[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: "CMucK  
"mR*7o$|  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) B_hPcmB  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 nWk e#{[  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 n&$/Q$d&  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 5Dd:r{{ Q  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 LX\)8~dp  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 z|I0-1tAK  
Fwb5u!_,  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: Z9[+'ZWt  
z:}nBCmLV  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) +qy6d7^  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Ilq=wPD}j  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 2hq\n<  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 >{nH v)  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 cbYK5fj"T  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 5JSrrpGr
 
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 G3a7`CD  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 dYF=c  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! h{'t5&yY  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 X[3}?,aqL  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德