切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19119阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview .q}k  
    _ @76eZd  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability y5h[^K3  
    fdW={}~  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools  I ^92b  
    X.|0E87  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses Bk <P~-I  
    r U5'hK  
    User Interface 7C^ nk z  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only Y.#+Yh[  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous B[50{;X  
    {*Pp^ r  
    Modeling R0'EoX  
    Most elements cannot be edited k =_@1b-  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) g7i6Yj1  
    No unboolean capability U7?ez  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time xM\ApN~W  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses t`B']Ac;T  
    gG>>ynn  
    Ray Trace g(k|"g`*  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace /G;yxdb  
    No point sources; no volume sources P+h&tXZn8  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) OFv} jT  
    p6'8l~W+  
    Analysis AAcbY;  
    No illumination error estimate ri ~2t3gg  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” g_U69 z  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres $}fA;BP  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro 3 6 ;hg #  
    CCV~nf  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro intf%T5#  
    Interactive ray trace Hik[pVK@  
    Editable geometry v &n &i?  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) oWmla*nCKL  
    z{\.3G  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 4KCxhJq  
    3D textures HdM;c*K  
    Source definition Cmj)CJ-  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist C7#$s<>TO  
    Lmb<)YY  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition #=rR[:M  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface PO&`r r  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) yWzTHW`)Mr  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities m| Z)h{&  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) duI8^&|  
    . fIodk  
    TracePro features not in LT |($pXVLH`  
    Ray trace through GRIN material Q*he%@w  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP ,O}zgf*H;  
    gP3[=a"\  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT -8Ii QRS  
    nMhc3t  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT Z]tz<YSkG  
    P.o W#Je  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) L|<Mtw  
    Oe$C5KA>LW  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT STI8[e7{  
    %^S1 fUwT  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) LE;c+(CAU  
    ,0~=9dR  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP W;=ZQ5Lw  
    (~jOtUyT  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons m*1=-" P  
    ek9%Xk8  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP ' {Q L`L  
    s SDBl~g  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software W|:WAxJ*d  
    K&/W cuP &  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    197
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools ~sOAm  
    #(%6urd  
    J( 0c#}d  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 .k}h'nE  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented 7>#74oy  
    gD-<^Q-  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 ZPXxrmq%  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 WkT4&|POJ  
        =7a9~&|  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!