切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 15365阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 tYk!Y/O}  
    E|K|AdL  
    `Q!#v{  
    1KMSBLx  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 51Q m2,P1^  
    O,[9E  
    ,vh $G 7D  
    TCLXO0  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: ;xQNa}"V  
    WZQ EBXs  
    Analysis of Tolerances :AYhBhitC  
    5I6u 2k3  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX .dO8I/lhV  
    Title: -FGM>~x  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 *mjPNp'3{m  
    q\n,/#'i~  
    Units are Millimeters. M->BV9  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. c2RQwtN|  
    {bP )Fon  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. !Pc&Sg  
    Fxx -2(U  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. Z4s+8cTHn  
    i1 >oRT{Z  
    Mnemonics: o6/"IIso3  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. EGysA{o"X  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. NyR,@n1  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. 9q]n &5  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. ]J^/`gc  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). \#sdN#e;XA  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). 7SJbrOL4Q-  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). wM1&_%N  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. C7=N`s}  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. =1+/`w  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. <]f{X<ef  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). ~Z:)Y*  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). @:Emmzucv|  
    vI20G89E  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. P}=U #AV4  
    hlBMRx49  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. g-4j1yJV<  
    `>Ms7G9S~e  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm .x'?&7#(  
    Mode                : Sensitivities p|>m 2(|  
    Sampling            : 2 nt_FqUJ  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 +yI2G! $T9  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 >+9:31p  
    pCC3r t(  
    p5aqlYb6r  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees -)Hc^'.  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY :X}fXgeL  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 D!V~g72j  
    ^6QzaC3  
    Sensitivity Analysis: `O]$FpO  
    RqKkB8g  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| L0;XzZ S  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change j;J`P H  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 - VdCj%r>  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 ~wQ M ?h  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 M=54xTh0Y  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 NpH9}, 1i  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 :;jRAjq"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 kjF4c6v  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 TF?~vS%@P  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 K SJ Ko  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 '?Xf(6o1  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 5fy{!  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 NQcNY=  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 a Z8f>t1Q  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 c-**~tb(  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 B9wQ;[gQB  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 T>|Y_3YO_a  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 N, ,[V  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 x~ID[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 u s8.nL/  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 Gi\Z"MiBZ  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 8~sC$sIlE  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 >*EJ6FPO  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) Rh%A^j@  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 +k V$ @qH  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 JfRLqA/  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) ?e\u_3- 9  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 LbuhKL}VN  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 q ,+29  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 Y?- "HK:  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 a@-bw4S D  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 3G'cDemc  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1  &\ K  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 ;B !p4 hu  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 I#'yy7J  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 +R_s(2vz  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 {I/t3.R`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 d4)0G-|  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 "5v^6R9e  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Lb?0<  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 b#*"eZj  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 })j N 8px  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 >`<qa!9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 $h[Q }uW  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 U,lO{J[T  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 z'*{V\  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 y(O~=S+<  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 /4}y2JVv)  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 -"I9`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 jhkX U+4  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 4?]s%2U6  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 @+a}O  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 nd[Ja_h  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 GcG$>&,  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 Z*IW*f&0>1  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 1k`gr&S  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 1@9M[_<n5  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 >*\yEH9"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 mC3:P5/c  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 D~M*]&  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 f ~bgZ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 h gu\~}kD  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 ^])s\a$  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 t#%J=zF{  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 !}sF#  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes v5&W)F  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 N36B*9m&p  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 cM\BEh h  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes Kw2]J)TO  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 ENI|e,'[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 )-h{0o  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes ]=59_bkD:s  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 9i D&y)$"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 E(&zH;?_  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 [[xnp;-;  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 h>p,r\X  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ],vid1E  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 V{ ~~8b1E  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 _#uRKy<`N  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 HBs 6:[q  
