[讨论]用ZEMAX做球差分析？ [复制链接]

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: G%a8'3d,  
iaqhP7!  
Surf   SPHA  S1    COMA  S2    ASTI  S3    FCUR  S4    DIST  S5    CLA (CL)    CTR (CT) H$:Z`CQt<  
STO    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 T:$zNX<f  
  2    0.010451    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 e$k]z HlQ  
  3    0.149161    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 %f{1u5+5  
IMA    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 I 9yNTD  
TOT    0.159612    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000    0.000000 {[~ !6&2(k  
X(-e-:B4;  
正透镜怎么是正球差？

小弟,這是seidel系數,所以是正的

见笑了,本人刚开始用ZEMAX.以后请大家多多帮忙.

用负透镜就是负的???

Seidel Aberration Coefficients: UQ#"^`=R<  
"d'D:>z]%  
Surf   SPHA S1   COMA S2   ASTI S3   FCUR S4   DIST S5   CLA (CL)   CTR (CT) Rh-e C6P  
STO   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 G>{B
ij44  
2   0.010952   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 MXY[t  
3   0.083893   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 oD]tHuDa  
4   -0.140894   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 c&.>SR')  
5   -0.001454   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 ?yfk d:WD  
IMA   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 _}.BZ[i  
TOT   -0.047503   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 umrfA  
这怎么又有负的????

这是球差吗？我也在困惑中! z+IBy+  

为了下载，只能灌水啦，唉

哈哈哈 oPP`)b$x  
是啊

正透镜不就是正球差吗？对于双凸结构的那种正透镜来说！

赛德