切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16180阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 !e0OGf  
    :mI[fQ  
    S+LS!b  
    jkrv2 `"  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 Or2J  
    (9A`[TRwi  
    rDEd MT  
    [3~mil3rO  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: ;LhNz()b  
    #A@d;U%  
    Analysis of Tolerances ,5 ylrE  
    jW< aAd  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX q '  
    Title: tw*n+{]hi  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 1k:s~m?!  
    'y? HF@NJ  
    Units are Millimeters. -:P`Rln  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. o(|fapK.  
    Li{R?Osx  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. <:YD.zAh|  
    ZQ_&HmgRy  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. f'-) 3T  
    XVRtfo  
    Mnemonics: ;V:Cf/@@R  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. .zMM!l3  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. b~L8m4L  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. #R#o/@|  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. Sd\+f6x  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). %(v<aEQtt  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). Qk_Mx"  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). J_tI]?jrU  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. &58TX[#  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. giNyD4uO  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. &l| :1  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). !J%m7 A  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). ja Ot"iU.B  
    :{tj5P!S  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. "?Mf%u1R  
    $At,D.mGkb  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. B;6N.X(K  
    (+=TKI<=  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm 6 z2_b wo  
    Mode                : Sensitivities *]uj0@S  
    Sampling            : 2 zm9_[0  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 xy.di9  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 J ;e/S6l  
    L3 VyW8Y  
    o@!!I w  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees ,x. 2kb  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY ="Edt+a)t  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 lDd8dT-Q.  
    H{4/~Z  
    Sensitivity Analysis: cz6\qSh\,  
    "v9i;Ba>+  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| ZR|cZH1}C  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change h4 X>  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 R8K ?! Z  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374  =>Md>VM  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 rdY/QvP0=  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 zV<vwIUrr  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 ^1 P@BRh  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 s/=.a2\  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 SA'c}gP  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 61}hB>TT:  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 |x ~<Dc>0*  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 |n_es)A  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 "VfV;)]|w  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 4qc 0QA%  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 3|FZ!8D  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 k.d Q;v}  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 *z{.9z`  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 'J=knjAT  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 KW[Jft  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _H (:$=$Q  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 s,2gd'  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 B,]:<1l~  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 fsxZQ=-PW  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) w'-J24>=  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 UJX=lh.o  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 N+[ |"v  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) o3oAk10  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 t'F_1P^*/  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 1 iWe&I:  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 F|seBBu  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 5%5z@Ka  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ; {P"~(S%  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 2' 8$I}h  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 O [81nlhS0  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000  7z?r x  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 Owa]ax5  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 c_33.i"I}  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Yiq8 >|  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 G\S>H  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 {m&8Viq1  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 yM8<)6=  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 A`D^}F6  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 i7m=V T  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #O |Z\|n  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 V(Dn!Nz  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 N]k(8K  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #78P_{#!  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 9b0M'x'W5  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 \"r*wae  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 gmY*}d` 'f  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 N!`8-ap\^  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ;8G( l   
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 =>0+BD  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 .skR4f,h  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 NB z3j  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 *FwHZZ~U  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 nn"Wn2ciS  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 AxN.k  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 SnhB$DG  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 ? 8d7/KZO  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 bYKyR}e  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 iuX82z`  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 BE;J/  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 4+V+SD  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 `xhiG9mz~  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes >}43xIRRCq  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 C y b-}l  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 B~_='0Gm[  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes ::xH C4tw  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 2ja@NT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 xz+Y1fYT  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes CTbz?Kn  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 e$E~@{[1)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 T/_JXK>W  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 zKi5e+\  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 Qr/8kWa0 C  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 z_dorDF8`>  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 ">n38:?R  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 &~u=vuX  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 L29,Y=n@  
    P~)ndaQ  
    Worst offenders: pX:FXzYQ  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change OZF^w[ `w  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 +7jr]kP9  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 )TceNH  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Q}J'S5%  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 ]to"X7/  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 i4Y_5  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 0.}Um  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ,_ XDCu @  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 |EJ&s393&  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 VWlOMqL995  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 s<I[)FQVr  
    /`3^?zlu"  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: qIwI]ub~  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 jhWNMu  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 _jw A_  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 8+&] q#W3  
    ^N!l$&=  
    Compensator Statistics: g& y R-  
    Change in back focus: g<[_h(xDeG  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 p%A(5DE  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 !@ml^&hP  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 GfAt-huL(  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 Ojkbv  
    PMJe6*(x/  
    Monte Carlo Analysis:  8@)/a  
    Number of trials: 20 kU8V,5  
    ;SzOa7  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution 27-<q5q  
     H}NW?  
