切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 14424阅读
    • 64回复

    [讨论]做光学设计的,要成功靠什么? [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线tassy
    发帖
    5182
    光币
    44774
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 40楼 发表于: 2011-09-26
    靠知识,知识即力量.
    离线jiajunzoo
    发帖
    34
    光币
    81
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 41楼 发表于: 2011-09-27
    不错不错。顶一下
    离线w000000y
    发帖
    571
    光币
    370
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 42楼 发表于: 2011-09-27
    很好很好很好很好
    离线superyu2009
    发帖
    1961
    光币
    4028
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 43楼 发表于: 2011-09-29
    4楼的哥门巴说得很好
    离线f-22
    发帖
    1078
    光币
    544
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 44楼 发表于: 2011-09-30
    要做就做最优秀的光学工程师 r77?s?  
    天天要求加班 w4<RV:Vmt  
    工作量最少也得要求十几个钟头 MS%xOB*6  
    什么变焦呀、红外呀、非球面呀。 EX7gTf#  
    能给他干的都给他干喽 D"oyl`q  
    早上六点就到,晚上还得加班 fT!n*;h  
    公司里全都是工作狂,光干活,不回家的那种 osB[KRT>("  
    老板一个电话,甭管有事没事 hR Y *WL  
    都得跟人家说,要不要方案啊 ~M6Q8Y9  
    一脸地道的奴才相 =5a~xlBjD  
    倍想挨抽 #qi@I;;t  
    每个人都有你的联系电话 Z)Nl\e& M  
    墙上都是你的详细地址 ExqI=k`Zs  
    连厕所门上都有你的手机号 B9`nV.a  
    公司里搁着铺盖  =P\H}?PF  
    二十四小时侯着 A_6b 4T  
    就一个字“累” r in#lu& N  
    每月光打车,就得万八千的 ,YX[6eZr  
    周围的员工,不是加到四点,就是加到五点 I9h?Z&n5  
    你要是加到一点多呀 -)(HG)3  
    你都不好意思跟老板打招呼 m/r4f279  
    你说这样的员工一个月能挣多少钱 2u4aCfIx  
    我觉得怎么着得有两千多块吧 /v 7U~i5  
    两千多块!那是一年! O:"gJ4D  
    就一百多块 ZC'(^liAp  
    别嫌少,还是税前 a$.(Zl  
    你得研究咱光学工程师的工作心理 }@_F( B  
    愿意为一百多块累得吐血的 WUkx v*  
    根本就不在乎挣多少钱 LSv0zAIe/  
    什么是最优秀的光学工程师,你知道吗? w&:"x@ -|  
    优秀的光学工程师就是不管干什么样的事 %,Xs[[?i  
    都干最累的,不干钱多的 QXqBb$AXi,  
    所以我们做光学的口号就是:不求最好,但求最累、
    离线suking
    发帖
    53
    光币
    33
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 45楼 发表于: 2011-10-03
    迷惘啊!都不知道自己有沒有選錯方向!
    离线mang2004
    发帖
    2407
    光币
    11247
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 46楼 发表于: 2011-10-03
    这儿有更绝妙的回答。(http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/laserioi.htm#ioilhu6) x-J.*X/aB  
    ypyqf55gK  
    So You Think You Want to be an Optical (or Laser) Engineer g{0a]'ph  
    OK, this really is more about optics than lasers but it was too good to pass up! mN+ w,  
    (From: Jim Klein (kdpoptics@kdpoptics.com).) Y~vyCU5nWR  
    Mkc   
    If you possess any or all of the following characteristics, you can become an optical designer: n$]78\C  
    ;\1/4;m  
    W%Jw\ z=  
    You are too honest to become a project manager. iF0x>pvJ@  
    vl1`s ^}R  
    You are too smart to become a line (people) manager. :De@_m  
    ,6N|?<26O  
    You are not handy with lab equipment and tend to drop hardware and burn yourself with soldering irons and glue your fingers together with crazy glue. BJA&{DMHm  
    va6e]p*Oy  
    You really understand the optical invariant and pupil imagery. ^!a4!DGVT  
    ?fv5KdD  
    You like computers and software more than people and social interaction. 3(?V!y{@  
    If you become an optical designer be ready for some or all of the following: +r8:t5:/I  
    Y 1v9sMN,  
    `X;'*E]e  
    Anyone who buys ZEMAX will think that makes them smarter than you, even if it is the company janitor and even if you use ZEMAX as well. v/ $~ifY"  
    p~LTu<*S  
    Your boss reminds you in meetings to use all the spheres you can cause they're cheaper than those pesky conics and aspheres in the TMAs you design. (this actually happened last Friday). NA@<v{z  
    .AHf]X0  
    The system engineer has you explain simple optical principles over and over again and then keeps asking you why JOE DOTES at the XYZ company had no problem with the design, forgetting that you're working at F/2 with a 80 degree FOV at 0.3 microns and his design was running at F/10 with a 0.025 degree FOV at 20 microns. (this happened on Thursday) (tG8HwV-  
    }J_"/bB  
    Your Boss is always asking you, at budget time, if you "really" need that ray tracing program user support. (this happens every year in November). 04o>POR  
    $r3kAM;V:  
    Your boss and your system engineer are both convinced that they are way smarter than you are because they can't believe you understand principles in optics which just give them headaches and make them cry. "INIP?  
