切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 15102阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 &>=#w"skb6  
    TG]}X\c+V|  
    oyQ0V94j  
    lPS*-p#IZ  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 $c9=mjwH  
    J#@lV  
    QNJ\!+,HV  
    RZ6~c{  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: wP`sXPSmIu  
    u+DX$#-n!]  
    Analysis of Tolerances 5B|,S1b  
    6+ANAk  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX B(Y.`L? %E  
    Title: h#O"Q+J9n  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 QK7e|M  
    msG3 ~@q  
    Units are Millimeters. |8'B/ p=  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. ~,Mr0  
    8r^j P.V  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. f !!P  
    |D(&w+(  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. J";=d4Sd  
    O\JD,w  
    Mnemonics: m+7`\|`jQ  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. T^NJ4L4#  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. 9<Ag1l  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. TK %< a/  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. id4]|jb  
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). F,.Q|.nN  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). Wxk; g  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). X#7}c5^Y  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. 3FY_A(+  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. Z fqQ {_  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. |Cq8%  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). [yvt1:q  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). OaNc9c"  
    ?q6Z's[  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. Kt6C43]7  
    jQs*(=ls  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. A`Q >h{  
    nHVPMi>  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm V0S6M^\DK  
    Mode                : Sensitivities 1^tSn#j  
    Sampling            : 2 !c."   
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 mCK],TOA:  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 0QMaM  
    YPG,9iZ&f  
    O&52o]k5l  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees 6."PS4}:  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY &p )@8HY  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 Eh {up  
    W0U`Kt&~a  
    Sensitivity Analysis: 9D%qXU  
    l_ZO^E~D_  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| v10mDr  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change gINwvzW{  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 A ^-Z)0 :  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 5'62ulwMP=  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 oFb\T iLu  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 3]!h{_:u  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 2*Va9HP!q  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 =#b4c>  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 prqT(1  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 89db5Dx  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 4p?+LdL  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 -ywX5B  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 cB_pyX9Z  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 (y 3~[  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 ,YQ=Zk)w  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 9}.,2JE  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 \ hrBq^I  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 n}VbdxlN  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 +< GrRYbC  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 FoQ?U=er  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 )CFk`57U  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 3Hy%SN(  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ?ISI[hoc  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) ?rAi=w&c  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 a^%8QJW  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 @;g`+:=  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) D xe-XKNc.  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 'lxLnX  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ~Ry $>n*/  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 H U:1f)a a  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 ! Zno[R  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 f%vHx,  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 BvSdp6z9Iv  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 l}dj{s  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 *iPs4Es-  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 7z Ohyl?  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 dko[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 UIO6|*ka  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 0T7M_G'5Q  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 Gs^(YGtU  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 O)Xd3w'  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 MP6 \r  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 }~myf\$  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 q2[+-B)m  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 37%`P \O;s  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 5wT' ,U"+  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ;Gjv9:hUn  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 s'R~ r  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 qJ#L)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 0Ei\VVK>  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 #&;m<%  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 C}x4#bNK  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ^nG1/}  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 Wpiv1GZ%c8  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 c2tEz&=G  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 .q AQP L  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3  Bq~AU#  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 z4 4  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 $xKg }cO  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 v]LFZI5  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 gubb .EY  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 _Ym&UY.u#  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 jrDz7AfA  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 D<+ bzC  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Hj}g1"RA  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes tXssejiE%  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 jEC'l]l  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000  9OrA9r  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes @t{{Q1  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 7H8GkuO  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 H}u)%qY+~  
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes ;`X`c  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 `D&#U'wB   
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Ri^sQ<~(  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 , V0iMq  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 }'@tA")-)  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 5Ws:Ei{R  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 &4ug3  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 lW{I`r\]  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 f~n' Ki+'  
    KDNTnA1c  
    Worst offenders: .#:@cP~v  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change I1eb31<  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 bTA14&& q  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 Z7K!"I  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 1Ud t9$~T  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 f_z2#,g  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 ]ly)z[is"]  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 s5_1}KKCs  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 *YiD B?Si  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 J.CZR[XF#  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 >o=axZNa  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 m%BMd  
    Q@3ld6y  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: il`C,CD  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 @n ~ND).  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 93zlfLS0  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 +ik N) D  
    9I^H)~S  
    Compensator Statistics: uMq\];7I  
    Change in back focus: B8BY3~}]  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 <+mO$0h"r  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 _3FMQY(  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 Z;dwn~Tw  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 MRxo|A{  
    52q!zx E  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: !Cv<>_N).  
