切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19195阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview Gd|jE  
    .]; `  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability i}C%`1+(  
    B^j(Fq  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools xz}=C:s  
    Wf&i{3z[  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses bhCAx W  
    iv6bXV'N  
    User Interface 7K/t>QrBtU  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only -B:O0;f  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous ^E3 HY@j  
    #o(@S{(NZ  
    Modeling _D1)_?`a@-  
    Most elements cannot be edited (U*Zz+ R   
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) =CL h<&  
    No unboolean capability @SAJ*h fb0  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time 9|>5;Ej  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses %&4\'lE  
    PjU.4aZ  
    Ray Trace \3cg\Q+~  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace &- ZRS/_d>  
    No point sources; no volume sources |d_ rK2  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) 6hqqZ  
    mCEWp  
    Analysis s;:quM  
    No illumination error estimate 6X$iTJ[\x  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” x_x|D|@wM  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres `wNJ*`  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro axd9b,  
    7R".$ p  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro u2Qs}FX  
    Interactive ray trace O}"fhMk  
    Editable geometry XBHv V05mv  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) *wJ'Z4_5F  
    ktK/s!bgY  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented \fD[Ej  
    3D textures & A@ !g  
    Source definition %b`B.A  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist _yVF+\kQ  
    60Obek`  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition NbW5a3=  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface Y{ 2xokJ N  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) G6x2!Ny  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities BXo9s~5Q  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) d@t3C8  
    MEn#MT/Cz  
    TracePro features not in LT Mt`XHXTp  
    Ray trace through GRIN material Gu9x4p  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP tC -H2@  
    mg^\"GC*8  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT >xE{& ):  
    TID0x/j"K5  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT o(@F37r{?  
    o<-+y\J8K  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) 3M&75OE  
    m=< ;)  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT ~X -.@k'  
    W=~H_ L?/  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) ".SQ*'Oc  
    AFSFXPl "  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP /aB9pD+%  
    5&r2a}K  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons oB$D&  
    LHWh-h(s  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP *{)![pDYd  
    +:[dviyPt  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 6X:- Z 3  
    VMW ?[j  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools <96ih$5D1  
    0r=Lilu{q  
    6|LDb"Rvy  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 k>n^QHM  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented (.!q~G  
    {R,rc!yF  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 (w% hz']  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 u6jJf@!ws  
        U'.>wjO  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!