切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 15103阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 ch,|1}bi  
    0o68rF5^s  
    F RH&B5w  
    >C2HC6O3  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 /e5\9  
    >rRf9wO1l  
    1~qm+nET\  
    k46gY7y,9  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: iK x+6v  
    vw r RZ"2  
    Analysis of Tolerances Gc5VQ^]  
    u_'nOle K  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX eti9nPjG  
    Title: jyjQzt >\  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 rdI]\UH  
    2NR7V*A  
    Units are Millimeters. ?Y!U*& 7  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. p+D=}O  
    ;F,qS0lzE  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. V [4n'LcE  
    k|ip?O  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. {"4<To]z  
    /W9 &Ke  
    Mnemonics: %AgA -pBp  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. 9UmBm#"  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. ;vUxO<cKFq  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. z+6QZQk  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. D% @KRcp^b  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). #O6 EP#B  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). yam}x*O\xn  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). $F1_^A[  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. : ~'Z(-a  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. # `58F.  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. Z3 n~&!  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). 7%opzdS#  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). 4f jC  
    q4k`)?k9  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. w7ZG oh(  
    zkG>u,B}  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. =f4< ({9  
    |<2 *v-a  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm |Pf(J;'[  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 2|s<[V3rP-  
    Sampling            : 2 zze z~bv7:  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 ]F_r6*<  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 w #<^RKk  
    Z{#"-UG  
    59K}  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees QD}1?)}  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY @4&, #xo  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 (qj,GmcS  
    ;fkSrdj  
    Sensitivity Analysis: W{\EE[XhCf  
    'FqEB]gu  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| tU(y~)]  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change SLg+H  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 zw< 4G[u  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 OuNj:  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 drs-mt8  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 h$|3dz N  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 }!=gP.Zu^  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 j;G[%gi6{  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 H)`@2~Y  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 [Ek42%  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 DQMPAj.  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 _2#zeT5  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 OZa88&  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 PE|PwqX  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 %`eJ66T  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 qj`,qm P  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 KS?mw`Nr  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 % mJ~F*Dy  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 q;ZLaX\bFl  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 CJv> /#$/F  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 Q%I#{+OT  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 Ma>:_0I5  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 T!1SMo^  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) 8.[&wy U  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 ))p$vU3  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 i,([YsRuou  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) u]P03B  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 _yNT=#/  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 luibB&p1  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 zuk"  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 Ut]2`8-  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 sRi?]9JIl  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 TF%3uH  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 A*a7\id!y  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 8W;xi:CC  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 ^Wif!u/HM  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 xC[~Fyhp  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 3mk=ZWwv  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 | xp$OL"a  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Q,D0kS P  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ';&0~[R[  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 Wgav>7!9  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 RzpC1nd  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 m5)EQE}gPp  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 UOw~rK   
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 jYrym-  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 P87ld._  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 L'13BRu`  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 d[) _sa  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 C/CN '  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 ax<g0=^R  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 }iD$4\ L  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 $4DFgvy$  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 yQ8M >H#J  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 "EN98^ Sl  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 3b+7^0frY#  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 4g>1G qv6  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 &}>|5>cJu  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /.7$`d  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 Yr5iZ~V$  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 C5>{Q:.`e'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 xR *5q1j  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 {An8/"bv}  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 &1*4%N@'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 `@4 2jG}*  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes Sc%aJ1  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 Uc\|X;nkRk  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ooomi"u  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes b;Hm\aK  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 6lN?)<uQ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 M_qP!+Y  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes +]A+!8%Z  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 uG2Xkj  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 -" 2<h:#  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 kSLSxfR  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 J f\Qf  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 8dr0 DF$c  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 X QI.0L"  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 ,@}W@GGP)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 'Y hA  
