切换到宽版
  • 广告投放
  • 稿件投递
  • 繁體中文
    • 14801阅读
    • 24回复

    [讨论]公差分析结果的疑问 [复制链接]

    上一主题 下一主题
    离线sansummer
     
    发帖
    956
    光币
    1054
    光券
    1
    只看楼主 倒序阅读 楼主  发表于: 2011-06-21
    我现在在初学zemax的公差分析,找了一个双胶合透镜 ge$p/  
    #PA 9bM  
    .=/TT|eMS  
    pLsWy&G  
    然后添加了默认公差分析,基本没变 H.!\j&4j  
    7tU=5@M9D  
    xC-&<s  
    78FLy7  
    然后运行分析的结果如下: IF <<6.tz  
    >1NE6T  
    Analysis of Tolerances W=!di3IA  
    rHD_sC*  
    File : E:\光学设计资料\zemax练习\f500.ZMX '\/|K  
    Title: fz W!-  
    Date : TUE JUN 21 2011 ,];QzENw  
    ,g{Ob{qT  
    Units are Millimeters. tZ_D.syBAc  
    All changes are computed using linear differences. ;hJz'&UWQ  
    oaM 3#QJ  
    Paraxial Focus compensation only. L31#v$;4  
    05Y4=7,!  
    WARNING: Solves should be removed prior to tolerancing. ;.&k zzvJ  
    EOzw&M];r  
    Mnemonics: 6"u"B-cz  
    TFRN: Tolerance on curvature in fringes. .dTXC'  
    TTHI: Tolerance on thickness. |,WP)  
    TSDX: Tolerance on surface decentering in x. 0E/,l``p  
    TSDY: Tolerance on surface decentering in y. +`'>   
    TSTX: Tolerance on surface tilt in x (degrees). R9)"%SO<y  
    TSTY: Tolerance on surface tilt in y (degrees). m53~Ysq<  
    TIRR: Tolerance on irregularity (fringes). m"RSDM!  
    TIND: Tolerance on Nd index of refraction. 9]PMti  
    TEDX: Tolerance on element decentering in x. Z:Y_{YAD  
    TEDY: Tolerance on element decentering in y. 0{ !+N6MiR  
    TETX: Tolerance on element tilt in x (degrees). BFn4H%1  
    TETY: Tolerance on element tilt in y (degrees). G?5Vj_n  
    K)s{D ] B  
    WARNING: RAY AIMING IS OFF. Very loose tolerances may not be computed accurately. Q;y)6+VU4  
    cX4I+Mf  
    WARNING: Boundary constraints on compensators will be ignored. %SN"<O!  
    W?R@ eq.9  
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm J @^Ypq  
    Mode                : Sensitivities X@H/"B%u2  
    Sampling            : 2 R 9b0D>Lxt  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 W9/HM!  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 ] Wx?k7T  
    \,-e>  
    l3HfaCP6:  
    Fields: XY Symmetric Angle in degrees  } @4by<  
    #      X-Field      Y-Field       Weight    VDX    VDY    VCX    VCY \<W/Z.}/  
    1   0.000E+000   0.000E+000   1.000E+000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 Ln"D .gpq  
    W>y &  
    Sensitivity Analysis: -DL"Yw}  
    rIQ%X`Y  
                     |----------------- Minimum ----------------| |----------------- Maximum ----------------| Fb\ E39  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change          Value      Criterion        Change 4{CeV7  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 1 ';KWHk8C  
    TFRN   1            -1.00000000     0.54257256    -0.00145977     1.00000000     0.54548607     0.00145374 8\Kpc;zb  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 KK, t!a  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 2 w5* Z\t5  
    TFRN   2            -1.00000000     0.54177471    -0.00225762     1.00000000     0.54627463     0.00224230 ~+CEek  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 F-%Hw  
    Fringe tolerance on surface 3 |}isSCt  
    TFRN   3            -1.00000000     0.54779866     0.00376632     1.00000000     0.54022572    -0.00380662 NY"+Qw@$  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.000000                            0.000000 *1g3,NMA  
    Thickness tolerance on surface 1 ]\(Ho  
    TTHI   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54321462    -0.00081772     0.20000000     0.54484759     0.00081525 0t2n7Y?N  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 W}'l8z]   
    Thickness tolerance on surface 2 ^"] ]rZ)  
    TTHI   2   3        -0.20000000     0.54478712     0.00075478     0.20000000     0.54327558    -0.00075675 BD?u|Fd,i:  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 ob]j1gYb  
    Decenter X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 vC!B}~RG  
    TEDX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 =2e{T J/  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 y_LFkZ  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 __|Y59J%  
    TEDY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005     0.20000000     0.54401464   -1.7700E-005 N^f_hL|:9  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 q0L\{  
    Tilt X tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) cyBm,!  
