切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19934阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview ,}u,)7  
    40R"^*  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability gji*Wq  
    q?(A!1(u  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools UmYD]  
    >B`Cch/ 'U  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Wa(W&]  
    NWw<B3aL  
    User Interface 0 4P.p6  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Fs?( UM  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous qI(W$  
    z'?SRK5+  
    Modeling O5u cI$s  
    Most elements cannot be edited SE6>vKR/.  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 92s4u3 L;  
    No unboolean capability n'q aR<bY  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time BHEs+ e0  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses >Dk1axZ!>/  
    4 U3C~J  
    Ray Trace )ZQHa7V  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace JtSuD>H`"  
    No point sources; no volume sources @m5O{[euj<  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) S4;wa6  
    i:C.8hmAE  
    Analysis  -PcS(  
    No illumination error estimate >Kz_My9  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” d,zp `S  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres .UNF~}^H  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro kEp.0wL'  
    eKL]E!  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro b\kN_  
    Interactive ray trace eV"dv*R  
    Editable geometry =6.8bZT\  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) b{Z^)u2X  
    xR\D(FLV S  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented OAmES;Ck$(  
    3D textures *rS9eej  
    Source definition 5x:Ift *  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist (%``EIc<8  
    p:DL:^zx  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition )B -MPuB  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface )2iM<-uB  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) jA20c(O  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities ^n\9AE3  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) \(.nPW]9  
    BNAguAxWo  
    TracePro features not in LT {DKXn`V  
    Ray trace through GRIN material @5{.K/s  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP \_m\U.*  
    .b =M5JsyV  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT r1[E{Tpz  
    U%mkhWn  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT ( z8]FT  
    -/ (DP x  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) 3q~":bpAp  
    Q3<bC6$r  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT Y9IJ   
    t9Enk!@  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) %NF<bEV  
    =oL8d 6nI  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP 4A\BGD*5  
    |i,zY{GI+2  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons Ze$^UR  
    otmIu`h  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP <Um1h:^   
    E5,%J  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software LVR;&Z>j  
    LG/=+[\{E  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools v7{ P].M  
    p^pQZ6-  
    Nt`F0 9S  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 @1pW!AdN  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented &X#x9|=&O  
    JEK%yMj  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 h3UZ|B0=  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 -dc5D@4`#s  
        "W?l R4  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!