切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 15929阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 X]MM7hMuR  
    `AHNk7 t=  
    k`mrRs  
    B9)qv>m  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 ku9F N  
    ((>3,%B`  
    ,tF" 4|#  
    SA 4je9H%  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: }_:#fE  
    MQH8Q$5D  
    Analysis of Tolerances Y_3YO 2K]  
    5uJP) S?  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX k>;r9^D  
    Title: n[:AV  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 k=~pA iRDN  
    D3AtYt  
    Units are Millimeters. T{{AZV"pB  
    All changes are computed using linear differences.  ~uZLe\>K  
    K<  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. @1-GPmj-  
    `{Di*  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. K^& ]xFW  
    2td|8vDA  
    Mnemonics: ="w8U'  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. VmH_0IM^6  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. 2N8sq(LK{  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. K6yFpVl  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. Ta\8 >\6  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). RQ)!KlY  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). 2\CkX  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). nP{sCH 1  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. I;.! hV>E  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. A"<)(M+kG  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. vl{_M*w ;  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). z'} =A  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). nK%/tdq  
    ];{l$-$$  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. Or#+E2%1E  
    i_'R"ob{S  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. L1!hF3G  
    'UXj\vJ3E  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm Q~Sv2  
    Mode                : Sensitivities =.f +}y  
    Sampling            : 2 W/ZahPPq  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 >[%.h(h/%  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 )4F/T,{;m  
    0O['-x  
    qfP"UAc{/  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees d,J<SG&L&  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY $7gB&T.x  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 zEPx  
    bHQKRV  
    Sensitivity Analysis: HSr"M.k5  
    l;{N/cS  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| p`<e~[]a  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change sg6w7fp>  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 <E7Vbb9*  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 mp+\!  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 K,C $J I  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 qp~4KukL  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 g"dZB2`C  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 1l|A[ G  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 AR+\uD=\I-  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 <GT>s  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 .iP G/e  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 N9JgV,`  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 */5<L99v  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ofPF}  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 X\3 ,NR,  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 kTi PZZI  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 X~)V)'R  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 v1"g!%U6  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 )(?UA$"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 32bkouq  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 O2'bNR  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 ll<9f)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 `3sy>GU?  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) B=Zukg1G  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 L`HH);Ozw  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ZXsY-5$#d-  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) WDoKbTv  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 |?fW!y  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 V$Xl^#tN  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 &` 00/p  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 {sna)v$;  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 m_E[bDON  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 6L:tr LuQ  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 :uIi ?  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 L&DF,fWsF&  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 fZw9zqg  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 94p:|5@  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 =;k+g?.@I  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 ^ =/?<C4  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 {#w A !>.  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Rekb?|{z  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 ;Oi[:Ck  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 [yYH>~SuwZ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 C`yvBt40r  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 _[$T29:8\]  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 c9*1$~(v0I  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 wZo.ynXT  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 {;Y 89&*R  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ^8';8+$  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Bg 7j5  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 $TD~k;   
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 `FzYvd"N  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 RVgPH<1X@e  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 I9[1U   
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 68koQgI[^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 c|\ZRBdI  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 J0ZxhxX35  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 N"Qg\PS_  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 gnQo1q{ 4  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 eq@am(#&kY  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 ;t;Y.*&=S  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 @)W(q5)}9"  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 =9qGEkd3  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 z.2r@Psk  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 |+Hp+9J  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes :mXGIRi  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 _KB{J7bs<a  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 "*++55  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes T~i%j@Q.6  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 W>5vRwx00  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 AW,v  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes [%j?.N  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 |^7f\.oF  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 mF[o*N*  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 ^[{`q9A#d  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 a|DsHZ^6^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 g$*/ XSr(  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 jOUK]>ox:  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 ./'~];&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 ==QWwPpA  