      Trial       Criterion        Change Mj&f7IUO  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 /;M0tP  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 R|T_9/#)  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 %C= {\]-2~  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 jfyV9)  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 D?rQQxb  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 Y8I$J BO  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 6&=xu|M<x=  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 :\Z;FA@g(g  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 h:[PO6GdX  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 D-.XSIEMu  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 b|T}mn  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 eR(PY{  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 Q)}sX6TB  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 . `lcxC  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 I"E5XVC);  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 tw8@&8"  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 tr2@{xb  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 #F5O>9hA  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 jxL5L[  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 >2 gemTy  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 Tx35~Z`0  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 [{_JO+)+n  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 QQKvy0?1  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 ZD1UMB0$4  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 fmH$ 1C<  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 @b2{'#9]}  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 8#S|j BV  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040  tFvti5  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 TL+a_]3@  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 __""!Yz  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 F;jl0)fBR=  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 XpWqL9s_E  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 {4&G\2<^^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 F]3iL^v  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 |jW82L+!N%  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 pB{QO4q n  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 JoA^9AYhR  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 5tR<aIf  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 /reSU 2  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 .:c^G[CQ^9  
    .eW}@1+[;  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 |_a E~_  
    8ON$M=Ze$  
    Nominal     0.54403234 `9eE139V='  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 wo84V!"A  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 H$Fz{[[u  
    Mean        0.35770970 aYe,5dK>  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 0X#tt`;  
    gOa'o<  
    z>NRvx0  
    Compensator Statistics: GAbX.9[V  
    Change in back focus: Os9xZ  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 zl46E~"]x  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 !l@IG C  
    Mean               :         0.161872 DqrS5!C  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 NFPW#-TF  
    O'U0Y8HN  
    90% >       0.20977951               L~Epd.,Dt  
    80% >       0.22748071               r#rQ3&Vn  
    50% >       0.38667627               Y1txI  
    20% >       0.46553746               "$PbpY  
    10% >       0.50064115                Afo(! v  
    !Pt|Hk dr  
    End of Run. ;JA2n\iP,  
    ?Jm/v%0O  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 p+#J;.  
    or\ 2)  
    Yt!UIl\<  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 S1wt>}w0$  
    /s uz>o\  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                  :D} xT]  
    80% >       0.22748071                  nsij;C  
    50% >       0.38667627                 ;$&&tEh)  
    20% >       0.46553746                 Yq4_ss'nB  
    10% >       0.50064115 M' "S:  
    tx}{E<\>$  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? lLxKC7b  
    .Gh-T{\V'  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   $T tCVR  
    fOm=#:O  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : |F-_YR  
    90% >       0.20977951                 ZtlF]k:MV  
    80% >       0.22748071                 Q[;!z1ur  
    50% >       0.38667627                 o )GNV  
    20% >       0.46553746                 oil s;*q  
    10% >       0.50064115 X<Rh-1$8F  
    ....... UtIwrR[  
    282 m^ 2  
    Dp8YzWL2^  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   KV k 36;$  
    Mode                : Sensitivities /0s1q  
    Sampling            : 2 kG[u$[B  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 9w[7X"#n  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 AFGWlC#`  
    BB-E"<  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? d&&^_0O  
    i64a]=  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试