you might need to tweak the surface semi-diameter/radius a bit to make rays traceable towards the image plane. your calculation based on PW method is an approximation I would assume, so make a little change to start with for few cycles of optimization then you should be able to get around the problem.
咏物词
2014-10-28 20:21
hopebox:you might need to tweak the surface semi-diameter/radius a bit to make rays traceable towards the image plane. your calculation based on PW method is an approximation I would assume, so make a little change to start with for few cycles of optimization then you .. (2014-10-28 19:56) G \
/L.T
h5@JS1cY Thanks for your anwser! But new problem come up.I have choosen "Afocal image space",但出射光并不平行，反而汇聚到一点，这是为什么呢？ 9w$+Qc =T |m#*{.L 英语不好 LOL
hopebox
2014-10-28 20:32
Check the following: 3 NgyF[c Q5tx\GE General > Aperture (did you tick Afocal Image Space?) . q9i10C _E
x d : Once you do so, make use of Default Merit Function and select Angular Radius option. Read a bit more from the user manual about this option would be helpful!
hopebox
2014-10-28 20:33
咏物词:Thanks for your anwser! But new problem come up.I have choosen "Afocal image space",但出射光并不平行，反而汇聚到一点，这是为什么呢？ (T Fo]c 英语不好 LOL (2014-10-28 20:21) TeWpdUCO
9EKc{1
z Sorry, forget about checking the Afocal Image Space. You did so already! My apologies!
咏物词
2014-10-28 20:39
hopebox:Check the following: ,t=1 2R]> General > Aperture (did you tick Afocal Image Space?) XU19+mW=P Once you do so, make use of Default Merit Function and select Angular Radius option. Read a bit more from the user manual about this option would be helpful! (2014-10-28 20:32) wu2C!gyBo
t@O4 !mFH awesome！thanks a lot！ t[- 0/-4
咏物词
2014-10-28 20:42
hopebox:Sorry, forget about checking the Afocal Image Space. You did so already! My apologies! (2014-10-28 20:33) $DfaW3bJ
`F Imi9%F You are really awesome！The problem is solved，thanks a lot！
