切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19747阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview Dz<vIMLF{  
    L%31>)8  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability Qt"i  
    VY j pl  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools p{w:^l(  
    >L,Pw1Y0W[  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses '=cAdja  
    Ry"N_Fb  
    User Interface VZCCMh-  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only P"<,@Mn  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous hDD]Kc;G^1  
    \!s0H_RJY  
    Modeling d5l].%~  
    Most elements cannot be edited lj"72   
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) cp L'  
    No unboolean capability ?~WDl j3  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time LseS8F/q  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses <XH,kI(%  
    VTs ,Ln!,U  
    Ray Trace $-"V 2  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace 0)E`6s#M  
    No point sources; no volume sources i3U_G^8  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) +=g9T`YbE  
    nYts[f9e  
    Analysis Y!fgc<]'&  
    No illumination error estimate 4=7h1qex  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” } .'\IR  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres %TS8 9/  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro 9P\R?~3  
    iw0|A  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro ZFa<{J<2  
    Interactive ray trace M\)(_I)V=  
    Editable geometry )sG/H8  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) CZ}%\2>-v  
    a@niig  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented UY`U[#  
    3D textures OVhtU+r  
    Source definition )&wJ_ (z  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist Yb=Z `)  
    Z!SFJ{  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition :+$/B N:iO  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface >TB Rp,;r  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) y)#=8oci  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities O [v(kH'  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) _MST8  
    s7G!4en  
    TracePro features not in LT M?m)<vMr*  
    Ray trace through GRIN material 2%gLq  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP v''F\V )  
    n1 kh8,  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT siK:?A@4D  
    ac< hz0   
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT mjXO}q7  
    ~ $QNp#dq  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) 0Er;l|  
    (J,^)!g7  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT , \ 6*fXc  
     %3A~&  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) :rhh=nHgn  
    \Cz uf   
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP -lNT"9  
    R#w9%+  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons B`1"4[{  
    /+{]?y,  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP [yf&]0  
    zb=L[2;  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 2,.;Mdl  
    PShluhY  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools xKW`m  
    hfQx$cv6  
    Se>"=[=  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 oGa8#>  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented ->29Tns  
    ?!d\c(5Gt  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 NP_b~e6O=  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 ,OilGTQ#  
        =SqI# v  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!