切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19860阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview $j? zEz  
    |X:"AH"S  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability iTf]Pd'  
    I<p- o/TP  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools 5U[m]W=B  
    "`l8*]z  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses XxXMtiZ6  
    v<+5B5"1  
    User Interface /G}TPXA  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only \]bAXa{ p  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous 2$G,pT1J  
    ;[pY>VJ(  
    Modeling vwA d6Tm  
    Most elements cannot be edited 9|y?jb5im  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) NJ 6* 7Cd  
    No unboolean capability L[M`LZpJo  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time 9 b?Nlk8d  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses &x= PAu  
    =t,}I\_^c  
    Ray Trace (c^ZFh2]  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace HN7C+e4U~  
    No point sources; no volume sources /j}"4_. 8  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) CFo>D\*J  
    ~57.0?IK  
    Analysis uH"W07  
    No illumination error estimate (P=q&]l[  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” 1?!z<<  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres \piHdVD  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro gGdt&9z %  
    !:zWhu,  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro HutwgPvy  
    Interactive ray trace kimqm  
    Editable geometry JZc"4qf@OT  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) p bRU"   
    e#R'_}\yj  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 5:" zs  
    3D textures -~PiPYX  
    Source definition G]NnGL<xk  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist Vm_<eyI2  
    Zo12F**{  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition {Xj2c]A1  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface = nIl$9  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) krt8yAkG  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities \H6[6*JuB  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) ug?])nO.C  
    Lt<KRs  
    TracePro features not in LT  + f+#W  
    Ray trace through GRIN material W)OoHpdw  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP fc,^H&  
    xklXV  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT M8,_E\*  
    .5ItH^  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT reU*apZ/  
    p,cw- lN  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) 8B|qNf `Yi  
    Z'@a@Y+  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT '9w.~@7  
    uFXu9f+  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) (mvzGXNz4  
    l+V#`S*q  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP `g~T #U\>d  
    DjK  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons >U2[]fu  
    1~|o@CO  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP r\x"nS  
    h M/:zC:  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software HpQuro'Qh  
    2y"|l  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools jIOrB}  
    ujt0?DM  
    pod=|(c  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 lJR  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented #K[UqJ+x  
    vp#AD9h1  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 (oKrIm  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 MeSF,*lP  
        zt23on2  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!