    [[R7~.;  
    Worst offenders: ?S (im  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change 7d&DrI@~  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Ds%9cp*6  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ;{<aA 5  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 tigT@!`$Y  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Nls83 W  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 :J^qjAV  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Bk?8 zYp  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 wP[xmO-%  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 2v0!` &?M{  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 z]^+^c_  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 Z[",$Lt  
    8F#osN  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: +c^_^Z$_4o  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 K(<$.  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 !ZFr7Xz  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 >Bc> IO  
    Og,Y)a;=  
    Compensator Statistics: t#C,VwMe[  
    Change in back focus: \|CPR6I  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 b2N6L2~V  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 \+-zRR0  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 rwiw Rh  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 Vclr)}5  
    ~12_D'8D[  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: S_J,[#&  
    Number of trials: 20 t/}L36@+  
    !; IJ   
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution U^MuZ  
    u*2fP]n  
      Trial       Criterion        Change ^YGTh0$W  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 M\Se_  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 ;HDZ+B  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 3gAR4  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 \V,c]I   
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 U4BqO :sd  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 \K;op2  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 8".2)W4*  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 cJCU*(7&  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 B`fH^N  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 o\Uu?.-<  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 jpRBER_X  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 GcT;e5D  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 F/>*If s  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 lwc5S `"  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 J! {Al  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 ow$q7uf  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 \R(R9cry  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 *m9{V8Yi2  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 En(7(qP6}  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 g+xw$A ou  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 .wmnnvtl,  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 K/txD20 O|  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 [$pmPr2  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 ciudRK63M  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 4:7mK/Z  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 gY(1,+0-  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 R_^/,^1  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 {CtR+4KD  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907  4*TmlY  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 iib  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 (luKn&826  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 zvY+R\,in  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353  W^Y#pn  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 "X04mQn15  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 .Pe9_ZH$W  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 i^)WPP>4Aw  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 EF#QH _X  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 y7: tr  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 [84F0 9HU  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 Iy';x  
    ?P/AC$:|I  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 +H_MV=A^  
    `S3>3  
    Nominal     0.54403234 im]g(#GnKh  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 JN4fPGbV  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 ~=En +J}*  
    Mean        0.35770970 9M a0^_  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 O/Rhf[7v*  
    ujr(K=E  
    tnz+bX26  
    Compensator Statistics: h1[WhBL-O  
    Change in back focus: =WG=C1Z  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 c>HK9z{  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 fY,|o3#  
    Mean               :         0.161872 x[(?#  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 geM6G$V&  
     fvEAIs  
    90% >       0.20977951               ;apzAF  
    80% >       0.22748071               CSTI?A"P  
    50% >       0.38667627               9zBMlc$X  
    20% >       0.46553746               wW2d\Zd&  
    10% >       0.50064115                *|% ^0#$c  
    VsK>6S\T  
    End of Run. uH@FU60  
    WG7k(Sp ]  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 XL$* _c <)  
    V Z y4_v=  
    m ee$"Y  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 l@JSK ;  
    &fOdlQ?  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 }R[#?ty;]  
    80% >       0.22748071                 WEg6Kz  
    50% >       0.38667627                 3.d"rl  
    20% >       0.46553746                 }9HmTr|  
    10% >       0.50064115 kum#^^4G|  
    'ly?P8h  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? vbx6I>\Y  
    7?8wyk|x  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   9^"b*&>P  
    :2 >hoAJJ  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : ThPE 0V  
    90% >       0.20977951                 < >UPD02  
    80% >       0.22748071                 8/)qTUx:  
    50% >       0.38667627                 ;8!Z5H  
    20% >       0.46553746                 eh,~^x5  
    10% >       0.50064115 0]D0{6x8  
    ....... G:x*BH+  
    qV5DW0.  
    *'Z B*>  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   s=?g\oR  
    Mode                : Sensitivities `jS T  
    Sampling            : 2 r>bJ%M}  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 6_N(;6kx(  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 G,;,D9jO7  
    jqr1V_3(  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? Ts~L:3oaQ  
    > x IJE2  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试