有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考:
wp1O*)/q `&c[s%0 http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 el5Pe{j' @Ik5BT Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
wT!?.Y)aj 3HtM<su*h I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
&_Cc ."dT6u E The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
9U<WR*H available, but more difficult to use.