切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16280阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 >|<8QomD  
    qXPT1%+)y  
    /0(2PVf y  
    ]h0Fv-[A  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 >n,RBl  
    pWo`iM& F  
    !!Tk'=t9"3  
    .r9-^01mG  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: )^+v*=Dc-i  
    pdnkHR$  
    Analysis of Tolerances \~H; Wt5  
    xNG 'UbU  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX 7 4rmxjiN  
    Title: k0|*8  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 6&(gp(F  
    H \ $04vkR  
    Units are Millimeters. &I8,<(`  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. MpbH!2J  
    &*TwEN^h  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. ^H'zS3S  
    S5:`fo^5  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. 1x+Y gL5  
    !ndc <],  
    Mnemonics: <fX]`57Dc`  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. o[AQS`  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. E.v~<[g  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. ^FSUK  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. jKV,i?  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). ;^)(q<]  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). 7)zn[4v7qt  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). /ZAS%_as  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. l 6wX18~XJ  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. Ba/Z<1)  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. zn5  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). [V`j@dV  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). pyK|zvr-r  
    sMAc+9G9k  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. {.9phW4Vr?  
    |xaJv:96%  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. (;=:QjaoZ  
     eWO^n>Y  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm se](hu~w  
    Mode                : Sensitivities kvh}{@|-  
    Sampling            : 2 =Haqr*PDx  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 B\&;eZY'G  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 +r)'?zU  
     N7j  
    -A}*Aa'\  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees ~o`I[-g)  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY q#B^yk|Y  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 &F" Mkyf  
    4cK6B)X  
    Sensitivity Analysis: qPdNI1 |  
    0 1[LPN  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| 'j=7'aX>K  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change  D/hQ{T  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 E)|_7x<u  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 pYV$sDlD  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 yvo~'k#c  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 0 3L"W^gc  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 uf,4GPo,  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 <by}/lF0  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 "iE9X.6NMu  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 p~M1}mE  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 =tl[?6  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 MP,l*wVd  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 GqhnE>  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 +v%V1lf^~  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 +]Of f^s  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 zcItZP  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 P%>? O :a  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 [6qa"Ie  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 ~,yHE3B\G  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _)Uw-vhQiT  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 &9\z!r6mc  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 PPT"?lt*&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 qWe1`.o  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) J) v~  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 aR.1&3fE  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 *!UY;InanX  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) w3:WvA5jt  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 { 'Hi_b3  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 dz.]5R  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 Ojp)OeF\  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 rKq/=Avv  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 %*P59%  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 !c:Q+:,H  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 Rk^Fasg"  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 qEKTSet?  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 ,.tT9? m  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 H V<|eL #  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 wo7.y["$  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 AY:3o3M  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Mw7!w-1+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 c\UVMyE  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 @lAOi1m,,  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 =If% m9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 nL@ "FZ`(  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 4NbX! "0  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 )eGGA6G  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 bv0B  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 n1o/-UY  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 B?-RzWB\3  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ;OmmXygl  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 X`]-) (U X  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 !U}A1)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 nul?5{z@  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 C<fWDLwYqV  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 +FQ:Q+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ];6c/#2x  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 k);z}`7  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 QRdNi 1&M  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 7Upm  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 m\7-/e2 a  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 M$-4.+G  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 u#%Ig3  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 xPb;_~  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 m{!BSl  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 L@S"c (  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes 5}9-)\8=z  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 [6 wI22  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 3XY$w&f  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes r\vB-nJ  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 Ql%7wrK  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 n=r}jRH1  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes Vv' e,m  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 (y^oGY;  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 *x`z5_yfO  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 y 4,2Xs9,  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 og MLv}  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 O 4N_lr~  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 <,Sy:>:"  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 @S?.`o  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 /}2 bsiJT  