    93ggCOaYA  
    Worst offenders: k=G c#SD5_  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change _Fe=:q  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 V;Q@' <w  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 MP.ye|i4Q  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 @!|h!p;  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 5kADvi.  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 G_5w5dbG  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 d[*NDMO  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 L">m2/ HG  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 zy.v[Y1!  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 @, AB 2D  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 s>[Oe|`  
    HGi%b5:<=M  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: LR'~:46#u  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 $"k1^&&E  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 =LEzcq>XO  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 !& >LLZ  
    ad52a3deR  
    Compensator Statistics: ;iJ}[HUo  
    Change in back focus: kBY#= e).  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 3>=G-AH/$K  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 !3o/c w9  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 P7REE_<1  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 &B++ "f  
    [?(qhp!  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: j 20m Z  
    Number of trials: 20 *Wcq'S  
    7M_GGjP  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution t}MT<Jj  
    uKB V`I  
      Trial       Criterion        Change \`%#SmQF  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 !!m GsgnW  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 z6h/C {  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 1^[]#N-Bu  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 ju4wU; Nu  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 +vPCr&40  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 }.=@^-JBA5  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 '*t<g@2$  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 ]iZ-MG)J  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 @&9< )1F  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 xsrdHP1  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 [|YJg]i-  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 T(k:\z/  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 6)FM83zk)K  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 vkW;qt}yO  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 z5sKV7&\[n  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 f917F.1 I  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 a t=;}}X  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 =,08D^xY  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 1KJ[&jS ]  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 `qZ@eGZ z  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 'lgS) m  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 |Z$)t%'  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 v{8r46Y~Z)  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 Lo" s12fr  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 U]ZI_[\'U  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 W=2]!%3#  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 #rp)Gc  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 En0hjXa  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 u:,B&}j  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 9A}y^=!`  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 9$%S<v  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 $us7fuKE  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 +Lo,*  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 *P`k|-  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 ~Q=^YZgn8  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 ESe$6)P  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 4 X0ku]  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 ,{Z!T5 |  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 /EL3Tt  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 c{jTCkzq  
    e C&!yY2g  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 Owh:(EJ"d  
    lW]&a"1$  
    Nominal     0.54403234 T3-/+4$0v  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 )=0@4   
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 qf%p#+:B3  
    Mean        0.35770970 5L\Im^  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 U{HBmSR  
    ;|oem\dKv  
    yQC8Gt8  
    Compensator Statistics: }w)wW1&  
    Change in back focus: jfZ)  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 X\BdN Hr  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 GEki34 n0  
    Mean               :         0.161872  f^[m~  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 Nh6!h%  
    0EC/l OS  
    90% >       0.20977951               yeV|j\TJI.  
    80% >       0.22748071               \K:?#07Wj4  
    50% >       0.38667627               `QT9W-0e^  
    20% >       0.46553746               )N&95\ u  
    10% >       0.50064115                Wix4se1Ac  
    .?r} 3Ch  
    End of Run. B> zQ[e@t  
    u/5)Yx+5_  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 PxJvE*6^H  
    @$?*UI6y  
    >W'"xK|:  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 ,go$ 6  
    Wk]E6yz6  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 iMp_1EXe  
    80% >       0.22748071                 8jgamG  
    50% >       0.38667627                 [S[@ Q[zP@  
    20% >       0.46553746                 @Y+9")?  
    10% >       0.50064115 HQrx9CXE  
    < #7j~<  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? ~@K!>j  
    N`5 mPE  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   [L>AU; :  
    ngH_p>  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : 2 1]8 7$  
    90% >       0.20977951                 w&^_2<a2  
    80% >       0.22748071                 ".T&nS[z  
    50% >       0.38667627                 cAc>p-y%  
    20% >       0.46553746                  oN7JNMT  
    10% >       0.50064115 u.L{3gkT  
    ....... ) v^;"q"  
    lq\/E`fc`  
    OMVK\_oXo  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   \<K@t=/ 6  
    Mode                : Sensitivities +Pm yFJH  
    Sampling            : 2 r^|AiYI)  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 0755;26Bx  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 O4i5 fVy{  
    WGeTL`}dh  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? N-4k 9l1  
    xVn"xk  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试