有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考:
I+
l% Sn#\ 1MsWnSvzf http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 V ~MiO.B u^W2UE\ Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax.
. \3`2 -cF'2Sfr I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now.
l3o#@sz: \t4tiCw The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software
zJlQ_U- ! available, but more difficult to use.