    TETX   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 l4*vM  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 xiOAj"}~  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surfaces 1 through 3 (degrees) dF$&fo%  
    TETY   1   3        -0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314     0.20000000     0.54897548     0.00494314 1 RVs!;  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ^X ~S}MX  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 1 U3~rtc*  
    TSDX   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 QzS=oiL  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 NK6 ~qWsu  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 1 qW`DCZu  
    TSDY   1            -0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671     0.20000000     0.53999563    -0.00403671 $g_|U:,  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 [C{oj*"c]  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 *JF7 B  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 <b-OdOg  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 =HjC.h  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 1 %#TAz7  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851     0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 DdqE6qE  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 .S[M: <<*  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 2 4Q:r83#  
    TSDX   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 ~rlPS#]o  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 #=N6[:,  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 2 rlY n"3%  
    TSDY   2            -0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807     0.20000000     0.51705427    -0.02697807 kK=f@l  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 yM('!iG*/  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 ?-JW2 E"uT  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 `*3;sq%`  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 31cZ6[  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 2 9XmbHS[0V  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324     0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 QL:Qzr[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 >dXB)yl  
    Decenter X tolerance on surface 3 d)GR]^=r  
    TSDX   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 F},kfCFF  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 %E[ $np>  
    Decenter Y tolerance on surface 3 S 9|^VU  
    TSDY   3            -0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195     0.20000000     0.53419039    -0.00984195 !m8T< LtMl  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 (t5vBUj  
    Tilt X tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 mYbu1542'n  
    TSTX   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 VFq7nV/O  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 /9o6R:B  
    Tilt Y tolerance on surface (degrees) 3 iy|;xBI,  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563     0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 ;@qQ^!g2  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 ^%O$7*  
    Irregularity of surface 1 in fringes Q-J} :U  
    TIRR   1            -0.20000000     0.50973587    -0.03429647     0.20000000     0.57333868     0.02930634 NIHcX6Nw  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 A3|2;4t  
    Irregularity of surface 2 in fringes WO$8j2!~#  
    TIRR   2            -0.20000000     0.53400904    -0.01002330     0.20000000     0.55360281     0.00957047 sl`?9-_[  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 g){gF(   
    Irregularity of surface 3 in fringes 0-p %.}GE  
    TIRR   3            -0.20000000     0.58078982     0.03675748     0.20000000     0.49904394    -0.04498840 q8MyEoc:n  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 Zt}b}Bz  
    Index tolerance on surface 1 MAQ-'s@  
    TIND   1            -0.00100000     0.52606778    -0.01796456     0.00100000     0.56121811     0.01718578 -@Z9h)G|  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                            0.000000 k ~4o`eA  