    qh0)~JL4   
    Worst offenders: <Nv w w  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change WRh&4[G'  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Jl Q%+$  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 E{T\51V]%  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 A/{pG#if]3  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 uByF*}d1  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 #i ?@S$  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 #1hT#YN  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 10}oaL S  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 KwPJ0 ]('_  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 rZu_"bcJ  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 k}ps-w6:  
    98Srn63O  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: 2-llT  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 MGc=TQ.  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 jm RYL("  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 ;DC0LJ  
    <ofXNv;`  
    Compensator Statistics: KblOP{I  
    Change in back focus: -/x +M-X#  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 m8 0+b8b  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 "1%<IqpU+  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 :1_hQeq  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 |r}%AN6+  
    IS&`O= 7  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: vlyq2>TfR  
    Number of trials: 20 YtW#MG$f  
    P|h<|Gcp  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution ?[RG8,B  
    ^+`vh0TPQ  
      Trial       Criterion        Change Redp'rXT<h  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 [2i+f <  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 MF 5w.@62X  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 4Xz6JJ1U[H  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 *!Am6\+  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 |\QR9>  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 + W@r p#  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 W3<O+S&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 d.2b7q09  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 07(E/A]  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 yqejd_cd  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 6\5U%~78  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 Hkg@M?(  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 H5&>Eny  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 7[D0n7B@  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 * D AgcB  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 _'I9rGlx3  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 _ <>+Dk&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 UBqK$2 #  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 T^ sxR4F  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 %i.|bIhmm  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 T{)!>)  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 6:B5PJq  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 @J r  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 8z/^Ql  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 N.64aL|1  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 kk~{2   
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744  fx;5j;  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 mceSUKI;L  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 SN]/~>/  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 qWanr7n]@  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 [w{ZP4d>  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 ZzKn,+  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 sm_:M| [D  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 qS2%U?S7  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 =pk'a_P 8-  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 :lE7v~!Z  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 I7uYsjh@u  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 ko5\*!|:lj  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 #e|eWi>  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 ~(Tz <  
    {>+$u"*  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 ]-}a{z  
    #t/Q4X +  
    Nominal     0.54403234 TuF:m"4  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 ;m5M: Z"  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 iF%q 6R  
    Mean        0.35770970 yr=r? h}  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 yq<YGNy!  
    %]R#}amW  
    YLCwo]\+>  
    Compensator Statistics: :?p{ga9  
    Change in back focus: xO.7cSqgw  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 ;=7z!:)  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 }`MO}Pz  
    Mean               :         0.161872 #E ~FF@a  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 t]` 2f3UO  
    0)/214^&  
    90% >       0.20977951               )F~_KD)7jJ  
    80% >       0.22748071               Y{O&- 5H^|  
    50% >       0.38667627               Ym6ec|9;  
    20% >       0.46553746               $bo^UYZ6  
    10% >       0.50064115                gO/(/e>P  
    x$Dv&4  
    End of Run. 2tbqmWw/s  
    H,I}R  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 cpy"1=K~M  
    C{ti>'"V  
    y H'\<bT  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 |`okIqp  
    =QC^7T  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 V9 VP"kD  
    80% >       0.22748071                 6:,^CI|@ t  
    50% >       0.38667627                 9X%Klm 5w  
    20% >       0.46553746                 _E;Y ~I,i  
    10% >       0.50064115 v2{O67j} o  
    p[)<d_  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? ]'Yw#YB  
    /RM-+D:Y  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   @>]3xHE6#=  
    kut|A  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : 9jGuelwN  
    90% >       0.20977951                 d[e:}1  
    80% >       0.22748071                 k(z<Bm  
    50% >       0.38667627                 Z,!Xxv;4  
    20% >       0.46553746                 1{x~iZa  
    10% >       0.50064115 ASZ5;N4u  
    ....... yj'' \  
    ;K\N  
    h Yc{ 9$  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   j(6$7+2qN  
    Mode                : Sensitivities *76viqY;dE  
    Sampling            : 2 G:c8`*5Q  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 HS6Imi  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 4ZJT[zi  
    SXBQ  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? =EcIXDzC>  
    sh !~T<yy  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试