切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 15224阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 J 48$l(l3  
    6 A#xFPYY{  
    V=1zk-XC  
    4qsxlN>4O  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 b<"jmB{  
    ,jw`9a  
    : vgn0 IQ  
    LH`2Y,E  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: BxQ,T@  
    zA3r&stN+  
    Analysis of Tolerances 2:nI4S  
    l2dj GZk  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX L?&&4%%  
    Title: FDGG$z?>m  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 `GCK%evLG  
    ),j6tq[  
    Units are Millimeters. S0r+Y0J]<  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. &_hEM~{  
    Iu >4+6  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. @qx$b~%  
    ^L7!lzyo  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. $}z/BV1I  
    j*4:4B%  
    Mnemonics: ssoE,6kS  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. BB(v,W  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. u$(ei2f  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. .P?n<n#  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. Vx> Q  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). Yw5-:w0f  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). _p'@.P  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). ,\aL v  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. EIyFGCw|U  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. IA]wO%c  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. u7Ix7`V  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). U0{)goN.  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). _VmXs&4  
    kp}[nehF  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. 6PS[OB{3  
    `8Ych@f]  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. i ?uX'apk  
    !"Q%I#8uh  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm "Jg.)1Jw  
    Mode                : Sensitivities >7~*j4g  
    Sampling            : 2 -/0\_zq7  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 5;^1Ab0  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 84WcaH  
    I.T?A9Z  
    8e,F{>N  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees S_OtY]gF  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY 2/uZ2N |S  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 0chpC)#Q3;  
    ' ]+!i a  
    Sensitivity Analysis: $e--"@[Y  
    gTOx|bx  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| ju "?b2f  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change bM:4i1Z  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 ^,AE;Z T7  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 6-TYOUm  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 bu_@A^ys  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 {f)aFGp  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 n8_X<jIp3  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 &ZkJ,-  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 oq!\100  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 h-;> v.  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 &|ne!wu  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 g'7\WQ  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 sCzpNJ"8  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 N0kCdJv  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 rOt{bh6r  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 r,0D I  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 vfv?QjR  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3  ] ?D$n  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 /}>8|#U3y  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Ao`e{  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 fx(8 o+  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 ]w;t0Bk  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 m[2[9 bQ0  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) U2<q dknB  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 [qRww]g;P|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ^ [HUtq  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) *qSvSY*  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 ojf6@p_  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 KO#kIM-  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 pqpsa'  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 Ezew@*(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 UsU Ri  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 KNQj U-A  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 t855|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Ay qs~&{  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 2INpo  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 F#<:ZByjJ@  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ]] 0M  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 TK' 5NM+4  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 I F!xZ6X8  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 44P [P{y  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 Vfy@?x= &  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 z$%8'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 @"fv[=Xb  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 MDIPoS3BRa  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 t-C|x)J+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 U ^O4HJ  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 ZR3,dW6S  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 `{Oqb  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 2@Nd02v|  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 <$A/ ('  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 JP\jhkn  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 zB+e;x f|  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 [Fag\/Y+  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 o!+'< IQ'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 RF2I_4  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 [W$Mn.5<s  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 7)#JrpTj%  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Kzq^f=p  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 9 $X" D  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 o?M;f\Fy  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 R7z @y o  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 K9&Q@3V  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 R'B_YKHBY  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 &_;=]t s  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes Wy6a4oY  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 o(54 A['  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 It/'R-H  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes dly -mPmP  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 {y@8E>y5$  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 zD8$DG8  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes 6A>bm{`c:  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 o%lxEd r  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _f>)G3p  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 p_n$}z  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 nZNS}|6  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 NhYUSk ~u  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 Fpn'0&~-fi  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 ]1GyEr:  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 A -8]4p::  
