[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: ]jRfH(i  
8sK9G` k  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) ji,kkipY?w  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 q6X1P"%.  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 F1Bq$*'N$w  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 :T(|&F[(  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ?@ $r  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 8SS|a  
Q.c\/&  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: Y,zxbXZv'5  
Nf1-!u7  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) h>OfOx/{q9  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ~zNAbaC+>t  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 N^:9Fz  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 1c{DY  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 xe&i^+i  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 @/-\k*T  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 l8#EM1g-  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 3n}?bY8@5_  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! 6-B|Y3)B  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 X1-'COQS%&  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德