切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19387阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview b7HS 3NYk  
    fFiFc^  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability G!%1<SLi.  
    E7y<iaA{~  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools ?EKYKLwr  
    p2tB F98  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Q +qN`  
    RYmk6w!w  
    User Interface S1zV.]  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only 1\_4# @')  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous "jb?P$  
    FWPkvL  
    Modeling IOt!A  
    Most elements cannot be edited ]Kil/Y  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) @l BR;B"  
    No unboolean capability zn@tLLX  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time nqy\xK#.^  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses / ijj;9EB  
    \)`\F$CF  
    Ray Trace #%B1, .A  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace }fL8<HM\'c  
    No point sources; no volume sources F5{~2~Cw(  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) Q]7r?nEEhW  
    Z}$.Tm  
    Analysis ,8EeSnI  
    No illumination error estimate W<v?D6dFq  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” - C8 h$P  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres n%@xnB $ZX  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro B1J+`R3OX  
    W!V06.  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro NuW9.6$Jrf  
    Interactive ray trace \Qz>us=G  
    Editable geometry NTls64AS.  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) qEX59v  
    _sJp"4?  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented =`Nnd@3v  
    3D textures C5 ^_R  
    Source definition {Km|SG[-q  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist )6^b\`  
    \D>'  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition ke'p8Gz  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface ,1RW}1n  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) E}.cz\!.  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities wW]|ElYR=  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) rXo,\zI;u^  
    YtxBkKiJ2V  
    TracePro features not in LT hFs0qPVY  
    Ray trace through GRIN material R qOEQ*k  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP jQ1~B1(  
    X}h{xl   
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT #^%Rk'W  
    ?)5}v4b  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT f.Q?-M  
    (gs"2  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) z2wR]G5!  
    x]Q+M2g?  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT |o|0qG@g  
    R8O<} >3a  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) /M\S^ !g@  
    2p(K0PtX  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP b;Q cBGwKT  
    (y=P-nm  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons ?N&"WL^|  
    D@7\Fg  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP 4$1sBY/  
    rq T@i(i  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software CYes'lr  
    cQS}pQyYN  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools ){icI <  
    \6 2|w HX  
    UXR$7<D+  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 0waQw7 E  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented Qm^N}>e  
    ,d&~#W]  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 `?2S4lN/  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 !!DHfAV]  
        mWfzL'*  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!