F>B  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools L3q)j\ ls  
    e^~t52]  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses o~P8=1t   
    (]1le|+  
    User Interface U YUIpe  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Zpb3>0<R  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous 4)Pt]#Ti  
    q(.%f3(  
    Modeling 58e{WC  
    Most elements cannot be edited $6!`  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) }WI24|`zM  
    No unboolean capability .e.vh:Sz  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time I4|p;\`fK  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses {z F  
    SmR*b2U  
    Ray Trace k}T~N.0  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace 0l 3RwWj  
    No point sources; no volume sources >^InNJd  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) |?8CV\D!  
    -IX;r1UD  
    Analysis H50nR$$<*Y  
    No illumination error estimate eazP'(rc  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” e:7aVOm  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres Q^39Wk@  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro fZ %ZV  
    / TJTu_#  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro &P+cTN9)  
    Interactive ray trace `7 B [<  
    Editable geometry KPO((G0&  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) m",bfZ  
    3QR-8  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented qob!!A14p  
    3D textures cxv) LOl-  
    Source definition G: &Q)_  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist iH$N HfH  
    LaIif_fie^  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition Ebk@x=E  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface .ev]tu2N  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) d)AkA\neWo  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities p,0 \NUC  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) D2mB4  
    #nxx\,i>  
    TracePro features not in LT 2>r.[  
    Ray trace through GRIN material (#,.;Y  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP 3_>1j  
    . =5Jpo  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT OH(+]%B78  
    \r 2qH0B  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT FSB$D)4z>b  
    4~/6d9f  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) ]aR4U`  
    D0P% .r"v  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT lyPXlt  
    i_@RWka<  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) GwV FD%  
    pWp2{G^XB  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP {3R ax5Ty  
    vqHJc2yYkZ  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons 6. jZy~  
    yM2&cMHH~  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP ChGM7uu2  
    m [g}vwS  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software ?X1#b2s  
    v\eBL&WK  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools ->8q, W2A  
    hhGpB$A  
    EC'bgFe  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 _vH!0@QFU  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented SZ{cno1`  
    5-HJ&Q  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 `uA&w}(G  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 g{hA,-3  
        dY<#a,eS  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!