[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: @P[Tu; 4  
ym
<G.3%1  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) rzEE|  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Bd)Qz(>rw  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 =U3!D;XP  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 H@5:
x8  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 d-39G*;1  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 n16,u$|  
D|6prC%/  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: 0^?(;AK  
VfAIx]Fa  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) >-c;  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 IM7k\  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 $DJp|
(8  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 :L&-
  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 K%1'zSAyK  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 F!tn|!~  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ,H'O`oV!1E  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 %o.{h  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! s(q\!\FS  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 ^P >; %  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德