[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: (&qjY I  
z5t"o !  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) ^j7]> I  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 $!
:xjb  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 9w$+Qc  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 4z,n:>oH  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 nY_+V{F  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 %~qY\>  
mA6Nmq%{ F  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: ]
$?\,`  
D``>1IA]  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) y7Sj^muBY  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 b0R{cj=<[  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 \9s x_T  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ~3s\Q%   
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Com`4>0>I  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 2Jc9}|,  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 {]dH+J7  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 9>HCt*|_8  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! K:g:GEDgf  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 f!"Y"g:@E  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德