切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16459阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 ~/C9VR&  
    {+Zj}3o  
    [A\DuJx  
    (r*"}"ZG  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 -A1@a= q  
    ^-nL!>FYY  
    `s8*n(\h  
    C}jFR] x)  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: AcHr X=O  
    FT8<a }o  
    Analysis of Tolerances 9 t8NK{  
    T:/mk`>  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX  /dI8o  
    Title: "zE>+zRl  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 ly9tI-E  
    `@3{}  
    Units are Millimeters. d#(ffPlq  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. 3R>"X c  
    K]SsEsd  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. v]h^0WU  
    WQiIS0BJ *  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. :;Xh`br  
    {Qba`lOkq  
    Mnemonics: E%%iVFPX  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. TGDrTyI?y  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. um,G^R   
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. tNvjwgV\  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. KOhK#t>H@0  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). P(xgIMc H  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). u~8=ik n+T  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). 3D}Pa  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. :P8X?C63W]  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. B=}s7$^  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. 6c6w w"  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). W:VX^8</  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). V7<w9MM  
    A$3ll|%j  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. ]bP1gV(b-  
    w ,*#z  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. .QW@rV:T  
    {ui{Yc  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm a)S{9q}%  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 6o.Dgt/f  
    Sampling            : 2 cv5+[;(b  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 XUVBD;"f!  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 uCHM  
    }ijFvIHV  
    "_0sW3rG  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees 9\Md.>  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY B7.<A#y2  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  G){A&F  
    o&$Of  
    Sensitivity Analysis: 14`S9SL{V  
    \E1CQP-  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| .6c Bx  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change B{K_?ae!  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 ;TKsAU  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 GdM|?u&s"  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 LfvNO/:,  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 u p zBd]  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 #y8Esik  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 e7yn"kd  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 jZk dTiI  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 W0S\g#  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 O[8wF86R  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 oXQI"?^+  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 Y,m=&U  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 8&:dzS  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 t(99m=9>  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 <9[>+X  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 B A i ^t  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3  GPrq(  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 ~H4Tr[8a  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 (g>&ov(d  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 zG7y$\A  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 xUPg~c0  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ,Vy_%f  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) n){u!z)Al  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 )&[ol9+\  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /&em%/  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) U9XOs)^  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 &23{(]eO  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 +.a->SZ5"  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 ?'si ^N  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 be]Zx`)k  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 M1eM^m8U  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 gMPvzBpP  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 ynn>d  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 z J V>;  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 )%q )!x  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 [M?&JA_$}  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 nu X`>Oy  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 |H%,>r`9S  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 \/!jGy*  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ?:7.3{|Aq  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 d&X <&)a7  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 t?FPmbj v  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #Wt1Ph_;  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 eK/rs r  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 v"sN K  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 U3pMv|b  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 |iVw7M:  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 V0*9Tnc  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 `8D'r|=`Eh  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 3JZ9 G79H  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Zzv,p  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 R}$A>)%dx  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 CMfR&G,)  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 S^)xioKsJ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #Qd"d3QG  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 e9eBD   
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 b|U3\Fmc  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 \P9HAz'6  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 Ns-3\~QSi  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 #rx@ 2zi  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ?r R, h{~  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 !%'c$U2  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 IJ6&*t wT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 E>rWm_G  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes $,jynRk7q  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 .*L_*}tno  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 W4=<hB  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes yV5AVM o  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 Cc` )P>L  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 xcN >L  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes @W!cC#u  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 mTZgvPJ!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 z.*=3   
    Index tolerance on surface 1 yQ+C}8r5  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 ~'/_q4  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 !Baq4V?KN  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 ?)XPY<  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 si|b>R&Z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 .8Gmy07  
    m>-(c=3  
    Worst offenders: N,u~ZEI  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change &;oWmmvz{  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 0V?:5r<  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 H3jb{S b  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ch]Q%M  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 =]F15:%Z q  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 T\o!^|8  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 qEB]Tj e[  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 .{LJ  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 {;ur~KE  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 ( O/+.qb  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 D[R<H((  
    UZqk2D  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: @|J+ f5O  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 ue#Y h  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 a |+q:g0M  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 r2 o-/$  
    GHo=)NTjy  
    Compensator Statistics: `)s>},8W!  
