切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16381阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    在线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 x6=tS  
    Yc(lY N  
    D[Ld=e8t  
    `R$bx 64  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 wp-3U}P2(  
    6(HJYa  
    $5>x)jr:w+  
    \z2d=E  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: <5sfII  
    'FN3r  
    Analysis of Tolerances +Pn`AV1  
    `"bp -/  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX q?&JS  
    Title:  q0\$wI  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 Gv\fF;,R  
    ]6HnK%  
    Units are Millimeters. 2Xfy?U  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. aII:Pzh]B  
    Y[fbmn^  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. @{880 5Dp  
    It^_?oiK  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. V0:db  
    c<qJs-C4;  
    Mnemonics: c-a;nAR  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. G@S'_  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. w;^7FuBaC  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. niM(0p  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. H Sk}09GV  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). C6b(\#g(  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). fP1fm  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). 9M-/{D^+<  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. _n< @Jk~  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. rHgrC MW  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. gH/k}M7tA#  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). UIw6~a3E  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). , Onu%  
    V{kgDpB  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. rYr.mX  
    *|:]("i  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. = G3A}  
    p&;,$KDA  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm ' 9  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 90)rOD1B  
    Sampling            : 2 &]/.=J  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 H=9\B}  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 aw/5#(1R  
    J)Td'iT(  
    V?cUQghHg  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees jl4rEzVu  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY R0mWVgoz  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 u@zBE? g  
    >pA9'KWs]  
    Sensitivity Analysis: sQe>LNp,G  
    S-+^L|  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| cb~m==G  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change ;rH@>VrR  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 Ss7XjWP.}  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 wD&b[i  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 .{W)E  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 -vC?bumR%  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 W1J7$   
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 [t`QV2um  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 2]*2b{gF,  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 {%b-~& F9  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 hY Nb9^  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 g@lAk%V4  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 ];go?.*C  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Ws`P(WHm  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 z<mU$<  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 C,D~2G  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 w~g)Dz2G  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3  `#lNur\x  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 4<&`\<jZ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 : LI*#~'Ka  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 vH#^|u  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 L1k_AC1.M  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 NUH#  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) p`JD8c  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 OsR4oT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 lH^[b[  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) gI^*O@Q4{b  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 o3l_&?^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 U.G**v  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 !}^ {W)h[  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 ]f q.r  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 .Eg>)  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 LdAfY0  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 v7/qJ9l  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 `:A`%Fg8<  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 !285=cxz  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 yg gQ4y6  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 X] &Q^  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 i9oi}$;J  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 [x 5T7=  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 1G+42>?<1  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 ,m:YZ;J(Xd  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 D EL#MD!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 xS`>[8?3<T  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 ]`&ws  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 TCFx+*fBd  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 =x~HcsJ8!R  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2  `' 5(4j  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 y!Q&;xO+!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ,\f!e#d  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 n8[ sl]L  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 #|34(ML  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ~fE@]~f>  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 <ok/2v  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 =$IjN v(?  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 hof:+aW  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 'tp1|n/1  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 ]w(i,iJ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 2hl'mRW  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 Uax- z  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 41WnKz9c  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 -1~bWRYq  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 iU\WV  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 9Bl_t}0  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 l-"$a8jn2  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes p UWj,&t  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 7%9Sz5z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 w9h\J#f  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes w3c[t~R8  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 /z*?:*  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #z)@T  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes E/9 U0  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 hV/$6 8A_  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 2;NIUMAMM  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 =usx' #rb  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 6';'pHqe  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 qIa|sV\w0  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 wGE:U`  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 b/ h,qv  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 ;GO>#yg4Eh  
    -82Rz   
    Worst offenders: e;R5A6|  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change yw2^kk93|  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ._"U{ f2V  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 TGGeTtk=  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 V4}9f5FR  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 l njaHol0  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 b;O]@kBB  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 qCn(~:  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Zg%U4m:  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Sve~-aG  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 PmO utYV  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 %p)6m 2Sb  
    xxgS!J  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: /pZLt)=P  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 g= k}6"F~  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 2c@R!*  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 abUvU26t  
    1 e1$x@\\  
    Compensator Statistics: ={-\)j  
    Change in back focus: z _~f/  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 8MGtJ'.  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 ?N<* ATC L  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 Ey=(B'A~  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 *<#jr  
    ! R?r)G5E  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: o-Pa3L=  
    Number of trials: 20 h S}?"ST|  
    UP}Y s*  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution sH(4.36+  
    LX'.up11X5  
      Trial       Criterion        Change A9ia[2[  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 %*lOzC  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 ilEWxr;,  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 =0TnH<`  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 R:P'QM   
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 QpwOrxI}  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 U0q{8 "Pl  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 t6BggO"_u  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 '{p/F $  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 #ok1qT9_  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 M5s>;q)  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 Uc%(#I]Mi  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 > $DMVtE0  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 'Ar+k\.J  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 (wU<Kpt?J  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 n]?Yv E  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 G < Z)y#  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 y{+$B Y$_  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 M?Tb9c?`  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 W\:!v%C  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 MWl?pG!Y  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 #'fh'$5"  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 VliX'.-  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 R7}=k)U?d@  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 Yb\t0:_  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 oa$-o/DhB  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 5A oKlJrY  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 O*xC}$OOn  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 B:#5U85m  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 ~A2{$C  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 !|;^  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 V TQ V]>|  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 ~=91Kxf  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 6&_"dg"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 v7&oHOk!  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 ".A+'pJ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 L)W1bW}  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 'QW/TJ=7r  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 k=1([x  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 5S`_q&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 6t/nM  
    ~XGBE  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 =lY6v -MBw  
    e^2e[rp0  
    Nominal     0.54403234 V}gP'f07zy  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 n "?It  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 )rcFBD{vM  
    Mean        0.35770970 6/_] |4t  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 ATx6YP@7~  
    %;ZWYj`]n  
    4g<F."  
    Compensator Statistics: vU,AOK[l{  
    Change in back focus: !wP |t#Sc9  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 &N4Jpa}w/%  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 !lxs1!:  
    Mean               :         0.161872 ML@-@BaN  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 ,{DZvif   
    aDEz |>q  
    90% >       0.20977951               z\64Qpfm  
    80% >       0.22748071               -7jP'l=h  
    50% >       0.38667627               Z3jh-{0  
    20% >       0.46553746               /){F0Zjjt  
    10% >       0.50064115                HQPb  
    4#hDt^N~  
    End of Run. 4Uz1~AuNxb  
    :lf;C T6$  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 }#0MJ6L  
    O`Ht|@[6  
    nADt8  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 [4qCW{x._  
    ">pW:apl%  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 7lP3\7wD@9  
    80% >       0.22748071                 NF?FEUoxz  
    50% >       0.38667627                 }h+_kRQ  
    20% >       0.46553746                 eFO+@  
    10% >       0.50064115 qg7] YT&  
    i&cH  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? {HgW9N(  
    |. bp  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   G5^gwG+  
    Y~RZf /`  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : <.3@-z>w2,  
    90% >       0.20977951                 gB 3&AQ  
    80% >       0.22748071                 ?Di, '  
    50% >       0.38667627                 81a&99k#  
    20% >       0.46553746                 Y=G *[G#  
    10% >       0.50064115 /2u;w !oi.  
    ....... m@JU).NKCS  
    o*n""m  
    +!POKr  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   !W$3p'8Tu  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 5d}PrYa  
    Sampling            : 2 E08AZOY&g  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 dab>@z4  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 3:Co K#  
    w]yLdfi!  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? f| N(~  
    c<&+[{|  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试