    UN,<6D3\b  
    Worst offenders: +F1]M2p]  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change 3js)niT9u  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 OI'uH$y  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 bq c;.4$  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 &W&7bZ$;  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 yfPCGCOW?  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 bk/.<Rt  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 [P.@1mV  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 C*"Rd   
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 vs5 D:cZ}  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 `Mo~EHso.  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 EZ:I$X  
    &i4 (s%z#  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: 6&g!ZE'G  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 WpZy](,  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 Q'FX:[@x-S  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 M \ :"~XW  
    :GN)7|:  
    Compensator Statistics: OwNAN  
    Change in back focus: #]?,gwvTf  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 F7k4C2r  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 .a 'ETNY:>  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 $=\oJ-(!@S  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 @/_XS4  
    x(C]O,  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: X !&"&n  
    Number of trials: 20 H j>L>6>  
    D]t~S1ycG7  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution 7VEt4  
    |u?k-,uI9  
      Trial       Criterion        Change OlD7-c2L]  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 ,U|u-.~ZU  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 o`<h=+a\  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 J,dG4.ht  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 Wh#_9);  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 d&GKfF  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 +^^S'mP8  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 >m)2ox_B  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 [8V(N2  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 S*~Na]nS0  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 LM'*OtpDG  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 zJB+C=]D7H  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 Li?{e+g  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 S>/I?(J  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 (P]^8qc  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 : L6-{9$  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 )_x8?:lv  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 ql%]$`IV6  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783  6Dr$*9  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 _js2^<7v}  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 K8Kz  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 (&N$W&  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 &gKP6ANx2  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 I&Eg-96@  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 Tko CyD9  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 @=aq&gb  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 +e{djp@m  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 OTy 4"%  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 h!JjN$  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 l*m]2"n]  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 nKZRq&~^E  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 -Z\UYt  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 Qh1Kl_a?Lv  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 a*$1la'Uf  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 OFPd6,(E  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 =t>`< T|(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 BZ'y}Zu*  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 ^5zS2nm  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 'amex  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 5p>]zij>  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 TTw~.x,  
    L>R!A3G1  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 JY,l#?lM{  
    Nr*ibtz|D  
    Nominal     0.54403234 zs]>XO~Jg  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 ph|2lLZ  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 /[)P^L`  
    Mean        0.35770970 #ui%=ja[:~  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 jWb\"0)  
    |H|eH~.yg&  
    B'#gs'fl  
    Compensator Statistics: b ffml  
    Change in back focus: A<G ;  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 EXM/>PG  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 ywa.cq  
    Mean               :         0.161872  OG<]`!"  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 4dD@lG~  
    GmWQJYX\  
    90% >       0.20977951               u+i/CE#w  
    80% >       0.22748071               !*QA;*e  
    50% >       0.38667627               }v|[h[cZ  
    20% >       0.46553746               Z~R/ p;@  
    10% >       0.50064115                &G5I0:a   
    <k8rSx n{  
    End of Run. u*YuU%H=  
    K {N;k-  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 tYxlM!  
    oGjYCVc  
    :.o0<  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 hD~/6bx  
    5;%xqdD  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 zm.sX~j  
    80% >       0.22748071                 0To 5|r  
    50% >       0.38667627                 c_=zd6 b$S  
    20% >       0.46553746                 Ft>8 YYyU  
    10% >       0.50064115 "TCbO`mg  
    f)fw87UPc  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? (8/xSOZ[  
    J@-9{<  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   }tq9 /\  
    3hjwwLKG$  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : OZD/t(4?6s  
    90% >       0.20977951                  AHb   
    80% >       0.22748071                 jEadVM9  
    50% >       0.38667627                 eAj}/2y"  
    20% >       0.46553746                 Gu pKM%kM  
    10% >       0.50064115 TV}SKvu  
    ....... SzDi= lY  
    K;~dZ  
    7pNh|#Uv'  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   m{g{"=}YR  
    Mode                : Sensitivities >y?$aJ8ZV  
    Sampling            : 2 Bn.8wMB  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 #>0nNR[$Y  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 mVxS[Gq  
    f-Sb:O!V  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? Eq|_> f@@8  
    !Ed';yfz\(  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试