| yihtalim |
2007-10-10 01:06 |
有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考: I zbU)ud
BvrB:%_:
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 ] b9-k
OS|> t./U
Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax. '})0!g<Y
Nc Pgq?3p
I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now. 8X|r4otn4
^u}L;`L
The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software ph> 7?3;t
available, but more difficult to use.
|
|
kankan