切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19484阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview xb9Pc.A[  
    xS;|j j9  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability VqK%^  
    3XeXzPj  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools 3Q'[Ee2-3  
    [j)\v^m  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses UL86-R!  
    , CJAzGBS  
    User Interface $ A-+E\vQ@  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only $_Y/'IN`k  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous fCgBH~w,9  
    p"Ot5!F >  
    Modeling h ?uqLsRl  
    Most elements cannot be edited `J72+RA  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) 1 6"#i  
    No unboolean capability H@V 7!d  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time 81~Kpx  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Ck: 9gn  
    wMGk!N  
    Ray Trace  3P1&;  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace U#bl=%bF  
    No point sources; no volume sources g& k58{e  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) moMYdArj  
    7|YN:7iA  
    Analysis Mi ; glm  
    No illumination error estimate Wt^|BjbB4  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” f;gZ|a  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres h4/X 0@l`  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro e*C6uz9N  
    JqCc;Cbd  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro o%[U  
    Interactive ray trace |%1?3Mpn  
    Editable geometry B@O@1?c[  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) 99=s4*xzM  
    Wkzs<y"  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented ]XeO0Y  
    3D textures JN'cXZJPn  
    Source definition ~ttY(w CV  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist Y+~g\z-]c  
    2Y!S_Hw8  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition /`npQg-  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface !yOeW0/2[  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) ;8{cA_&  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities _-~`03 `!  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) q2rUbU_A(  
    ]aryV?!6  
    TracePro features not in LT ,Gk}"w  
    Ray trace through GRIN material -fI@])$9J  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP W1B)]IHc  
    c#IYFTz  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT S& #U!#@  
    E37<"(;  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT 38DT2<qC  
    h:zK(;  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT)  Uo12gIX  
    `Q3s4VEC  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT rNjn~c  
    B+C);WQ,  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) *KY=\ %D  
    N,2s?Y_!  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP 0;4t&v7  
    mC?i}+4>4R  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons _k8A$s<d  
    [,2|Flf e  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP MlLb|!,)T  
    xI>A6  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software Y"-^%@|p  
    Z2im@c67{  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools R+&jD;U{  
    sP^R/z|Y  
    ^pJ!isuqu  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 $.9{if#o&  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented $95h2oXt  
    TEDAb >  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 oh$Q6G  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 =0;^(/1Mc  
        NJNJjdD>  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!