    S=f:-?N|  
    You'll be the last to be promoted and the first guy on the lay off list. r>o#h+'AV  
    /sU~cn^D5  
    If your boss saw it work on Star Trek, you should be able to design it in an hour. ML:Zm~A1U  
    (From: Mark W. Lund (mlund@moxtek.com).) 5f#N$mh  
    <vb%i0+b.^  
    . {\lbI  
    I had a boss once who told me that optical engineers are too inflexible, so he was going to have the EEs do the optical engineering, and by the way you aren't going to get a raise for two years (two days later I got a 15% raise by moving to another company). zeqwmV=  
    ! !KA9mP  
    Your boss will expect you to be an expert in sources, detectors, fibers, lens design, infrared, UV, visible, diffraction limited, visual, and light bucket systems, while at the same time having teams of EEs who specialize in only power supplies, or antennas, or digital or analog. )~> C1<  
    Chso]N.1  
    You will be allocated the last remaining space in the box, and told to make it fit (use mirrors, I was told). FqWW[Bgd  
    ./7*<W:  
    I was once on a missile project where the mechanical engineer was tasked to design an infrared window that would stand the multi-mach stresses. Three times he came to me with the same solution: stainless steel meets the specification. .<fn+]  
    :ebu8H9f%  
    Memorize a dialog explaining how you can't focus the light from a 60 watt light bulb into a 10 micron spot to burn holes in the table. You will need this once a week for your entire career. !4Oj^yy%  
    ]S2F9  
    Be prepared to have fun using the most wonderful engineering substance in the universe: light. b7uxCH]Z  
    (From: Steve Roberts (osteven@akrobiz.com).) *(+*tj cWa  
    )G+D6s23  
    J]AkWEiCJ  
    They also KNOW that 1 watt of laser light does the effective work of many kilowatts. It, according to their physics, has to propagate as perfectly parallel beam with no losses and is immune from the laws of thermodynamics. Therefore, all supervisors who have read the high school level laser text and are thus experts think you should be fired when they cant understand why you tell them their proposed 40 W CO2 laser is not a good choice to heat a 10 cm diameter spot on a chunk of thick aluminum plate to 1,000 Degrees F in 1 second or less from 400 feet away in open air using just a simple 2 inch lens. Happened last Wednesday. :) Y| dw>qO  
    (From: Anonymous (localnet1@yahoo.com).) GZq~Pl  
    A )q=.C#e  
    ByU&fx2Z  
    Don't forget the fun you can have working on a large frame ion laser, with the cover open, on a nice WELL grounded scaffold, when you spring a leak in your cooling lines? Nothing like 500 or 600 VDC at 40 A to lighten up one's day! (Oh yeah. I forgot to mention... The gig you were paid $10K to perform, in front of the heads of a major corporation is set to go on in less than 4 minutes.) Happened about a year ago to a friend of mine. 6P$jMjs  
    (From: William Buchman (billyfish@aol.com).) c'!+]'Lr  
    O-3R#sZ0  
    E[=# Rw!*  
    Let me add their certainty that it is important to squeeze out all possible energy from a laser rangefinder. They do not realize that this energy goes mostly to increasing beam-width and extending the tail of the pulse. $wm.,Vb  
    (From: Spencer Luster (sluster@lw4u.com).) >LAhc7I  
    =JW.1;  
    l_lK,=cLj+  
    I cannot count the number of times I have been asked: "Can't you put a lens or something in front of the source to make it brighter?". So far in my career I have refrained from answering, "It wouldn't work for you. It won't work for the light." 8V?*Bz-4`  
    (From: ehusman@zianet.com.) '=V1'I*  
    )a=FhSB[G  
    A [hvT\X  
    You must be able to find some way of making *that* camera focus behind *that* telescope in such a way that the movement is on the scale of several inches, not several microns. It's simply too hard for technicians to focus that fine. You can use a different micrometer, with a bigger scale, or something. hY(q@_s  
    SHA6;y+U/~  
    By using *simple* geometry, the customer can prove that the image will be larger than 5 microns at the focal plane, so don't tell them that 30 km of atmosphere is going to degrade the resolution. You can fix the problem with a Barlow, or something. 7`P1=`..  
    oC  }  
    There's enough light out at that time of morning for the customer to drive without headlights, so there must be enough light to take pictures, even at 100 microsecond exposure times. You should find a way to push-process the film more, and you shouldn't confuse the issue with any reference to spectral sensitivity, scattering, or extinction, because the webpedia says that sucker is 6,600 K all day long, every day of the year. A+QOox]<  
    离线飞翔曲
    发帖
    16
    光币
    13
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 47楼 发表于: 2011-10-04
    要有耐心,因为优化像质,需慢慢弄
    离线drymatini
    发帖
    1176
    光币
    1784
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 48楼 发表于: 2011-10-04
    回复很亮!!!
    离线tp-laibao
    发帖
    4
    光币
    4
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 49楼 发表于: 2011-10-05
    多听,多看,多想,多做,多问,多说,多总结,多参加会议和培训。 nTH!_S>b(Y  
    敢面对困难和挑战,敢抓住机遇,敢接硬活糙活,敢尝试各种概念,敢承担责任,敢说话。 #e5*Dr8  
    有扎实的理论,有过硬的工具,有和三教九流沟通的本领,上得了讲台,下得了车间,出得了图,调得了同心,写得了paper,测得了性能。   nH(H k%~  
    能和上一级讨价还价,能为下一级设身处地想想。绝对忠诚于所属组织的利益,诚实认真地对待领导,团队,客户,竞争对手。
    a^MR"i>@G  
    :}[[G2|9  
    这位仁兄说的在理,如果能做到我相信在哪个行业都是精英了! .ta*M{t