    Index tolerance on surface 2 h+w1 D}*  
    TIND   2            -0.00100000     0.55639086     0.01235852     0.00100000     0.53126361    -0.01276872 ra8AUj~RX  
    Change in Focus                :       0.000000                           -0.000000 DABV}@K"  
    lo-VfKvy  
    Worst offenders: mR$0Ij/v  
    Type                      Value      Criterion        Change zXk^u gFy  
    TSTY   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 8%p+:6kP5  
    TSTY   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 jOZ>^5}  
    TSTX   2            -0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 `5n^DP*X  
    TSTX   2             0.20000000     0.35349910    -0.19053324 t ?05  
    TSTY   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 yq!peFu  
    TSTY   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 2OjU3z<J  
    TSTX   1            -0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 iLNO}EUL  
    TSTX   1             0.20000000     0.42678383    -0.11724851 bI8')a  
    TSTY   3            -0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 BZIU@^Q_Y[  
    TSTY   3             0.20000000     0.42861670    -0.11541563 0^)~p{Zh  
    OW#G{#.6R  
    Estimated Performance Changes based upon Root-Sum-Square method: _-2;!L#/  
    Nominal MTF                 :     0.54403234 H9Vn(A8&`  
    Estimated change            :    -0.36299231 Mm!;+bM%  
    Estimated MTF               :     0.18104003 8:2Vib$  
    {kvxz  
    Compensator Statistics: v1/Y0  
    Change in back focus: HY;kV6g{P  
    Minimum            :        -0.000000 &UO/p/a  
    Maximum            :         0.000000 aGAr24]y  
    Mean               :        -0.000000 >h.HW  
    Standard Deviation :         0.000000 x4,[5N"}YK  
    7jGfQ  
    Monte Carlo Analysis: *?A!`JpJn  
    Number of trials: 20 =CO'LyG  
    {XV 'C @B  
    Initial Statistics: Normal Distribution %'VzN3Q5V  
    (EH}lh }%  
      Trial       Criterion        Change 3QF[@8EH{  
          1     0.42804416    -0.11598818 S+*>""=  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.400171 -Ir>pY\!  
          2     0.54384387    -0.00018847 RL H!f1cta  
    Change in Focus                :       1.018470 iiWpm E<,  
          3     0.44510003    -0.09893230 UID`3X  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.601922 xrI9t?QaCb  
          4     0.18154684    -0.36248550 "U$](k.<VA  
    Change in Focus                :       0.920681 $LcMG,8%_  
          5     0.28665820    -0.25737414 xNa66A-8  
    Change in Focus                :       1.253875 f{u S  
          6     0.21263372    -0.33139862 cucT |y  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.903878 8L]Cc!~  
          7     0.40051424    -0.14351809 4J?\JcGs  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.354815 -9Ygn_M  
          8     0.48754161    -0.05649072 #w8.aNU+]  
    Change in Focus                :       0.215922 Mb45UG#2  
          9     0.40357468    -0.14045766 jy_4W!4a  
    Change in Focus                :       0.281783 b5ul|p  
         10     0.26315315    -0.28087919 ux,eY  
    Change in Focus                :      -1.048393 GkI{7GD:z  
         11     0.26120585    -0.28282649 )1$H 7|  
    Change in Focus                :       1.017611 yo%Nz"  
         12     0.24033815    -0.30369419 `b%^_@Fb  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.109292 N8=-=]0G  
         13     0.37164046    -0.17239188 U* uMMb}$  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.692430 l}k'ZX4  
         14     0.48597489    -0.05805744 LI^D\  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.662040 o/[Ks;l  
         15     0.21462327    -0.32940907 =NSunW!  
    Change in Focus                :       1.611296 EQX<<x"  
         16     0.43378226    -0.11025008 }:QoYNq  
    Change in Focus                :      -0.640081 ",#Ug"|2  
         17     0.39321881    -0.15081353 F&B E+b/#  
    Change in Focus                :       0.914906 3+q-yP#X  
         18     0.20692530    -0.33710703 jhBfy|Ftu  
