[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: 7!Z\B-_,  
tW;?4}JR  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) v[VUX69  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 p$^}g:  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 wb^Yg9  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 @D_=MtF<  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 &!uw;|%  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 )3g7dtq}  
%O-RhB4q  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: %.,-dV'  
w^tNYN,i  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) m@o/W  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 6LZ(bP'd;  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ZY-UQ4_|u  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 [FLRrTcE  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 "l~wzPY)  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ,Zs:e.  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 _YzItge*  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 # JHicx\8l  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! C+\c(M a  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 q [}
<LU  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德