| yihtalim |
2007-10-10 01:06 |
有个网民如是说,其经验比较完整,供大家参考: # d"M(nt
kN 2mPD/
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?p=525969 ui8$ F
"I*
gm]q<~eMW
Macleod has the more normal Windows-like user interface, so I'm more comfortable with it. Both programs have their idiosyncracies, but they're easy enough once you get to know them. I think Macleod's program has more optimization algorithms, and I often found that switching between them gave the best results for tough problems. As a ray bender, I also appreciated Macleod's ability to export coatings to Zemax. ~ C
3 Y/}
A["6dbvv
I tried the freeware version of FilmStar many years ago when Fred was porting to 32 bit and found it too buggy to use. I expect it's better now. hK4 ww"-
<2 j$P Y9
The late Phil Baumeister told me that OptiLayer was the most powerful software 9J%O$sF
available, but more difficult to use.
|
|
kankan