    Number of trials: 20 Nt,]00S\w  
    /M{)k_V  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution xr1I8 5kM  
    37za^n?SG  
      Trial       Criterion        Change v~W6yjp  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 st1M.}  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 ":ws~Zep  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 :jN;l  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 sV Z}nq{  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 ./5MsHfbxt  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 JqH.QnKcv  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 *< SU_dAh  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 %Tm' aY"  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 }~0{1&  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 (vYf?+Kb  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 "p_[A  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 v2dSC(hRZ  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 :;gwdZ  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 ::Ve,-0  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 b "AHw?5F  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 s\K-(`j}  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 u{y5'cJ{  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 ='l6&3X  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 T=)L5Vuq<  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 W0C$*oe!_i  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 h?O%XnD  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 4 9+}OIX  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 ;-P:$zw9c  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 G#=b6DB  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 :d/:Ga5v!  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 ^c:eXoU  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 ,'@ISCK^  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 u>-uRz<)t  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 ?\ i,JJO  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 ;:K?7wfXn  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 )-7(Hv1  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 Ub-k<]yZ  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 m$e@<~To  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 Tu T=  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 Vt 5XC~jK  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 m~\m"zJ4  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 ]&%X(jWyn  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 EC&19  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 yyYbB]D  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 [_z2z6  
    tLGwF3e$A  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 4iB)oR  
    UHm+5%ZC  
    Nominal     0.54403234 Y K62#;  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 UmHb-uk ;  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 DL/*t.)"et  
    Mean        0.35770970 B=qRZA!DQ?  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 Op)R3qt{  
    0DjBqh$  
    {`SGB;ho  
    Compensator Statistics: jYssz4)tp  
    Change in back focus: AI`1N%Owi  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 oz7udY=]0  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 nT6iS}h  
    Mean               :         0.161872 "Kf~`0P  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 CX(yrP6;  
    0Nzv@g{3  
    90% >       0.20977951               aIyY%QT  
    80% >       0.22748071               Ib<+m%Ac  
    50% >       0.38667627               +]2~@=<@  
    20% >       0.46553746               K0bmU(Xxp  
    10% >       0.50064115                vVRCM  
    9n2%7dLQ*  
    End of Run. L ~' N6  
    -cC(d$y  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 I.0Usa"z  
    ^ C#bW <T  
    rY+1s^F  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 Qpu2RfP  
    ;-wPXXR  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 K?I&,t_*R  
    80% >       0.22748071                 -L3RzX  
    50% >       0.38667627                 cC]1D*Bn  
    20% >       0.46553746                 )SLs  [  
    10% >       0.50064115 )o,0aGo>Of  
    +5\\wGo<  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? W.<<azi  
    ^!tI+F{n{  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   fL:Fn"Nv  
    6S&YL  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  : *VB*/^6A  
    90% >       0.20977951                 ^(R gSMuT`  
    80% >       0.22748071                 3$54*J  
    50% >       0.38667627                 Tx_ LH"8  
    20% >       0.46553746                 RU=%yk-gM  
    10% >       0.50064115 Pif1sL6'  
    ....... 5]E5V@C   
    f&'md  
    ^E^:=Q?'_  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   @u^Ib33  
    Mode                : Sensitivities b~}}{fm&f  
    Sampling            : 2 CJ_B.  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 N@}U;x}  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 >qCT#TY  
    SDkN  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? ^P[*yf  
    HwHI$IB  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    957
    光币
    1067
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试