切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16191阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 *pYawT  
    "9#hk3*GqX  
    `Ip``I#A  
    Fu>;hx]s  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 T}jW,Ost  
    )S9}uOG#  
    TPA*z9n+B  
    5^N y6t  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: * >k6n5%  
    Zm vtUma  
    Analysis of Tolerances &],O\TAul  
    -XfGF<}r  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX pQoZDD@B$  
    Title: c1xX)cF  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 (_R!:H(]m  
    ? CU;  
    Units are Millimeters. -Dwe,N"{2  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. sWKv> bx  
    z+c'-!e/  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. ~xJ ^YkyH  
    _^D-nk?  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. 7#j9"*  
    ddY-F }z~  
    Mnemonics: g,B@*2Uj  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. *G[` T%g  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. xLP8*lvy  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x.  USJ4Z  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. X([@}ren  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). b?/Su<q  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). S`& yVzv  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). CdKs+x&tZ  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. PHMp, z8  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. _TyQC1 d  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. v}<z_i5/C.  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). i "aQm  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). .*?)L3n+t  
    Lr Kx  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. 4'.] -u  
    jX,A.  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. MfraTUxIo/  
    Uv(}x 7e)  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm GuF-HP}xM  
    Mode                : Sensitivities b/4gs62{k  
    Sampling            : 2 bd3>IWihp  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 `FK qVd  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 D=)qd@,K  
    qc3?Aplj  
    I#xhmsF  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees *7qa]i^]  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY _k5$.f:Yj<  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 xOZvQ\%  
    7o-}86x#  
    Sensitivity Analysis: wKJK!P  
    ]0pI6"  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| (A;HB@)[A  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change 6wb M$|yFj  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 }dSFv   
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 {XW>3 "  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 0.#% KfQ  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 ,88%eX|  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 7>gW2 m  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 >P6U0  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 SNV;s,  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 ve4 QS P  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 !)c0  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 R~bLEo  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 (; Zl  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 2Mu(GUe;  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 U27ja|W^  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 |h:3BV_  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 =OR&,xt  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 l> >BeZ  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 &jDRRT3  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 1'5 !")r  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 JM*rPzp  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 'eoI~*}3WQ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 h#8 {fr)6  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) tI2p-d9B  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 sk. rJ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 VE/~tT;  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) Bc#6mO-  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 T f^O(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 YGLR%PYv"  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 4W+nS v  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 y)Lyo'`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /h@rLJ)o>  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 Rh7=,=u  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 ;<`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 N?Ss/by8Sg  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 i4 tW8 Il  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 X .S8vlb4z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 n]btazM{  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 Fw;Y)y=O  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 QLTE`t5w3'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 W&^2Fb  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 yDw^xGws  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 L G9#D  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 II_MY#0X  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 Xgm9>/y  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 o6;VrpaNi  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 &nZ.$UK<  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 )^'wcBod,  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 z9KsSlS ^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 0 .p $q  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 iAW oKW  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 FkT % -I  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 -OP5v8c f  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 +<I1@C  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 Py,@or7n  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ]0:R^dHE  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 @)8C  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 wwmODw<tT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 FJ&zU<E  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 8JAT2a61ur  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 R:JS)>B  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 r^6v o6^  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 'lNl><e-  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 JXnPKAN  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 63- YWhs;  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes ,@ Cru=  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 u]c nbm  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Cj):g,[a  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes f1>^kl3@P  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047  g^E n6n)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 {1YT a:evl  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes +=@Z5eu  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 z:R2Wksg  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 &f qmO>M  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 _.06^5o  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 fhn0^Qc"+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 o6K BJx  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 6YU2  !x  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 a^5`fA/L,  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 9e :E% 2  
