| yihtalim |
2007-10-10 01:06 |
有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考: TD9`S SpP
|0mI3r
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 4Fq}*QJ-
&9{BuBO[
Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax. r/ f;\w7
>$F]Ss)$
I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now. 9m!fW|4
'h=2_%l@Y
The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software 6Fb~`J~s
available, but more difficult to use.
|
|
kankan