切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16201阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 VU9P\|c@<  
    *GP_ut%  
    Jr)`shJ"  
    OL5HofgNm  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 5Q`n6x|  
    ?(yFwR,(  
    ~uadivli  
    1m;*fs  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: F|TMpH/  
    f<Tz#w&6W  
    Analysis of Tolerances v&2@<I>  
    DA`sm  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX 1Uk~m  
    Title: yB%)D0  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 xc.D!Iav  
    c8tC3CrKp=  
    Units are Millimeters. ]fo^43rn{  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. BWdc^  
    f\|?_k]  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. FK# E7 K  
    2 pa3}6P+  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. e=sJMzm~  
    :gscW& k  
    Mnemonics: w/5^R  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. |qcFmy  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. ^z}lGu  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. +'KE T,  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. !]+Z%ed`%  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). e>9Z:vY  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). : 5<9/  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). wZ8 MhE  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. A]Tcj^#  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. fGf-fh;s  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. ?%/u/*9rj  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). ywynx<Wg  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). ~vSAnjeR  
    V!77YFen %  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. ?4[Oh/]R  
    _T|H69 J  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. 4bev* [k  
    i4zV(  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm C]yQ "b  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 76A>^Bs\/  
    Sampling            : 2 _b_?9b-)D  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 U5CPkH1  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 {XD/8m(hN|  
    X";Z Up  
    !Nl.Vb  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees w zqd g  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY ;=+Zw1/g  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 $@_t5?n``F  
    I+"?,Ej$K  
    Sensitivity Analysis: .^~l_ LkA  
    xDGS`U  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| VkDS&g~Ws  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change 4s~HfxYT  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 H >:4MY  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 daB l%a=  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 \} Acq;  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 6L,lq;  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 9Ue7 ~"=  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Cb{A:\>Q{  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 }\f(qw  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 ^{*f3m/  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 (#bp`Kih  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 Y62u%':X  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 TD{=L*{+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /MKNv'5&!%  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 $xA J9_2P  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 Lo9G4Cu  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 O~h94 B`  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 ~mK-8U4>K,  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 <r<Dmn|\a  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _}zo /kDA  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 s[3![ "^Y  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 jF2[bzY4  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 7Aio`&^  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) G(As%r]  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 -VWCD,c  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 lmhbF  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) #d Z/UM(u  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 VFl 1 f  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 %6A-OF  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 Y9i9Uc.]  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 =t3vbV  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5#0A`QO   
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 %j *k  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 j|[(*i%7|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _Z+jQFKJ\8  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 `6Ureui2?  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 jby~AJf %  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 S5~`T7Ra  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 h L]8e>a?  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 AanH{  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 jCTy:q]  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 G la@l<  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 Dac ^*k=D  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 {sC@N![  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 G{kj}>kS_  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 L1hD}J'$4  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 H]_WFiW-9  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 J>=1dCK  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 +/y{^}b/  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ytjK++(T5  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2  Y*@|My`  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 3ppuQ Q  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 :E>&s9Yj?  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 ,IIZ Xl@  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 w]};0v&\~s  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 eo1&.FQu  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 2GSgG.%SSM  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 #P(l2(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 })@tA<+  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 \F 3C=M@:  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 lPY@{1W  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 m@ i2#  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 M^z=1YrMd  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 =op`fn%  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 u4:\UC'  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes XtCoX\da  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 Bul.RCP'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 4|nQ=bIau  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes }0QN[$H!  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 _yj1:TtCNT  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 !\CG,Ek  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes 3brb*gI_b  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 G%a] j  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 kg<P t >  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 $+Vmwd;  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 }6).|^]\'  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 QhsMd- v  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 @ ]f3| >I  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 |GtY*|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 %N )e91wC  
