切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19924阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview xO>z )3A  
    /kK*%TP  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability }lX$KuD  
    `b8nz 7  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools Y0|){&PCt  
    [.xY>\e  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses &-Ch>:[  
    ^;a .;wR  
    User Interface ( `bb1gz  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only M KW~rrR  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous .uauSx/#4  
    -F`GZ  
    Modeling 8=L"rekV_  
    Most elements cannot be edited Bh=t%#y|`  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) >YWK"~|i~  
    No unboolean capability K<5yjG8&  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time N7lg6$s Aj  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses uoE+:,P  
    /+%aSPQ  
    Ray Trace K% FK  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace '9WTz(0?  
    No point sources; no volume sources Lw[=pe0e  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) 1O0. CC,p  
    %<DdX*Qp  
    Analysis 9:@Xz5  
    No illumination error estimate U"8Hw@  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” co8R-AB  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres P-2DBNB7  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro H*k\C  
    KPz0;2}  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro #$S~QS.g  
    Interactive ray trace a+lNXlh=  
    Editable geometry JjI1^FRd  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) Q3hf =&$  
    };rp25i  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented i@rUZYF  
    3D textures Z+U -+eG  
    Source definition FNraof @Oy  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist B<BS^waU  
    d.w]\  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition ~Sb)i f  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface \Db`RvEmR  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) ;Ngk"5  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities H%l-@::+$  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) LYYz=oZOE!  
    ~v\ W[  
    TracePro features not in LT QlB9m2XB  
    Ray trace through GRIN material . U6(>6-  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP c0e[vrP:  
    ;|XX^  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT >G!=lLyR  
    + @fEw  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT xPm{'J+b~  
    O95gdxc  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) |H5GWZ O{^  
    bnL!PsG$K,  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT & .1-6  
    MkGQ  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) w6> P[oW  
    ]Kjt@F";  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP p8j4Tc5tQ>  
    E7R%G OH  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons ;TDvk ]:  
    Kp7)my  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP E83$(6z  
    O\cc=7  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software uAnL`  
    &X~8S/nPAw  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools 1+3-Z>^e  
    -0;{  
    WRbdv{ 1E  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 -@w}}BR  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented ,H?e23G  
    DsxNg  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 4@F8-V3q4  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 $Sy}im\H  
        N@Ap|`Ei  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!