切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16165阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 fuIv,lDA  
    q4#f *]  
    8BoT%kVeJv  
    6pdl,5[x-  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 I}]@e ^ ~  
    :\w[xqH  
    $y]||tX  
    { ves@p>?  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: *~lgU4  
    "}~i7NBB  
    Analysis of Tolerances (gJ )]/n  
    ~m;MM)_V  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX 9'*ZEl^?D  
    Title: 4>wIF}\  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 94k)a8-!  
    K1wN9D{t'  
    Units are Millimeters. FsPDWy&x  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. 1j) !d$8  
    QGCdeE$K  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. J7xT6Q=  
    %F]9^C+  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. H* L2gw  
    kI[O{<kQ  
    Mnemonics: o:Os_NaD  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. gBiQIhz  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. R_*D7|v  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. 7[.Q.3FL  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. +}L3T"  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). _Ag/gu2-?  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). {'Qk>G s  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). Y" +1,?yH  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. W<hdb!bE  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. en#g<on  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. P)j9\ muc  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). JW.&uV1Z  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). OFL+Q~~C  
     yLIj4bf  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. Zow^bzy4  
    lXk-86[M  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. SoGLsO+R  
    HF=C8ZtlL  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm {hq ;7  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 'GdlqbX(%  
    Sampling            : 2 xS-nO_t 'E  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 }br<2?y,  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 C05{,w?  
    y<x_v )k-  
    a.U:B [v`  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees W]Y!ZfGnN  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY ?UhAjtYIS  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 D}/.;]w<[&  
    ~U*N'>'=)  
    Sensitivity Analysis: h+u|MdOY\  
    ?$&rC0 t  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| MdboWE5i  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change hA1hE?c`  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 9X&qdA/q  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 AdS_-Cm  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 #_L&  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 pC. 4AkEO  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 ,) jB<`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000  eV=sDx  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 O|TwG:!  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 lGBdQc]IL  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000  (mD:[|.  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 n ~i4yn=  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 w8#>xV^~  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5$Q`P',*Ua  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 Ywk[VD+.  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 AS"|r  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 QAnfxt6  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 Nv]/L +i  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 Uk ;.Hrt.  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 [Et\~'2w8=  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 qa`(,iN  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 aYCzb7  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 kL2sJX+  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) vjRD?kF  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 @gGuV$Mw  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 OiEaVPSI;  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) /Z_ [)PTH  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 \~j(ui|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ]@T `q R  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 7TY"{? ~O5  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 .Tqvy)'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 J|8YB3K,  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 {#Cm> @')  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 &: 8&;vk  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 :%]R x&08  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 %--5bwZi  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 JT^0AZ_*  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 1Nu`@)D0  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 0DT2qM[,  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 emIbGkH  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 R}<s~` Pl  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 ;|,Y2?  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 RA67w&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 &c ~)z\$  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 I;Y`rGj  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 r:Cid*~m  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 N |L5Ru  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 640V&<+v  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 7)wq9];w  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5R G5uH/-<  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 Fa^]\:  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 '2{o_<m  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ee` =B  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 "g[UX{L  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 q2i~<;Z)9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 YL0RQa  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 M_I\:Q  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 w2AWdO6  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 }CqIKoX.  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 UbH=W(%  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 Vk T3_f  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 sxa (  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 W)O'( D  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 dBn.DU*B  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 r{&"]'/X  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes 1_]l|`Po  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 n8,/olqwW  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Z] }@#/ n  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes >@iV!!  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 ghiElsBU  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 s yvi/6  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes 8 EH3zm4  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 .?NAq[H%  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 n_glYSV!  
