[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: f(
-
3d*g  
BQ!_i*14+  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) t$uj(y>  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 lYrW"(2  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 M;0\fUh;  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 lR]SGdY  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ?d)eri8,  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ).r04)/  
*&F~<HC2+  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: S-KHot ?  
$n@B:kv5p  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) G^/8lIj  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 dgM@|&9*m  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 'z3I*[!  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 X=i",5;  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 |4|j5<5  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 d;O4)8>  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 YA%0{Tdxz  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 "AUHe6Yv  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! Cu&y',ee~  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 +*L<"@  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德