[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: SKf[&eP,G  
{Noa4i  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) E'J| p7  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Y"U -Rc  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Zg@NMT  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 b1A8 -![  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 u\-f\Z7  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 -r!N; s$t  
LOkNDmj  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: G}d-L!YbE'  
JpEE'#r|  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) WHQg6r  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 :=BFx"Y
  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ,F7W_f# @3  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 TC80nP   
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 >;eWgQ6V  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 l+'@y (}Q  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 5Xu2MY=  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 1D03Nbh|5  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! F?#^wm5TZ  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 Kvx~2ZMx6  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德