[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients:
QK?V^E  
ij!d-eM/b  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) 'x{oAtCP9  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000
>#$SaG!  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 J/'Fj?
 
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 OA*O =
 
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 W]#w4Fp!  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 W,NqevXo:  
e)wi}\:q_  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: + f67y  
D!~ Y"4<  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) p-}X=O$  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 i]r(VKX  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 3[[oAp  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 cF8 2wg  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 Rlewp8?LB  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 .2fvRN92  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 JJd qdX;  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 2'?'dfj  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! [Fr](&Tx  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 ]\M{Abqd{  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德