切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19980阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview (Lc%G~{  
    !({[^[!  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability ]$7|1-&Y  
    }\9qN!ol  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools (* p |Kzu  
    n9#@ e}r  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses gG#M-2P  
    ?O28Q DUI  
    User Interface Qml<JF  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only rx%lL  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous (*#S%4(YX  
    J"|o g|Tz  
    Modeling &n['#7 <(!  
    Most elements cannot be edited QqRL>.)W  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 0(]C$*~mk  
    No unboolean capability ?(E$|A  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time fi1tF/ `  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses oB+drDp8U  
    caS5>wk`R  
    Ray Trace .|!Kv+yD  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace w?Y;pc}1B  
    No point sources; no volume sources dtJ?J<m}  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) yH irm|o  
    c1c8):o+V  
    Analysis l7\Bq+Q  
    No illumination error estimate L~>pSP^a  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” A3MVNz$wo"  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres x:GuqE  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro ("?V|  
    "|`euxYV  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro ogtl UCUD  
    Interactive ray trace zr2oU '+  
    Editable geometry 4YMX;W  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) E {*d`n  
    OF-$*  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented "=@X>jUc  
    3D textures ^-Bx zOp  
    Source definition q-}q rg  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist b@`h]]~:  
    NCL!|  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition gM>geWB<  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface Y`3V&8X  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) wl7G6Y2  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities LD/NMb  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) db#svj*  
    qjDt6B^RO  
    TracePro features not in LT stQRl_('  
    Ray trace through GRIN material %\$~B?At  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP Ui|z#{8&  
    n37P$0  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT O pavno%&  
    < #FxI  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT N(s5YX7<hd  
    Q-<h)WTA  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) lV".-:u_  
    =hY9lxW  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT '2XIeR  
    G9_7jX*  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) g^I?u$&E  
    y7^E`LKK  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP z=/&tRe W  
    u4x>gRz)  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons []:&WA 9N  
    L8,/  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP d0V*[{  
    +?)R}\\  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software .no<#l  
    H7FOf[3'  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools w?V;ItcL  
    U4=m>Ty  
    A01PEVd@A  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 >N~orSw%  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented 1>=%TIO)  
    6L"b O'_5K  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 )=nB32~J"  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 'i <%kL@  
        jr(|-!RVMN  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!