切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 19471阅读
    • 21回复

    [讨论]LightToolsVsTracePro [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线shiloh
     
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2005-09-22
      TracePro Overview E 0k1yA  
    Qx{[#[Da  
    Like LightTools, TracePro is an solid-modeling based illumination modeling program with a Windows-based interface and CAD import/export capability aM2[<m}  
    f*uD9l%/  
    TracePro modeling capabilities are similar to LightTools but with significant weaknesses that make it harder to use and less flexible, and is especially limited in 3D texture modeling compared to LightTools wfE%` 1  
    ueimTXk  
    TracePro analysis features are similar to LightTools, but LightTools is much stronger as an interactive design AND analysis tool
     
    分享到
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses i*q!|^M  
    0lyCk }c  
    User Interface [+j39d.Q  
    Must move/rotate objects by dialog box only ^KK9T5H  
    Default naming convention (for spheres/elements, etc) is confusing and ambiguous W@:a3RJ  
    G0u3*.  
    Modeling RR 8Z 9D;  
    Most elements cannot be edited KPT@I3P  
      Must be deleted and recreated (including optical properties) DJm/:td  
    No unboolean capability XIrNT:h4  
    Boolean limited to two objects at a time TLkJZ4}?Q  
    3D texture very limited vs. LT
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro Weaknesses !`VO#_TJ  
    4't@i1Ll(  
    Ray Trace Nr#Y]9nA  
    No interactive (point & shoot) ray trace )~](qLSl  
    No point sources; no volume sources B1&H5gxgN  
    Clipped Lambertian sources are difficult (LED or fiber output) [SW@"C!  
    x%;Q /7&$  
    Analysis ?Z<2zm%qV  
    No illumination error estimate 's]+.3">L1  
    Only 4 preset bins “available” us.+nnd  
    No 2D intensity distributions of full spheres 10/N-=NG18  
    Limited ray sorting options
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    LT Strengths vs. TracePro ,{C(<1  
    4LU'E%vlC  
    LT has excellent design features vs. TracePro ax0:v!,e  
    Interactive ray trace @"~Mglgw  
    Editable geometry HA{-XPAWZ  
    More powerful macro language in LT (VB/COM/Excel/etc. vs. Scheme) Kis\Rg  
    X;5U@l  
    TracePro features not fully or well implemented 5JbPB!5;  
    3D textures k3m|I*_\L  
    Source definition z]k=sk  
    Many others
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    TracePro/LT Feature Checklist ~6'6v 8  
    ~Exd_c9  
    Recent LT features addressing TracePro competition -Uz xs5Zl  
    New LT 4.0 User Interface Z6&s 6MF  
    Accelerated Ray Tracing (improved in 5.0) AW LKve_  
    AOI and Wavelength Scattering capabilities *@Z/L26s;=  
    Powerful 3D texture modeling for backlights (greatly expanded in v5.1 available 12/04) D PnKr/  
    s,^?|Eo;0  
    TracePro features not in LT +w/Ax[K  
    Ray trace through GRIN material g1\4Jb  
    Birefringent ray tracing
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Misc. Comparisons, LT vs. TP &86km FA  
     Iz2K  
    Some large CAD models consume 20-30% more RAM and more CPU time in TP vs. LT QEM")(  
    q*A2>0O  
    TP CAD import repair feature much slower than LT K0]'v>AWr  
    r2.87  
    Inability to edit properties of Booleaned objects in TP (easy and unlimited in LT) .i/]1X*;r^  
    ~}4o=O(  
    Luminance meter simulation is simple approximation in TP, much more flexible and accurate in LT -!MDYj+U  
    9B'l+nP  
    Most operations in LT can be done by mouse, by numeric input, or any combination (fewer TP features are mouse-enabled) wC BL1[~C  
    *|Re,cY  
    LT online help is extensive and useful, but very limited in TP kTex>1W;  
    /,5`#Gte_  
    ORA Tech Support for LT is by a dedicated team or experience illumination and optical engineers
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    3D Texture Comparisons -baGr;,Cu  
    D +)6#i Y  
    3D texture modeling more flexible and much faster to ray trace in LT vs. TP SBjtg@:G0n  
    ?9!tMRb  
    LT (5.1) has flexible features to parametrically vary all 3D texture features (spacing, size, angles, depth, etc.) by equation or by direct “placement lists” imported from spreadsheet or other software 5G){7]P+r"  
    9;Wz;p  
    When optimization is available in 2005, these parametric textures will make it much easier to design backlight systems
    离线shiloh
    发帖
    14
    光币
    198
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2005-09-22
    Coming Soon in LightTools #jr;.;8sQ  
    AXPUJ?V  
    ~c?yHpZx%  
    Photorealistic rendering will be introduced in LightTools in 2005 #TW$J/Jb  
        Available now in TP, but feature is poorly implemented (fh:q2E#  
    >Fx$Rty  
    Illumination optimization including special backlight design features will be introduced in 2005 cw"x0 RS  
        Has been demonstrated in papers, ORA demos, and limited customer testing in 2004 Z mi<Z  
        (:+IS W  
        Is now being developed for maximum ease of use for typical users and applications       without user programming
    离线结构设计
    发帖
    158
    光币
    275
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2005-09-29
    看来楼主对这两个软件深有了解吗!佩服佩服...
    离线robin
    发帖
    13
    光币
    60
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2005-10-12
    Shiloh,你好!你的帖子非常好!谢谢!