切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16204阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 F\KjEl0  
    c;Pe/d  
    "s0)rqf<  
    (l^3Z3zf&  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 49GkPy#]L=  
    Br1&8L-|%  
    5:Z0Pt  
    47+&L   
    然后运行分析的结果如下: + B B@OW  
    lr>oYS0  
    Analysis of Tolerances BJ$9v bhZN  
    dCi?SIN  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX I,>- tGK  
    Title: 6Ypc`  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 8 OY3A  
    *|%@6I(  
    Units are Millimeters. ORe(]I`Z  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. 52:HNA\E/  
    A9I{2qW9+Z  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. ^1iSn)&  
    $HHs^tW  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. DFZkh^PFd  
    {XR6>]  
    Mnemonics: qE&v ;  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. y"bByd|6  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. >`Y.+4 mE  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. C7lH]`W|/  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. <"{qk2LS1  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). K1mPr^3rC  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). ]R h#g5X  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). gw#5jW\  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. Cn'(<bl  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. Xe6w|  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. mHV%I@`Y6  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). R "n 5  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). l~c@^!  
    {@6= Q 6L  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. :o0JY= 5  
    2`7==?  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. 5]KW^sL  
    diJLZikk  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm H$=e -L`@  
    Mode                : Sensitivities d4u})  
    Sampling            : 2 e- :yb^  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 u$DHVRrF<  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 zL$@`Eh-KP  
    D^yRaP*|7  
    nygbt<;?  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees {P*pk c  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY <;vbsksZeH  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 /1"(cQ%?  
    'Y*E<6:  
    Sensitivity Analysis: @Z*W  
    Bp_$.!Qy  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| ^T*?>%`  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change /(u}KMR!f  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 `IP/d  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 'FqQzx"r  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 i!J8 d"  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 rf $QxJ  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 5:pM 4J  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /xsF90c\h  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 "S8uoSF`>  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 2)G %)'  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 S?>HD|Z  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 'Q|M'5'  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 s3~lT.  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #*QO3y~ZM  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 (KFCs^x7wG  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 gRCdY8GH  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 *^g:P^4  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 4lr(,nPRD  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 l n{e1':$"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 4]yOF_8h  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 J2::'Hw*s  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 SQ44  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 wP6 Fl L  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) A0o-:n Fu  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 !Fca~31R'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 '10oK {m$  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) s8ywKTR-  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 iL7DRQ1  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 n!NS(. o  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 K?[q% W]%  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 kO,zZF&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 J#w J4!  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 /RNIIY~w  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 U}6B*Xx'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 zDw5]*R  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 v'U{/ ,x  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 S0B|#O%Z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 \SN&G `o<  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 ruc++@ J@  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 GNgKo]u  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 R@/"B8H  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 [h^2Y&Au5  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 OjFLPGRCh  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 8D>n1b(H  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 !B\R''J5  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 R%{ a1r>9h  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 v9:9E|,U+  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 ?\vh9  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 {{B%f.   
