切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16530阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 Oi l>bv8  
    <J`_Qc8C  
    dbnH#0i  
    AS4m227  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 Z(U&0GH`  
    qxd{c8  
    u%ih7v!r\  
    D.$EvUSK<.  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: !M3IuDN  
    t@)~{W {  
    Analysis of Tolerances hhYo9jTHW  
    (m.]0v*&c  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX |Zkcs]8M!  
    Title: h1)p{ 5}H  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 i.K}(bo;b  
    dqd Qt_  
    Units are Millimeters. YMqL,& Q{1  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. azOp53zR  
    ojyG|Y  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. 5zEl`h  
    r("7 X2f  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. F!aYK2  
    5<d Y,FvX  
    Mnemonics: p'xj:bB  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. hkW"D<i i-  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. :4)mv4Q  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. TzX>d<x  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. 5'oWd e  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). G?jY>;P)  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). Z\dILt:#z  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). NK"y@)%0  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. : PQA9U|  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. 3OM\R%M  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. i<%(Z[9Lk  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). /vU9eh"%  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). Do2y7,jv  
    iW |]-Ba\  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. .l#Pmd!  
    D:.^]o[  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. mv30xcc  
    )NyGV!Zuu  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm Zsf<)Vx  
    Mode                : Sensitivities ugMJ}IGq  
    Sampling            : 2 QW~o+N~~  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 +.>O%pNj  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 KZD&Ih(vC  
    M5P63=1+  
    uOougSBV,  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees  hi.{  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY 3c-ve$8u~  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 xES+m/?KlZ  
    %f:'A%'Qb  
    Sensitivity Analysis: hpAIIgn  
    -,XS2[  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| fnB-?8K<  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change gb@!Co3  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 )FU4iN)ei  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 S!.xmc\  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 &s] s]V)  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 1f}S:Z  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 [a+?z6qI\}  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 +S3'ms  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 c~$ipX   
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 tgrQ$Yjk  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 -R&h?ec  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 XWB>' UDQ#  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 YW/<. 0rI  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 BE3~f6 `  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 e3(0L I  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 L^ +0K}eD  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 *w@>zkBl  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 Dvx"4EA{7{  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 4J I;NN  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 `w~ 9/sty  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 0Fi7|  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 ~t#'X8.)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 } 8r+&e  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) KTf!Pf?g  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 *[vf47)r!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 />f`X+d  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) kg !@i7  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 v`v+M4upC  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 4|XE f,  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 | sQ5`lV?  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671  OSSMIPr  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5[Q44$a{  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 8PQ$X2)  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 ?G8 D6  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Sfvi|kZX  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 IE,g  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 1TbKnmTx  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 jj.yB#T  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 aC%0jJ<eo  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 />$)o7U`+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 :$9 4y{  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 H M76%9!  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 bk>M4l61  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 G1P m!CM=  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 moc_}(  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 ?=PQQx2_*u  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 MJ7!f+!5  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 rc;| ,\  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 $jw!DrE  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 g8vN^nQf[  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 u' r ;-|7  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 DU[UGJg  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 - 6  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 6.By)L  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 QY{f=  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ^Yn6kF  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 2&=;$2?}  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 "3\)@  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 "@Te!.~A.  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 b"f4}b  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 b$B5sKQ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 9MGA#a  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 TuX#;!p6  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 F oEZ1O<  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 zlXkD~GV  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes "+)ey> _  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 s2d;601*b  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 YjsaTdZ!&  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes 9|OQHy  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 qkR.{?x  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Tl25t^Y  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes ZegsV|  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 A70_hhP  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 KK7Y"~ 9&-  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 AWf zMJ;VS  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 Z0-W%W  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 a_pkUOu6  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 [#)$BXG~y  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 d/* [t!   
