[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: qRXb9c  
XwKB+Yj0  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) cxBu2(Y  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Jww LAQ5  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 > .L\>  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 >tfy\PY:  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 z\zmAus  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 R<}n?f\#JZ  
,&Iw5E[  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: `(j}2X'[  
=d#3& R]p  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT)
Iu`B7UOF  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 #!,tI
d  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 JFw<Po,MEa  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 zY@|KV"^r  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 $0[T=9q <+  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 bAIo5lr  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 :Gyv%>.  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 qq0bIfF\4  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! )24r^21.q  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 !\wdX7%
 
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德