[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: 73'U#@g6  
,[Dh2fPM,  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT)
):/<H  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 3~cS}N T  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ,maAw}=  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 3g?MEM~  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 >k$[hk*~  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 ?l)}
E  
C1ZFA![  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: r|JiGj^om  
*0Wi^f  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) 1A`?y& Ll  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 wB1|r{  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 q/rHHuY}  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 q[y,J  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 rHC+nou  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 <WHs  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 S2At$47v  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 QigoRB!z#9  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! [vjkU7;7A  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 \7tvNa,C  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德