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 Fl|u0SY  
    !H.&"~w@  
    Worst offenders: HPU7 `b4  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change H]}- U8}sp  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 R?I(f(ib   
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 0gt/JI($  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 5V%K'a(  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ^]Gt<_  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851  snN1  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 w0Us8JNGz  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 a+J :1'  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 &<v# ^2S3  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 (hmasy6hM  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 Ar>Om!]=v  
    =3& WH0  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: v 7Pv&|  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 <H#D/?n5  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 *h]qh20t  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 9l(e:_`_  
    C#vh2'  
    Compensator Statistics: Y`c\{&M6  
    Change in back focus: %PyU3  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 C~6aX/:  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 hbN*_[  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 ~A"ODLgU9  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 N*@bJ*0  
    s7&% _!4  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: a0AIq44  
    Number of trials: 20 <Oy%  
    auS$B %  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution i8A5m@,G  
    F,4Q  
      Trial       Criterion        Change #%+IU  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 I80.|KIv  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 qjTz]'^BpM  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 ! 4i  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 N}s[0s  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 r:YAn^Lg  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 S0"O U0`N  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 T@k&YJ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 ty/jTo}  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 \`4}h[  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 n>!E ]  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 +IJpqFH  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 9}3W0F;  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 zW+Y{^hf  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 MA"iM+Ar  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 v "oO  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 a}e7Q<cGj  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 \'1%"JWK   
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 .R:eN&Y 8y  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 ,j2qY'wi  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 A6#ob  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 {feS-.Khv  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 ,riwxl5*E/  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 h2,A cM  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 I,?bZ&@8  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 u}#rS%SF*  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 9lny[{9  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 g]jtVQH']  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 cL=P((<K?  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 0aGfz=V&  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 >} aykz*g  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 ]kKf4SJZFU  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 fpoH7Jd V  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 t7-sCC0  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 U7:~@eYy  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 @W^g(I(w  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 '}XW  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 FeCQGT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 3ON]c13  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 $H5PB' b  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 `cZG&R  
    SxQ|1:i%  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 :  l]>nF4  
    ;z%& 3u/  
    Nominal     0.54403234 o AQ92~b  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 %/'[GC'y!  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 Ke,-8e#Q  
    Mean        0.35770970 "~FXmKcX  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 oWJ}]ip  
    w7%N=hL1   
    ~2"|4  
    Compensator Statistics: kZn!]TseN  
    Change in back focus: MjG .Ili$m  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 ;1eu8N8  
    Maximum            :         1.611296  H) (K  
    Mean               :         0.161872 wmoOp;C  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 sIELkF?.  
    E}a3.6)p  
    90% >       0.20977951               $_)f|\s  
    80% >       0.22748071               A+[wH(  
    50% >       0.38667627               I>P</TE7  
    20% >       0.46553746               e3[QM  
    10% >       0.50064115                g%\e80~1(  
    ;$0za]x  
    End of Run. j^64:3  
    MvRuW:  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 h[B Ft{x  
    }1$8)zH  
    Ex*g>~e  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 s )To#  
    s:fnOMv "  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 Wh4lz~D\@  
    80% >       0.22748071                 |L+GM"hg  
    50% >       0.38667627                 pF8'S{y  
    20% >       0.46553746                 $iF7hyZ  
    10% >       0.50064115 1w5p*U0 ;  
    PH=wP ft  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? k}<mmKB  
    0\ gE^=o[  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   C3memimN  
    9PR&/Q F5  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : u4Xrvfb,  
    90% >       0.20977951                 1f~D Uku=  
    80% >       0.22748071                 vu*08<M~i|  
    50% >       0.38667627                 \C>I6{  
    20% >       0.46553746                 t[DXG2&  
    10% >       0.50064115 H- S28%.  
    ....... 9EH%[wfv  
    .vb*|So  
    3|~(9b{+  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   uL1-@D,  
    Mode                : Sensitivities @F=4B0=  
    Sampling            : 2 `zTVup&  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 le1'r>E$  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 T}zOM%]]  
    ~Ipl'cE  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? z5Po,@W  
    4s3n|6v  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试