切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 16245阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    在线sansummer
     
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 Fw!wSzsk3  
    I`"8}d@Jm  
    ]>fAV(ix  
    tx}} Kd  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 %4#,y(dO  
    NvH9?Ek"  
    Xz)UH<  
    Js7(TFQE  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: OU;R;=/]  
    74YMFI   
    Analysis of Tolerances 1{N73]-M:  
    h&eu}aF  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX Bw-<xwD  
    Title: \F]X!#&+  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 pKDP1S# <  
    _EeH  
    Units are Millimeters. '>[l1<d!G  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. ( zQ)EHRD  
    ~m^.&mv3/  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. Le3H!9lbc  
    ,4oYKJ$+h  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. 7Q,9j.  
    Wz)O,X^  
    Mnemonics: hn9'M!*:O  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. ;AV[bjRE\  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. n>]`8+a~%X  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. } ).rD  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. )1Rn;(j9Re  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). oTOr,Mn0\6  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). 5wM*(H^c[  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). x`8rR;N!  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. rU?sUm,ch  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. R?"sM<3`e  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. "]M:+mH{]  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). l`9<mL  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). *,$cW ,LN  
    1iWo* +5  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. )N[9r{3  
    6?y<F4  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. [{.e1s<EK  
    +We_[Re`<  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm 61|uvTX  
    Mode                : Sensitivities &u5OL?>  
    Sampling            : 2 AR9D;YfR~  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 tfzIem  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 :^7P. lhK  
    b&:>v9U  
    a12Q/K  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees H/8H`9S$  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY :s8^nEK  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 ; MU8@?yN  
    *`~ woF  
    Sensitivity Analysis: V1Yab#  
    z%xWP&3%"  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| ~WH4D+  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change oRl~x^[%[-  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 t']d_Vcza  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 +<5q8{]Pk  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 yuyI)ebC  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 @<]sW*s  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 D$C>ZF  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 3vx5dUgl,  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 \Eq,4-q  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 [ kI|Thx  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 f681i(q"  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 &L3OP@;  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 4 DhGp  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 E`#m0Q(8  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 I'&#pOB  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 NfG<!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 ?f@g1jJP  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 32y GIRV  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 ?y1']GAo  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 p,_,o3@~  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 0 p  6  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 u6hDjN  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 >*DR>U  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) >uVo 'S.  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 q18IqY*Lo  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 0ws1S(pq  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) cd_\?7  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 YU=Q`y[k  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Ul"9zTH  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 MBy0Ky  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 ze* =7  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 0,1x- yD  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 F@m]Imn5Dx  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 :H9\nU1  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 +ucj>g1(#  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 pib i#  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ~Mk{2;x  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _~q!<-Z  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 )OjTn"  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ?D 8<}~Do  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 JmMB=} <  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 @9,=|kxK  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 R/!lDv!  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 T@K= * p  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 \X3Q,\H @  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 Uh6LU5  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Vq8G( <77  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 }~W:3A{7;  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 :/rl \woA>  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 zN3[W`q+m  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 eBlWwUy*6f  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 dO?zLc0f  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /l.:GH36f  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 '3%JhG)#  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 ;_$Q~X  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5OHg% ^  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 *}F>c3x]  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 @`Fv}RY{  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 b#uNdq3  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 |}^me7C,[  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 B#Q` !B4v  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 fL xGaOT  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 Uu_g_b:z  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 I |PEC-(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ni2GZ<1j  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes Q!9  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 GG0H3MSc  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 bEQy5AX  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes <bSG|VqnH  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 jF$bCbAUce  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 DB~3(r?K  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes ^"dVz.  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 lF*}l  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 eeVDU$*e=  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 pwF+ZNo  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 uBp,_V?  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 hD> ]\u  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 %IA1Y>`  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 8=K%7:b  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 a/\SPXQ/9  
