有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考:
[:(^n0% Uc?#E $X http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 yq2pg8% >2w^dI2 Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
a2'f#[as ,aBo
p# I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
&?xZHr` oe{K0.` The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
.V Cfh+*J# available, but more difficult to use.