切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 15218阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 m&(%&}g  
    \a9D[wk;@  
    vCYSm  0  
    V!jK3vc  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 $4#=#aKW.  
    Vq?8u/  
    Z{8exym  
    S&gKgQD"Q  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: ;HD 4~3   
    5#N"WHz!  
    Analysis of Tolerances ir( -$*J  
    |>jqH @\P  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX $cp16  
    Title: . x\/XlM  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 %Q>~7P  
    "^e}C@  
    Units are Millimeters. {7j6$.7J$&  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. Q 37V!  
    ]x5(bnW x  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. \Nh^Ig   
    ?Oe_} jv;  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. fwar8 i1  
    \ (3Qqbw  
    Mnemonics: |e.3FjTH  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. '? !7 Be  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. w[J (E  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. P|!/mu]  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. Q8M:7#ySji  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). Ah8^^h|TPJ  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). r P<d[u  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). `CTkx?e[  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. Y3sNr)qss  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. 6@,'m  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. TV[6+i*#  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). zO7lsx2 =  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). 2s]]!{Z#  
    *h5ldP  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. !`d832  
    inq4CGY  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. nEZ-h7lzl(  
    /o}0oo5B  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm A{u\8-u  
    Mode                : Sensitivities m`1}O"<&i  
    Sampling            : 2 nJM9c[Ou^H  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 *BP\6"X  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 -h^} jP8  
    E-7a`S  
    jmZ|b6  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees #4|i@0n}D  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY >8Yrmq  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 D^T7pO  
    Pvb+   
    Sensitivity Analysis: eA~_)-Z-  
    d q+7K  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| :n%sU* 'T  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change (VF4FC  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 y1jGf83  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 9DP75 ti  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 Pc\4 QvQ8  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 b`={s  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 dBD4ogo1  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 v#YS`];B  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 ovBd%wJ 0  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 f >, Qhl  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 0o^#Fmuz  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 Al-%j- j@-  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 -T>wi J  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 xZ{|D  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 .of:#~  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 \`iW__  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 I!i#=  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 JEkIbf?=r  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 J9KLO=  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 l4BO@   
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 Hh'14n&W  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 =~2 Uv>YG  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 \ ]e w@C  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) kl{OO%jZ  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 `b'|FKc]  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 C,e$g  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) fKK-c9F   
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 tEs[zo+DR-  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 (A<sFw?  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 L|xen*O  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 3x;y}:wQa  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 @ 6VH%  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 PAWr1]DI  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 #o |&MV_j  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 QIz N# ;g  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 hZ /  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 )k%drdY{J'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 .)pRB7O3  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 Hn]n]wsLy  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 kG7,1teMk  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Y`_X@Q  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 :8!3*C-=  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 GbrPtu2{@V  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 zxmI/]3+/  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 PC(iqL8r  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 87E3pe  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 `h{mj|~  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 $Aoqtz d\  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 1^"aR#  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ydFhw}1>  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 Y>!W&Gtu  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 e8uIh[+ 0  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 GBOmVQ $Hb  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 .p*D[o2 9  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 $=QO_t)?  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 &Or=_5Y`  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 *SG2k .$  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 !U~#H_  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 L<>NL$CrN  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 Gy7x?  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 t }C ^E  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 yNf=Kl  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 teNQUIe-  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 \kGtYkctZ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Hh=::Bi  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes EKJ4_kkjM  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 yzzre>F  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 8GRr f2  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes W ]MJ!4  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 '# 2J?f'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 v5ddb)  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes gbv[*R{<%  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 naCI55Wx  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 {%~ Ec4r  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 ;mKU>F<V  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 x9 L\"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ?(UXK hs  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 T eTOj|  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 _q}%!#4  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 $ttr_4=  
    \@" . GM%  
    Worst offenders: eZkz 1j~  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change -2Cf)>`v  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 o5@P>\ u>  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 \I{A33i2w  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 6Tmb@<I_  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 6]49kHgMhe  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 RWcQT`  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ,/U 9v~  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 8=AKOOU7>  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 u)]sJ1p  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 [zd-=.:+M[  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 3YF]o9  
    A'R sy6  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: IoX 9yGq  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 \uIC<#o"N  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 y9 ' 3vZ  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 ADUI@#vk  
    %K,,Sl_  
    Compensator Statistics: p{PYUW"?^  
    Change in back focus: 3!UP>,!  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 -^"?a]B  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 :m)?+  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 ]}c=U@D,9  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 J0plQDe  
    64s;6=  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: 9}_f\Bs  
    Number of trials: 20 )fr\ V."  
