切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20091阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview -@wnQ?  
    j#`d%eQ~J  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability @y#QHJ.j  
    .7!n%Ks  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools ^YpA@`n  
    ?-"%%#  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses E>BP b  
    *acN/Ca1  
    User Interface 0NN{2"M$p  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only BZXP%{njS  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous GQNs:oRJ'  
    78s:~|WB<{  
    Modeling B"-gK20vY  
    Most elements cannot be edited y11/:|  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) ; FO1b*  
    No unboolean capability L=. 4x=%%  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time UeG$lMV  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses FBjIft5e  
    v;E7UL .w  
    Ray Trace d(>7BV  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace .b4_O CGg  
    No point sources; no volume sources `ym@ U(;N  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) FkdG@7Xf  
    p0KkPE">p4  
    Analysis $J/Z~ (=JT  
    No illumination error estimate #?xhfSgr  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” %$b)l? !  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres [<)/ c>Y  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro _P!J0  
    pV#~$e  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro +Y!9)~f}7X  
    Interactive ray trace m6BIQ(l  
    Editable geometry Zho d%n3  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) / r#.BXP  
    DnA}!s  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented XEF|B--,  
    3D textures '`q&UPg]  
    Source definition (F$V m  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist hKw4[wB]  
    :\x)`lu  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition ^Bw2y&nN  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface BN&^$1F((  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 5qkG~ YO-  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities }EmNSs`$r  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) =[!&&,c=  
    5V&3m@d0aq  
    TracePro features not in LT "?|sC{'C4j  
    Ray trace through GRIN material vn@9Sqk  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP WpE\N0Yg  
    R]e?<,"X  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT PSz|I8 c  
    P.WEu<$  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT g+oSbC  
    M XsSF|-  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) sf4NKe2*  
    6@?4z Rkz  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT ; F% 3b47  
    RnV )*  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) x 5vvY  
    A{mv[x-XN  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP ohqi4Y!j/~  
    -@{5 u d  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons ) -x0xY  
    lB9 9J"A  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP "w.gP8`  
    e ?FjN 9  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 4Cs |F7R  
    H1iewsfzH  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools qKu/~0a/  
    [w&B>z=g$  
    M4[(.8iE  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 C;]}Ht:~I  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented #[$^M:X.  
    ~JhH ,E  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 \ vf&Ldk  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 ?:DeOBAb  
        E Dh$UB)  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!