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 P#R R9>Q  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 Ka[t75~;  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 SW*"\X;  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 OHeT,@(mh  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 E8pB;\Z(  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 MXw hxk#E  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 v{(^1cX  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 *G{^|z  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 ~tBYIkvWT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /LvRP yj@  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 pk^K:Xs}  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 o$#G0}yn  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 +wEac g>>E  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 +?:7O=Y  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 P+s !|7'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 uW30ep'  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes 7[> 6i  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 t/cY=Wp  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 U&Wt%U{  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes AfX}y+Ah  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 jF0jkj1&/[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 i(AT8Bo2  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes L\@I*QP  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 eM$sv9?  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 + Af"f' )  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 z2g3FUTX)b  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 eO?p*"p"F  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 U^Q:Y}^  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 o=50>$5jlS  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 # WAZ9,t  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 XZ sz/#  
    vgsJeV`}I  
    Worst offenders: hEBY8=gK  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change JT-J#Ag  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Kla'lCZ  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324  f4Xk,1Is  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 4kBaB  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 te3}d'9&|  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 4)@mSSfn.  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Q4+gAS9  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 iPd[l {85Z  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 7J EbH?lEN  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 -=~| ."O  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 n/SwP  
    _a6[{_Pc  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: Z Uox Mm  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 1guJG_;z  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 BI3@|,._N  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 bYEy<7)x  
    H5Z$*4%G  
    Compensator Statistics: [H6hyG~  
    Change in back focus: v6>_ j L  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 L3@82yPo!  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 FFu9&8Y  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 j@SQ~AS  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 +y&Tf#.V/A  
    n 2)@S0{  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: gj*+\3KO@a  
    Number of trials: 20 E`?3PA8  
    .^h#_[dp  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution f33l$pOp  
    }+C2I  
      Trial       Criterion        Change 9%B\/&f  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 >'&p>Ad)  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 ]Q>.HH  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 uTKD 4yig  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 hw= Ft4L  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 2zs73:z  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 P_*" dza  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 BT}!W`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 >pp5;h8!  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 j$?{\iXZ  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 7f0lQ  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 DXJ`oh  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 Y8-86 *zC  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 ;\14b?TUH  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 FVaQEMZ^  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 J&.{7YF  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 5h Q E4/hH  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 -o $QS,  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 M$/|)U'W  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 u>kN1kQ8  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 56zL"TF`  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 ;/r1}tl+3>  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 $5ak_@AC  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 MP_ ~<Q  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 HY&aV2|A1  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 __|+w<]  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 i} .&0Fp  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 y5 *Z 3"<  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040  SL#0kc0x  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 &#!4XOyB  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 = kJ,%\E`  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 60J;sGW  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 18+)`M-5o  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 `(_s|-$  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 E\as@pqo\p  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 WtG~('g>&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 "4ri SxEyF  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 }o(zj=7  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 Ju96#v+:  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 /s@oZ{h  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 VUPXO  
    RS)tO0  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 {2=jAz'?  
    G6/p1xy>o:  
    Nominal     0.54403234 {`LU+  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 n `&/ D  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 .1KhBgy^K  
    Mean        0.35770970 [d(U38BI  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 8Kg n"M3  
    ADDSCY=,  
    r'^Hg/Jzt  
    Compensator Statistics: }1Gv)l7  
    Change in back focus: Z>)Bp /-  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 jQ2Ot<  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 e1%/26\  
    Mean               :         0.161872 /Z~<CbKKl  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 UTH*bL5/J2  
    F`gi_; c  
    90% >       0.20977951               x3 q]I8q  
    80% >       0.22748071               H*ow\ Ct  
    50% >       0.38667627               "D63I|O)  
    20% >       0.46553746               ]s'Q_wh_-v  
    10% >       0.50064115                L ^q""[  
    q U%/W|LY  
    End of Run. 7gj4j^a^]{  
    *5%d XixN  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 ABQ('#78  
    `o=q%$f#k~  
    7 n8"/0kc:  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 b\yXbyjZ3.  
    >, F bX8Zz  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 $ `ov4W  
    80% >       0.22748071                 Bmr>n6|  
    50% >       0.38667627                 xN5)   
    20% >       0.46553746                 *=8JIs A>!  
    10% >       0.50064115 ff]6aR/ UQ  
    BF\XEm?!  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? Z InpMp  
    K'L^;z6  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   &5\iM^  
    PQy4{0 _  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : 0g +7uGp:  
    90% >       0.20977951                 AS!?q  
    80% >       0.22748071                 &b.=M>\9Q  
    50% >       0.38667627                 cA2V2S)  
    20% >       0.46553746                 n D0K).=Q  
    10% >       0.50064115 ?8I?'\F;  
    ....... fFMlDg[];  
    6w*dKInG[-  
    N,`$M.|?  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   b[sx_b  
    Mode                : Sensitivities Bgn&:T8<  
    Sampling            : 2 &x=.$76  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 v6[!o<@"a  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 8{|8G-Mi  
    0QB iC]9  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? 3RiWZN  
    heltgRt  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试