切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19938阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview z"L/G  
    %QGC8Tz  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability ;O6;.5q&  
    t;Sb/3  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools *uf'zQ<9  
    Q7\w+ANf0  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses vn!3l1\+J  
    ^z IW+:  
    User Interface O)*+="Rg  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only 9gDkTYkj  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous 4#xDgxg\f  
    ?m}s4a  
    Modeling W)2p@j59A  
    Most elements cannot be edited :Zbg9`d*  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) )._;~z!  
    No unboolean capability OmpND{w  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time A@[o;H}XP  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses ZF9z~9  
    Z, Yb&b  
    Ray Trace {j?FNOJn  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace 5h=}j  
    No point sources; no volume sources vjGo;+K  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) yy^q2P  
    kW Ml  
    Analysis |&+ o^  
    No illumination error estimate 9k '7832u  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” &tLgG4pd  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres d9f C<Tp  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro 3=P]x ;[ba  
    'j8:vq^d  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro w7.V6S$Ga  
    Interactive ray trace C\Wmq [  
    Editable geometry *k(XW_>  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) #C74z$  
    YW,tCtI0_  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented vAF "n  
    3D textures Q^9_' t}X  
    Source definition ;40/yl3r3[  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist hc(#{]].  
    Uou1mZz/  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition WtsFz*`)y  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface g#pr yYz  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) T9E+\D  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities 93 )sk/j  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) 5FPM`hLT  
    F`9xVnK=  
    TracePro features not in LT :\`o8`  
    Ray trace through GRIN material #>("CAB02T  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP XB;7!8|  
    !3c\NbU  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT [x=s(:qy  
    e9Wa<i 8  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT )Yh+c=6 ?  
    &.)^ %Tp\z  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) Fj8z  
    xC?6v '  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT wv>^0\o  
    ]NQfX[  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) xjUT{iwS  
    g{]0sn#  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP Y #ap*  
    3V+] 9;  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons R"/GQ`^AqA  
    p}}R-D&K  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP )W,aN)1)  
    nK1Slg#U  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software D=A&+6B@-  
    F/,NDZN  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools RN1y^`  
    /* (Kr'c  
    j7Yu>cr  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 f=+mIZ  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented ; }I:\P  
    '&P%C" 5  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 ?> 9/#Nv  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 + )AG*  
        d(ZO6Nr Q  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    157
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!