    A?|cJ"N  
    Worst offenders: HNuwq\w  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change 2i(|?XJ^  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 U w`LWG3T  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 P[nWmY  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 mLY*  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 <p0$Q!^dK=  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 N<>dg  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 D+o.9I/{  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 c)6Y.[).  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 3Yj}ra}  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 X0Oq lAw  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 Sc~kO4  
    |f?C*t',  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: *E)Y?9u"  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 ^]R0d3?>\  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 T*T.\b  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 x(7K3(#|  
    r&3fSx9  
    Compensator Statistics: <7] z'  
    Change in back focus: #=.h:_9  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 'qd")  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 l*m|b""].u  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 t+(CAP|,  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 tl^[MLQa  
    0\~Zg  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: +tN-X'u##  
    Number of trials: 20 `A^} X  
    YYvs~?bAy  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution z"O-d<U5  
    M{4_BQ4$  
      Trial       Criterion        Change ]Ojt3) fB  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 x+TNF>%' D  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 hW+Dko(s  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 j5)qF1W,  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 r#}Sy \  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 HYH!;  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 ha),N<'  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 N+V-V-PVk  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 DJW1kR  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 E0pQRGPA  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 |5/[0V-vy  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 d#tUG~jc  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 UK<"|2^sT  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 XN0Y#l  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 O&s6blD11  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 an2Tc*=~l(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 Mvh_>-i  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 4>E2G:  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 By_Ui6:D  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 [Bh]\I'  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 Z7/dRc   
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 YBO53S]=  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 !jW32$YTR  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 s?E:]  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 ?f`-&c;  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 aS7zG2R4H  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 >D;hT*3  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 YC_^jRB8n  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 / fq6-;co+  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 @i h}x  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 -CrZ'k;4  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 g3XAs@  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 7. .vaq#  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 7e<Q{aB  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 ,H?p9L; qp  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 t_rDXhM  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 ;^*!<F%t9R  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 h<.[U $,  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 gNd J=r4  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 8TPm[r]  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 ^-!HbbVv  
    |7$h@KF=S  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 hI8C XG  
    z{d5Lrk  
    Nominal     0.54403234 "/?qT;<$)  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 .[fz x`  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 QO.gt*"  
    Mean        0.35770970 ODEXQl}R  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 '5U$`Xe1  
    SEIu4 l$E  
    Y(zN  
    Compensator Statistics: c1J)yv1y  
    Change in back focus: ([-=NT}Aq  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 `W n5 .V  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 1}E@lOc  
    Mean               :         0.161872 q4iD59yd)S  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 QP%Fz#u`  
    )^Pvm  
    90% >       0.20977951               J\'5CG  
    80% >       0.22748071               l%(`<a]VIB  
    50% >       0.38667627               t`,IW{  
    20% >       0.46553746               -<!17jy  
    10% >       0.50064115                %UQB?dkf$  
    i t@}dZ  
    End of Run. >}{-!  
    }>~>5jc/Pg  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 wPJRp]FA  
    %i>e  
    AsLjU#jn  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 FT>~ES]cQd  
    7$W;4!BN*  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 )YMlF zYr  
    80% >       0.22748071                 3E}NiD\V}  
    50% >       0.38667627                 JkDPuTXD  
    20% >       0.46553746                 <cv2-?L{  
    10% >       0.50064115 W0MnGzZ  
    )d(0Y<e @  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? 0 \Yx.\X,  
    |1+(Ny.%k  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   25a#eDbqi  
    fb"J Bc}X  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : ;'=VrE6  
    90% >       0.20977951                 [i(Cl}  
    80% >       0.22748071                 v9E+(4I9_  
    50% >       0.38667627                 |?x^8e<*  
    20% >       0.46553746                 0 &*P}U}Uc  
    10% >       0.50064115 E\R raPkQT  
    ....... W il{FcHY  
    +P [88!  
    ]`zjRRd  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   tgO+*q5B  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 13ipaz  
    Sampling            : 2 `aO.=:O_  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 7'_nc!ME  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 G$cxDGo  
    5Xwk*@t2a  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? ZR1+ O 8  
    (.PmDBW  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试