切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20022阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview z))rk vL%  
    T|p%4hH  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability 9* P-k.Bl  
    OaKr_m  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools Pv|sPIIB7  
    JkI|Ojmm/  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses _q4Yq'dI  
    j )wrF@W  
    User Interface Kpkpr`:)]  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only 3lbGG42:  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous ve\@u@K^  
    ^9]g5.z:  
    Modeling TEla?N  
    Most elements cannot be edited oBs5xH7@-  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) \~r_S  
    No unboolean capability MwX8FYF D  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time e0]#vqdO  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses 3v&Shb?xb;  
    1d$wP$  
    Ray Trace S~W;Ld<>fB  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace !=HxL-`j  
    No point sources; no volume sources -c{Y+M`  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) r*ziO#[  
    t*fH&8(  
    Analysis )(rr1^Xer  
    No illumination error estimate : rudo[L  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” %TO&  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres 3T>6Q#W5eO  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro #ApmJLeCO  
    ztAC3,r]  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro +:Nz_l  
    Interactive ray trace e.Jaq^Gw|  
    Editable geometry 9ph>4u(R  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) ZXf& pqmG  
    C' WX$!$d  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented zn0%%x+!g  
    3D textures ~@e=+Z  
    Source definition ;iQw2XhT  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist "*S_wN%  
    ScQ9p379  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition - /cf3  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface r1z+yx  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) Z`Jt6QgW  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities hpq\  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) A;e"_$yt8  
    bxWzm|  
    TracePro features not in LT +i}uRO  
    Ray trace through GRIN material uH7!)LE#  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP AbQ nx%$u  
    ?B`c <H"  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT H> n;[  
    !<F5W <V  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT -I z,vd  
    hVCxwTg^X  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) .R#<Q  
    q4vHsy36  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT X|4Kdi.r@  
    ty@D3l  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) NFG~PZ`6R  
    VkId6k:>6C  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP A6xN6{R!  
    DZ:$p.  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons gRw? <U^  
    B9`_~~^U5  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP =`!# V/=  
    }_Y\6fcd  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software Z5*O\kJv  
    ~F;>4q   
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools !$Arc^7r  
    bV*q~ @xh  
    mE9ytFH\k  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 5X^`qUSv  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented D e$K  
    2W/*1K}  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 JK'tdvs~  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 .G/RQn]x}  
        , lBHA+@  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!