切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 20049阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview `-\JjMSQ1  
    +N!{(R:"v}  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability Sgy~Z^  
    j;vaNg|vQ  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools ~1!kU 4  
    HAdm,  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Fje%hcV  
    ?2Dz1#%D  
    User Interface s2kynQ#a  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only ?Fw/c0  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous 9_$Odc%]  
    ttRH[[E(  
    Modeling hR{Zh>  
    Most elements cannot be edited V&85<Y%Nl|  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) W5{e.eI}|  
    No unboolean capability 1j(,VW  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time |-<L :%  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses =7> ~u  
    @TDcj~oR ?  
    Ray Trace c i>=45@J  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace <hdCO< 0(  
    No point sources; no volume sources gw^+[}U#  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) @YELqUb*  
    MN4}y5  
    Analysis Y#,MFEd  
    No illumination error estimate ualtIHXK)  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” O'(vs"eN  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres hd' n"  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro lVHJ}(<'p  
    sBMHf9u  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro 7_,X9^z  
    Interactive ray trace ;d4_l:9p  
    Editable geometry kCV OeXv  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) $9/r*@bu8d  
    q6dq@   
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented VTU-'q  
    3D textures Wu(GC]lTG  
    Source definition vbp)/I-h  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist OB%y'mo7]  
    ?(z3/ "g]  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition N*#SY$!y  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface i \~4W$4I  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) 827N?pU$)  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities :BS`Q/<w  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) '@FKgy;B)-  
    [(hENX}o :  
    TracePro features not in LT wC19  
    Ray trace through GRIN material .dV!du  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP UU_k"D~  
    XX =A1#H  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT I?=Q *og  
    F n\)*; ^  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT u}$?r\H'(  
    ?Gb 18m  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) #/aWG  x_  
    :mij%nQ>$  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT M:A7=rO~  
    g#e"BBm=A  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) _$\T;m>'A  
    rei<{woX  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP /2c?+04+  
    KF.?b]  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons [p(Y|~  
    8u>E(Vmpu  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP +m"iJW0  
    RtSk;U1  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 1iUy*p65:  
    {pVD`#Tl[  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools h5F1mr1Sa  
    c| E  
    oYu5]ry  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 b.$Gc!g  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented MVV<&jho{^  
    Fd2zvi  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 xD1w#FMlQs  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 u ; I5n  
        &D/_@\ 0  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!