    Change in Focus                :       0.801607 if3z Fh  
         19     0.51374068    -0.03029165 Om_ "X6  
    Change in Focus                :       0.947293 -Owb@Nw  
         20     0.38013374    -0.16389860 5=}CZYWB  
    Change in Focus                :       0.667010 `:jF%3ks+0  
    N/<c;"o  
    Number of traceable Monte Carlo files generated: 20 7#X`D  
    k ~F ,n  
    Nominal     0.54403234 1=ZQRJW0B  
    Best        0.54384387    Trial     2 P0U&+^W"9  
    Worst       0.18154684    Trial     4 wD W/?lT&  
    Mean        0.35770970 F+j"bhe  
    Std Dev     0.11156454 &JD^\+7U:  
    `LKf$cx(A  
    XQmg^x[,A  
    Compensator Statistics: 8*|*@  
    Change in back focus: \< a^5'  
    Minimum            :        -1.354815 f hNJB0  
    Maximum            :         1.611296 >6IUle>z  
    Mean               :         0.161872 !D V0u)k(  
    Standard Deviation :         0.869664 Og8%SnEpMI  
    x?od_M;*8;  
    90% >       0.20977951               } :gi<#-:G  
    80% >       0.22748071               |KO[[4b ?+  
    50% >       0.38667627               *y$CDv  
    20% >       0.46553746               kf#S"[/E  
    10% >       0.50064115                !f}D*8\f  
    ~-uDN)  
    End of Run. P{Q$(rOe  
    %:Y(x$Qy  
    这就有了些疑问,为什么我选择的补偿器是近轴焦点,而分析结果近轴焦点都不变化??应该是变得。另外最后的蒙特卡洛分析,只有10%的大于0.5(我用的是MTF作为评价方式),可是我设计的MTF如图 0%,?z`UY  
    IGab~`c-[  
    #\O'*mz  
    是大于0.6左右的,难道我按照这个默认的公差来加工的话,只有10%的才可能大于0.5?那太低了啊,请问这该怎么进行进一步处理。或者之前哪有问题 !1A< jL  
    {~G~=sC$  
    不吝赐教
     
    分享到
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    956
    光币
    1054
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-06-21
    我又试了试,原来是得根据上面的结果不断修改公差,放松或者变紧,然后在做公差分析,不断提高蒙特卡罗的结果。但是比如就拿我这个来说,理想是达到30lp处>0.6,那么实际做蒙特卡罗公差分析时,百分之多少以上的MTF是合格的呢?
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    956
    光币
    1054
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-06-22
    90% >       0.20977951                 }OTJ{eG  
    80% >       0.22748071                 17 0r5  
    50% >       0.38667627                 x3.,zfWs  
    20% >       0.46553746                 wM3m'# xJ  
    10% >       0.50064115 5g$>J)Ry  
    IS;[oJef  
    最后这个数值是MTF值呢,还是MTF的公差? Z%=A[` 5]  
    EWv[Sp  
    也就是说,这到底是有90%的产品MTF大于0.20977951还是90%的产品的MTF变化量大于0.20977951???   :_=YH+bZ  
    lvNi/jk  
    怎么没人啊,大家讨论讨论吗
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    956
    光币
    1054
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    没有人啊???
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    引用第2楼sansummer于2011-06-22 08:56发表的  :  a3a:H  
    90% >       0.20977951                 crSqbL  
    80% >       0.22748071                 GxC\Nj#  
    50% >       0.38667627                 YIb7y1\UM  
    20% >       0.46553746                 o#BI_#b  
    10% >       0.50064115 \g)?7>M|  
    ....... \b$Y_  
    {G<1.  
    Sl% 6F!  
    这些数值都是MTF值
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2011-06-23
    Criterion           : Geometric MTF average S&T at 30.0000 cycles per mm   ~lqNWL^l  
    Mode                : Sensitivities PpF`0w=1%l  
    Sampling            : 2 >!tfvM2X{  
    Nominal Criterion   : 0.54403234 :2:%  
    Test Wavelength     : 0.6328 hPCSAo!|  
    S?VKzVDB.S  
    波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    956
    光币
    1054
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 5楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    谢谢。您说的“波长632.8nm 时 mtf 是 0.54403234  没达到0.6”这是一个评价标准吧? 1(% 6X*z  
    wjT#D|soI  
    这个评价标准和我理想的设计结果的0.6有什么联系吗,另外这个 0.54403234  是这么来的?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 6楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    你试试把原来的系统波长改成632.8nm,看看Geometric MTF    30 per mm 的mtf值是不是0.54403234
    离线sansummer
    发帖
    956
    光币
    1054
    光券
    1
    只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2011-06-24
    回 7楼(天地大同) 的帖子
    啊...这倒也是。换了波长的确可能有所变化。另外还有就是如果现在百分比太低,我是否应该考虑把最敏感的公差再紧一些,就会好了?
    离线天地大同
    发帖
    295
    光币
    1895
    光券
    0
    只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2011-06-28
    回 8楼(sansummer) 的帖子
    恩,多多尝试