    n%faD  
    Worst offenders: -R]Iu\  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change V),wDyi  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 GyC/39<P  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 kk`K)PESi  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 '2S/FOb  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 =,B Dd$e  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ]KQv ]'  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 opXxtYC@  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 IdS=lN$  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 k~0#Iy_{M  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 o5@d1A  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 _ez*dE%  
    b I-uF8"  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: Ao )\/AR'  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 o&t*[#  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 &%UZ"CcA  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 q"48U.}T  
    A=Y A#0  
    Compensator Statistics: |Q(3rcOrV"  
    Change in back focus: 4 -CGe  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 }>5R9  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 bJ"}-s+Dx  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 .9u0WP95  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 9xN`  
    n2(`O^yd7C  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: lt{D f~c  
    Number of trials: 20 )krBj F.$  
    XtZeT~/7RT  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution 8I}ATc  
    .rw a=IW  
      Trial       Criterion        Change {'-^CoR  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 S`Xx('!/|  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 b$eN]L   
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 ^, &'  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 Ak dx1h,  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 c(kYCVc   
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 {/|tVc63  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 OcE,E6LD  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 wX4gyr  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 dHkI9;  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 { .j030Q  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 BM o2t'L  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 1 )H;}%[  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 .T1n"TfsGO  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 G@3Jw[t  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 =E$B0^_2RC  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 pkE4"M!3=  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 P8X59^cJ  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 @iU(4eX  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 C"0vMUZ  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 RhWW61!"  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 zEKVyZd*{  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 U+Vb#U7;  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 }0C v J4  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 #Y0ru9  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 Gn%"B6  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 ja4zLf(<  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 >rYkVlv  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 ;LC?3.  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 ]-sgzM]q  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 :CsrcT=  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 [;Jq=G8&t  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 'si{6t|  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 k#n%at.g  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 oh7tE$"c  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 eGLB,29g  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 Os/?iGlD*E  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 0}"'A[xE  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 :rU,7`sE/  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 L%<DLe^P`l  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 \b}%A&Ij  
    A[`2Mnj  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 Ki>XLX,er=  
    h2 y<vO  
    Nominal     0.54403234 ( e#f  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 s~m]>^?8MR  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 KJv[z   
    Mean        0.35770970 y"|gC!V}  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 %R<xe.X  
    XM)  
    `PT'Lakf;3  
    Compensator Statistics: ; Kh!OBZFo  
    Change in back focus: WFTwFm6  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 8 q>  
    Maximum            :         1.611296  L+CPT  
    Mean               :         0.161872 9w6 uoM  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 Wjli(sT#-  
    VV/aec8  
    90% >       0.20977951               '?6j.ms M  
    80% >       0.22748071               )|GYxG;8C  
    50% >       0.38667627               rY M@e  
    20% >       0.46553746               ~ \b~  
    10% >       0.50064115                7#7AK}   
    *6G@8TIh  
    End of Run. %Iiu#- 'B  
    t)mc~M9w  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 }/4),W@<  
    [ @2$W?0i  
    ;u=%Vn"2a  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 BZ(DP_}&D  
    4Ik'beZqK  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 Xpt9$=d  
    80% >       0.22748071                 7* [  
    50% >       0.38667627                 0\, !  
    20% >       0.46553746                 -!V{wD3,B  
    10% >       0.50064115 yMC6 Gvp  
    T=RabKVYP  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? 5hh6;)  
    )Cat$)I#,  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   C{+JrHV%h  
    !,C8  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : a5/Dz&>j6  
    90% >       0.20977951                 >>"@ 0tO  
    80% >       0.22748071                 3g5r}Ug  
    50% >       0.38667627                 ruyQ}b:zS  
    20% >       0.46553746                 bUds E 1f  
    10% >       0.50064115 ,el[A`b  
    ....... xE$lx:C"FU  
    $o9@ ?2  
    u^#e7u  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   M4CC&?6\  
    Mode                : Sensitivities SU6Aq?`@  
    Sampling            : 2 1L!jI2~x}  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 +_u~Np  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 }qWB=,8HQ  
    pU[yr'D.r  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? 8V9OMOt!  
    yy&L&v'  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    在线sansummer
    发帖
    959
    光币
    1087
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1899
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试