    zU0JwZi  
    Worst offenders: OOnj(%g  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change WyQ8}]1b  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Ei<+{P(t0  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 $OGMw+$C ^  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 %Y|AXx R  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Pq-@waH3  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ojj T  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 3|3ad'  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 wc}x [cS  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 xTcY&   
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 ">fRM=fl  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 oc-o>H  
    Xpkj44cd@  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: )kKeA  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 4l/~::y  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 ^:O*Sx.CA  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 ( Y mIui>  
    +}-cvM/*  
    Compensator Statistics: 8L@@UUjr  
    Change in back focus: N=8CVI  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 lrMkp@ f.  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 *9r 32]i;  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 q| *nd!y'  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 p1ER<_fp  
    "MOmJYH  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: K~8!Gh{h]  
    Number of trials: 20 pl 1CEoe  
    ,#.^2O9-^  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution ljh,%#95=  
    34vH+,!u  
      Trial       Criterion        Change Sa6YqOel@  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 Ti5"a<R4m6  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 .ityudT<  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 hN1{?PQ  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 r*ry8QA  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 o6:p2W  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 B|BJkY'  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 bEzy KrN\  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 55x.Q  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 RYX=;n  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 d[KG0E5`  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 t*!Q9GC_  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 cU=EXyP%  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 q?Mmkh)g  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 Y3f2RdGl  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 a 1pa#WC  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 j&=!F3[  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 km!jxs  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 J$i5A9IUr  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 [,p[%Dza  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 'd=B{7k@  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 HA(G q  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 -*C+z!?BP  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 _n_|skG  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 "EC,#$e%ev  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 5J8U] :Y)  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 ?i7}d@636  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 +&hd3  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 %,G0)t   
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 Zo|# ,AdE>  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 x0_$,Tz@  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 .#y.:Pb|e  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081  \>*B  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 PF?tEw_WB  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 0(!D1G{ul  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 *XZlnO  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 !4B($]t  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165  &(Ot(.  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 TS{ycGY  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 w8df-]r  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 Una7O]  
    ]N+(SU  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 g~JN"ap  
    $($26g  
    Nominal     0.54403234 |i7j }i  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 9$pQ|e0tJ  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 S0 AaJty  
    Mean        0.35770970 :NJ(QkTZv  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 8e9ZgC|  
    G92Ya^`  
    IOx9".  
    Compensator Statistics: i+)9ItZr  
    Change in back focus: [h>RO55e  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 e==}qQ  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 CXr]V"X9  
    Mean               :         0.161872 WxB}Uh  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 ]D@_cxud3  
    Q,# )  
    90% >       0.20977951               t7"vAjZU  
    80% >       0.22748071               lC8DhRd0_  
    50% >       0.38667627               [J'O5" T  
    20% >       0.46553746               y my/`%  
    10% >       0.50064115                p,hDZea  
    3_:J`xX(4  
    End of Run. 'gDhi!h%  
    bT^6AtsJ  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 vR X_}`m8#  
    95 7Cr  
    K'6dlwn).  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 8CR b6  
    9ZbT41  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 .paKV"LJ  
    80% >       0.22748071                 8-s7^*!  
    50% >       0.38667627                 DG%vEM,y  
    20% >       0.46553746                 @N tiT,3k  
    10% >       0.50064115 z CS.P.$  
    hDn?R}^l{  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? ~AvB5  
    >8v4fk IK  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   3xhGmD\SKO  
    sGAOK%28  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : !a7YM4D  
    90% >       0.20977951                  (2dkmn  
    80% >       0.22748071                 /_V4gwb}|-  
    50% >       0.38667627                 'R nvQ""  
    20% >       0.46553746                 =kBWY9 :$,  
    10% >       0.50064115 RwoAZ]Zg]  
    ....... ]owcx=5q%'  
    ?#|in}  
    UW],9r/PD@  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   AxiCpAS;J  
    Mode                : Sensitivities ;s w3MRJ  
    Sampling            : 2 Ya ~lPc  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 T#=&oy7  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 V w5@)l*f  
    r&O:Bt}x  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? nuLxOd*n  
     -TKQfd  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试