    \~1+T  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution bv];Gk*Z-  
    \./2Qc,  
      Trial       Criterion        Change 2p[3Ap  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 |mA*[?ye@  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 yln.E vJjD  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 l0 _O<  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 WR1,J0UU6  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 Lj,%pzJ  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 T ua @w+  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 l!'iLq"K(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 ~'mhC46d  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 y~ LVK8  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 ,FO|'l  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 bm?TMhC  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 AV! cCQ  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 gC 4#!P  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 x{5*%}lX8  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 .[A S  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 Ey%NqOs0#  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 ?K#$81;[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 [%Xfl7;Wh  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 rJwJ5U  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 {}e IpK,+  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 v$Z1Lh  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 h^,a 1'  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 #YdU,y=B  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 | w -W=v  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 MG>;|*$%  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 (%, '  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 Yd'ke,Je  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 " Xc=<rX  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 rK wkj)  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 IuD<lMeJ J  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 2T5ZbXc+x  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 9m4|1)  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 /.bwwj_;  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 L4%LE/t|e  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 ^lj>v}4fkW  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 i9tM]/SP  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 {wySH[V  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 uyIA]OtyN  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 jT',+   
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 va<pHSX&I@  
    db|$7]!w  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 Ns(F%zkm  
    8pk">"#s  
    Nominal     0.54403234 /FY_LM  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 8wOPpdc  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 >E3OYa?G  
    Mean        0.35770970 we3t,?`rk7  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 v3Kqs:"\  
    _nUuiB>  
    {;r5]wimb  
    Compensator Statistics: F44")fY  
    Change in back focus: !v=ha%w{  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 aoN[mV '  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 }J1#UH_E  
    Mean               :         0.161872 t)h3GM  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 qI9 BAs1~}  
    :O2N'vl47A  
    90% >       0.20977951               KMa?2cJH#  
    80% >       0.22748071               3;A AC (X  
    50% >       0.38667627               ?FyA2q!  
    20% >       0.46553746               `fXcW)  
    10% >       0.50064115                #"l=Lv  
    L`6`NYR  
    End of Run. Wp $\>  
    W;7cF8fu4  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 eo !{rs@f  
    !WN r09`  
    Zr3KzY9  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 G6FknYj  
    e8Jd*AKjb  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 {=TD^>?  
    80% >       0.22748071                 % %*t{0!H+  
    50% >       0.38667627                 h<[o;E  
    20% >       0.46553746                 Xcb\N  
    10% >       0.50064115 ,{$:Q}`  
    US-P>yF  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? "[76>\'H  
    uCx\Bt"VI  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   mhL,:UE  
    6:Ra3!V"v  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : 8wMu^3r  
    90% >       0.20977951                 u6j\@U6I  
    80% >       0.22748071                 8K=sx @l  
    50% >       0.38667627                 '#L.w6<B  
    20% >       0.46553746                 -AWL :<  
    10% >       0.50064115 LR|LP)I  
    ....... bVaydJ*  
    ;rC)*=4#  
    $# klgiL  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   &]~Vft l  
    Mode                : Sensitivities qRC-+k:  
    Sampling            : 2 +X#JCLD  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 tj7{[3~-[  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 0Rgo#`7l  
    WCJ$S\#  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? l.gt+e  
    Bg3`w__l;  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试