[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: 6o~g3{O
w  
B*n_ VBd  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) N\85fPSMG|  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 $"fO/8Ex  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 Za7!n{?0  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ?6 "B4%
7b  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 J/\^3rCB  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 D{M&>.  
`2n%Lo?_  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: 8WLBq-]G  
8 G:f[\^  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) 0w?G&jjNtM  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 /C/I_S}H  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 c:`CL<xzU  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 EOG&Xa  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 LteZ7e  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 rl:D>t(:.  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 HA3d9`  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 $zJ!L  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! Zxn>
]Z_  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 uEDvdd#V.  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德