[讨论]初学红外镜头设计 希望大家一起来讨论一下 呵呵 [复制链接]

其实按你现在的设计已经可以投产了，我只是考虑成型后成像质量会没有设计的好！所以建议一下。我想有两种方法：1 把2片口径加大，让边缘光线偏折，小一点。2  把光栏放置在系统后 应该会好些！

1、具体的后截距需要多少要看探测器的规格，我手上没有这方面的资料，我也需要这方面的信息。2、镜片的边厚比小于10:1就够加工了，不会有问题了。 p"JSYF 9]  
3、你后来发的结构还有优化空间，我试了下，像差可以更小些，我这上传不了附件。

是么？那站内信可以么? 呵呵 我想看一下你是怎么控制像差的 那些操作数我还是不太会用 7HJv4\K  
最后，谢谢您的回复 =j{jylC  

谢谢您的回复 KCFwO'  
您的评价对我来说实在是太高了哈 都可以投产了啊～～小高兴一下 RmQt%a7\{  
我会试一下您的建议的

学习学习

热烈欢迎 呵呵

leileiguai, N8YBu/  
fEG3b#t N  
You have done tolerancing and cost evaluation of this design? Z)i1?#  
(g/
X(3  
MANG2004 pb6^sA%l  

no, that's just what i am thinking about. my teacher have said that my design had already maintaned the requirement which the speific detector needed, but he let myself think over the reason, and what your suggestion is the following work i have to do to make my design perfect! i will try. +>:}req  
)*K<;WIWH  
n*i'vtQ8  

Sounds good. =,d* {m~A  
s"=F^#  
Please HIGH priority your teacher’s suggestion, it’s time to do theoretical analysis, i.e. how you define the system level requirements, how you apply these reqs on the detail lens design process, and why your design output meets these reqs... , take time on paper work. NB3Syl8g  
du'}+rC  
Well done! g{v5mly  
hD$p;LF  
MANG2004

thank you for your continual supporting, i really  appriciate your kindness. ,DQGv_  
i will work harder on my paper.