    re; Lg C  
    Worst offenders: CoU3S,;*  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change A2y6UzLYD  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 eUt=n)*`  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 +UzXN$73  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 4E2yH6l  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 OU!nN>ln  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 8O6_iGTBh  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 {O)YwT$`  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 %y>+1hakkX  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 u?F (1iN =  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 20aZI2sk`  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 XYjcJ  
    ^] 6M["d/p  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: RU0i#suiz  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 Uo2+:p  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 V JDoH  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 vQ 4}WtvA  
    U;g S[8,p  
    Compensator Statistics: Okpwh kPL5  
    Change in back focus: Vo,[EVL  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 'w(y J  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 # :#M{1I  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 "V4Q2T T  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 NPm;  
    /s:w^ g~  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: gE\b 982  
    Number of trials: 20 !EOQhh  
    r| f-_D  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution MTb,Kmw<(  
    g:_hj_1Y M  
      Trial       Criterion        Change +Q)ULnie e  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 D+sQPymI  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 TnNWO+ kg  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 f2yq8/J8.  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 GAw(mH*  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 ?`"n3!>bS  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 #{$1z;i?f  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 *YtB )6j  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 ;L~p|sF  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 URA0ey`  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 KlN/\N\  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 :"<e0wDu[  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 @QdnjXII*  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 l4vTU=  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 *%\mZ,s"  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 2no$+4+z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 "_< 9PM1t  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 r|GY]9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 bO3GVc+S  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 sb^mLH] 3  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 7+nm31,<O  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 2.-o@im0  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 |0sPka/u16  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 "3fBY\>a  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 [Atc "X$  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 A&zS'toU  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 0{+.H_f`  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 Nxk(mec"  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 _c2WqQ-05  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 6e&$l-  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 ~_>cM c  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008  $dQIs:  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 gEwd &J  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 VUtXxvH  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 0[xpEiDx  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 &|9.}Z8U  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 /_t|Dry015  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 lpgd#vr  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 w0w1PE-V=  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 bgF^(T35  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 3mO;JXd  
    wL}l`fRB  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 R)5n 8  
    ''H"^oS  
    Nominal     0.54403234 /,s[#J   
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 L',mKOej  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 0uvzxmN  
    Mean        0.35770970 ZmEEj-*7s  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 M Hi8E9_O  
    i47j lyH  
    SA;#aj}rV  
    Compensator Statistics: S($Su7g%_  
    Change in back focus: s?rBE.g@}  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 0w=R_C)s  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 F;q#&  
    Mean               :         0.161872 lg$zGa?  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 % 0T+t.  
    F$V/K&&W  
    90% >       0.20977951               ^oM|<";!?D  
    80% >       0.22748071               !w39FfU{  
    50% >       0.38667627               YA:nOvd@O  
    20% >       0.46553746               ~" i0x  
    10% >       0.50064115                r(h`XMsU  
    9?<{_'  
    End of Run. pkgjTXR2b  
    NSQp< m  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 V  ~@^`Gd  
    /Ncm^b4  
    c;2#,m^  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 Wb}c=hZv  
    zfA GtT <  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 ]vWKR."4  
    80% >       0.22748071                 (8.Z..PH  
    50% >       0.38667627                 - K9c@?  
    20% >       0.46553746                 tg]x0#@s  
    10% >       0.50064115 Bp8'pj;~  
    3RLFp\i"s  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? y{dTp  
    @=}YTtq  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   z9FfU  
    x=ul&|^7D  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : <sBbT `  
    90% >       0.20977951                 %J+E/  
    80% >       0.22748071                 <g"{Wv: h  
    50% >       0.38667627                 e)d`pQ6  
    20% >       0.46553746                 &L=suDe  
    10% >       0.50064115 Dfmjw  
    ....... %nf6%@s  
    \W~ N  
    Z&1\{PG3*  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   !|^|,"A)  
    Mode                : Sensitivities ,o86}6Ag  
    Sampling            : 2 vS;RJg=  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 k\5c|Wq|g  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 z&zP)>Pv  
    ,E S0NA  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? y%"{I7!A  
    'j#*6xD  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试