    Change in back focus: =H2.1 :'  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 IBr|A  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 =o+))R4  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 \%N | X  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 3re|=_ Hy  
    5\$8"/H  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: o%\pI%  
    Number of trials: 20 hh>mX6A  
    kKR Z79"7s  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution -g]g  
    M/mUY  
      Trial       Criterion        Change VwV`tKit  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 GS4 HYF  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 = A;B-_c  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 QBiLH]qa  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 , *A',  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 ONw;NaE,  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 {JlW1;Jc7  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 Y l1sAf/  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 )R`w{V  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 *PjW,   
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 kM T73OI>_  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 $!_]mz6*  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 30v 3C7o=  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 -5 YvtL  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 T7{Z0-  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 `Vqp o/  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 Y|iJO>_Uu=  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 GKNH{|B$D  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 |Skk1 #  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 a}+7MEUmZ/  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 R1DXi  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 Xbb('MoI63  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 PDnwaK   
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 }#/,nJm'  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 1MCHwX3/  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 !`G7X  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 .V?i3  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 \e/'d~F  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 IP`;hC  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 + fQ=G/  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 u8Au `  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 b1}P3W  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 a N|MBX;  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 pA*cF!tq 7  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 8h#/b1\  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 O&!tW^ih  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 z Lw=*  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 Ny>tJ~I  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 f-?00*T  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 =yf LqU  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 b0 CtQe  
    UpgY}pf}  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 MEQ :[;1  
    #KonVM(`  
    Nominal     0.54403234 DdTTWp/  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 hN6j5.x%  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 {@u;F2?  
    Mean        0.35770970 eyZ /%4'q  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 #L{QnV.3  
    `":ch9rK  
    /! kKL$j  
    Compensator Statistics: d FF[2  
    Change in back focus: h'x|yy]@3  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 P+sxlf:0  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 J3fcnI  
    Mean               :         0.161872 5A:mu+Iz6H  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 Kc*h@#`~oL  
    ;/W;M> ^  
    90% >       0.20977951               }Lx?RU+@=  
    80% >       0.22748071               M`ETH8Su=  
    50% >       0.38667627               ~O~c^fLH(B  
    20% >       0.46553746               2B7X~t>8a  
    10% >       0.50064115                ]k%Yz@*S  
    _yyQ^M/  
    End of Run. 2;G^>BP<  
    nJ#uz:(w,  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 VpJ/M(UD-  
    [0D( PV(n  
    NamBJ\2E1[  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 I=wP"(2  
    DD\:glo  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 U[=VW0  
    80% >       0.22748071                 Fd-PjW/E8  
    50% >       0.38667627                 - *!R  
    20% >       0.46553746                 j`A%(()d  
    10% >       0.50064115 _6&x$ *O  
    [k.|iCD  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? &,2h=H,M  
    ps"DL4*  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   >tnQuFKg]  
    CN@bJo2  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : fVx<f.xuW  
    90% >       0.20977951                 :UM>`Y  
    80% >       0.22748071                 ste0:.*qb  
    50% >       0.38667627                 /MYl:>e>  
    20% >       0.46553746                 [E<NEl *  
    10% >       0.50064115 ZN#mu]jC?  
    ....... Wsya:9|  
    VA + ?xk  
    F \6-s`(  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   D*.U?  
    Mode                : Sensitivities `&y Qtj# '  
    Sampling            : 2 K",YAfJa  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 "IQ' (^-P  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 UW%zR5q  
    ZLm?8g6-  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? jlaU3qXL  
    *iLlBE  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试