    Index tolerance on surface 1  JwcP[w2  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 F4Z0g*^x  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 0[Aa2H*  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 iOxygs#p  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 >?<d}9X  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 (^\i(cfu6Q  
    fsu "Lc  
    Worst offenders: VvKH]>*  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change [%:NR  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 7]bq s"t  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 uM#/  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 k/O&,T77}J  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 5H2|:GzUc  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 1cega1s3xR  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 .jw)e!<\N  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ZS]e}]Zwp  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 1<5yG7SZ  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 i|Wn*~yFOO  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 o 8U2vMH  
    cPSu!u}D  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: ]W,g>91m  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 L_|Y_=r."  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 In2D32"F  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 `R^VK-=C  
    2BY:qz%:  
    Compensator Statistics: t60m:k4J  
    Change in back focus: )9O{4PbU!  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 KNhH4K2iP8  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 Xqk$[ peS  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 rOGJ%|%(  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 cAS5&T<  
    Ycwb1e#  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: P.0-(  
    Number of trials: 20 0a5P@;"a  
    ';%g^!lM a  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution I uDk9<[b:  
    zD'gGxM1  
      Trial       Criterion        Change V<7Gd8rDMM  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 b;{C1aa>}  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 Df9}YI ;?  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 #0c`"2t&M  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 JQqDUd  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 "O`;zC  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 Hw Is7  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 tznT*EQr  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 "M tQj}  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 ~+F: QrXcI  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 V*N9D>C  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 7blZAA?-  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 =@'"\ "Nh  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 t9}XO M*  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 ZI1RB fR  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 zV]0S o  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 ':=C2x1d|  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 fiZ8s=J  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 m:t $&  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 $lQi0*s  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393  <KpQu%2(  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 Z7v~;JzC#  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 2:abe  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 .&Z Vy{uP  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 2a^(8A`7W  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 ATU@5,9  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 @P-7a`3*  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 \?o%<c5{  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 ` C1LR,J  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 sM-*[Q=_  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 4Y]`> ;w  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 hug12Cu  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 >@X=E3  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 Um~jp:6p  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 s-*XAn ot  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 k}/: xN"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 8|l Yf%n>j  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 3B0%:Jj  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 UaBR;v-.B3  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 75F&s,4+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 }yw\+fc  
    Bw$-*FYE  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 Rm RV8 WJ6  
    ^~0 r+w61  
    Nominal     0.54403234 Q -+jG7vT  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 LV[4zo]=  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 ^ey\ c1K  
    Mean        0.35770970 OV[-m;h|  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 M;E&@[5  
    bhI8b/  
    I}:/v$btM  
    Compensator Statistics: M]W4S4&Y=  
    Change in back focus: 29GiNy+ob  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 dcA0k  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 A-~)7-  
    Mean               :         0.161872 ~7m+cWC-+  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 U t%ie=c  
    H0Tt(:.&  
    90% >       0.20977951               _+{s^n=  
    80% >       0.22748071               1~*_H_Q't  
    50% >       0.38667627               PyoLk  
    20% >       0.46553746               +X< Z 43  
    10% >       0.50064115                pp:+SoyN  
    ;8A_- $  
    End of Run. B<)(7GTv7"  
    #8`G&S*  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 /; _"A)0  
    BP7_o63/G  
    E )PEKWK\  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 83dOSS2  
    >hXUq9;:  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 H: U_k68  
    80% >       0.22748071                 )I*V('R6|  
    50% >       0.38667627                 %~eZrG.  
    20% >       0.46553746                 )~Q$ tM`  
    10% >       0.50064115 !is8`8F8  
    u%T.XgY=j  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? 0D\FFfs  
    s2tEyR+gW  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   _x:K%1_[  
    dx~F [  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : l_$~~z ~  
    90% >       0.20977951                 z<)?8tAgq  
    80% >       0.22748071                 sYeZ.MacU  
    50% >       0.38667627                 Mj[ v _&N  
    20% >       0.46553746                 > Y LwWU<X  
    10% >       0.50064115 lPx4I  
    ....... G`w7dn;&  
    sfx:j~bsL  
    V}3.K\7  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   Z1*y$=D?3[  
    Mode                : Sensitivities MX  qH  
    Sampling            : 2 C <]rY  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 ck-wMd  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 lO)p  
    O+c@B}[!  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? ;,4Z5+  
    J?u",a]|H"  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试